PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home » Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis



ONCOLOGY. Vol. 16 No. 11
Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Distant Effects of Cancer on the Nervous System

By

Frank S. Lieberman, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
S. Clifford Schold, MD
Professor of Neurology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Clinical Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

| November 1, 2002
Paraneoplastic disorders of the nervous system are important to the practicing oncologist, because these syndromes, although uncommon, produce significant neurologic dysfunction and disability. The neurologic disorder may be the first manifestation of an unrecognized systemic malignancy, and appropriate diagnosis of the paraneoplastic disorder can lead to a focused search for an underlying cancer. Paraneoplastic disorders may involve any component of the central or peripheral nervous system, and diagnosis requires careful neurologic assessment. The diagnosis is made by recognition of clinical neurologic syndromes and the use of selected laboratory studies as indicated by the clinical picture. Over the past 10 years, the application of molecular biologic techniques to the study of these disorders has elucidated much about the mechanisms that cause neurologic injury. In most cases, disordered humoral and cellular immunity has been demonstrated, and the role of novel targets for autoimmune attack is being clarified. For some paraneoplastic disorders, treatment of the underlying tumor may lead to improvement of the neurologic disorder. For others, various forms of immunosuppressive therapy may be indicated. Unfortunately, for several of the more common paraneoplastic syndromes such as paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration or limbic encephalitis, treatment is still unsatisfactory, and further research into the exact pathophysiology is clearly needed. [ONCOLOGY 16:1539-1556, 2002]

Neurologic diseases are defined as paraneoplastic when they occur with increased frequency in patients with cancer and are not related to a direct effect of the tumor, infection, metabolic abnormalities, or toxicity of therapy.[1,2] Autoantibodies and evidence of cellular autoimmunity directed against neuronal, glial, or muscle cell antigens have been identified in several paraneoplastic neurologic disorders.[3,4] Over the past 4 decades, investigators have identified and reported these disorders using a variety of names. This review follows the nosology employed by Posner.[2]

Paraneoplastic disorders are rare, but accurate diagnosis is important. In patients without a known malignancy, correct diagnosis may lead to the discovery and early treatment of the underlying malignancy. Effective treatment may improve the patient’s neurologic dysfunction and quality of life. In addition, proper diagnosis of a paraneoplastic disorder can spare the patient an extensive and expensive search for alternative etiologies of the neurologic dysfunction.

Paraneoplastic disorders are diagnosed by recognition of stereotypic clinical syndromes and, when appropriate, confirmatory laboratory studies demonstrating evidence of autoimmunity. Autoantibodies against specific neural antigens characterize several neurologic disorders (Figure 1).[3] In some disorders, eg, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome associated with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC),[5] or myasthenia gravis associated with thymoma,[6] the antibodies are clearly important to the pathogenesis of the disease, and immunosuppression is clearly effective.[7,8] In other disorders, such as encephalomyeloneuritis associated with SCLC, the role of the antibody response in producing neurologic dysfunction is less clear.[8-10]

Subacute Sensory Neuronopathy-Encephalomyeloneuritis

Most frequently associated with SCLC, subacute sensory neuronopathy-encephalomyeloneuritis (SSN-EMN) may affect multiple sites within the central and peripheral nervous system.[11] When SSN-EMN occurs in patients with SCLC, antibodies called anti-Hu are usually present in the serum (Figure 1); high-titer antibodies to the Hu antigen are almost never seen in patients without SCLC.[11] Diagnosis of SSN-EMN and documentation of anti-Hu antibody should lead to a search for SCLC, which is often localized at the time of diagnosis of the neurologic disorder. Low-titer anti-Hu antibodies have been documented in patients with SCLC and no neurologic disease,[12] and the association with localized SCLC suggests that anti-Hu antibodies are a marker for systemic immune suppression of tumor progression.

Various Presentations

The range of presentations and extent of neurologic involvement in patients with paraneoplastic disorders associated with anti-Hu antibodies is quite broad. One presentation is a pure sensory neuropathy.[13] The disorder progresses relentlessly over days to weeks, and sensory nerve action potentials are lost.[14] The cerebrospinal fluid usually demonstrates increased protein concentration and a lymphocytic pleocytosis. In SSN associated with anti-Hu antibody (Figure 2), the dorsal root ganglia show lymphocytic infiltration and loss of neurons.[15] At postmortem examination, inflammatory changes in other regions of the nervous system have been seen in approximately half of the SSN patients studied.

Most cases of SSN are associated with other autoimmune disorders rather than cancer, and anti-Hu antibodies are absent. The association of anti-Hu antibodies with Sjögren’s syndrome is probably spurious.[16] Immunosuppressive therapy is usually ineffective,[17] although spontaneous remission may occur. Treatment of the underlying SCLC may ameliorate the neurologic dysfunction,[18] and treatment of Hodgkin’s disease with chemotherapy resulted in improvement in one patient.[18]

Limbic Encephalitis

The clinical, radiologic, and immunobiologic features of limbic encephalitis have been described in two recent analyses encompassing 250 patients.[19,20] Limbic encephalitis may be mistaken for herpes simplex encephalitis, because its symptoms also include memory disturbance, agitation, and seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans may show mesial temporal contrast enhancement or T2 signal hyperintensities.[21] The cerebrospinal fluid shows increased protein concentration and a lymphocytic pleocytosis. Patients may exhibit symptoms of SSN, or there may be involvement of the brain stem or spinal cord. Biopsy of the temporal lobe may reveal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates. In autopsy specimens, neuronal loss and gliosis are most prominent in the limbic and insular cortex.[19]

Molecular characterization of target antigens divides this syndrome into distinguishable diseases. Most cases of limbic encephalitis are associated with SCLC and the presence of anti-Hu antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid.[19,20] Testicular cancer patients with limbic encephalitis harbor a different antibody.[22] In a series of 13 testicular cancer patients with limbic encephalitis, 10 harbored antibodies against a novel onconeural antigen named Ma2—a 40-kd protein shared by the testis and normal brain that is widely expressed in the normal human central nervous system (CNS) as well as dorsal root ganglia. A related onconeural antigen, Ma1, is associated with cerebellar or brain-stem dysfunction in patients with lung, breast, parotid gland, or colon cancer.[23]

Treatment Options

Limbic encephalitis may be one of the more treatable CNS paraneoplastic disorders.[19,20] Over 40% of patients followed for more than 8 months in a recent series demonstrated some neurologic improvement. Treatment of the underlying tumor appears to be more effective than immunosuppressive therapy. This experience adds to earlier reports of improvement after successful treatment of an underlying lung cancer.[24]

The distinction between anti-Ma2- and anti-Hu-associated limbic encephalitis is important, because patients with anti-Ma2-associated limbic encephalitis have a better prognosis. Orchiectomy and aggressive treatment of residual disease have proven to be most effective as therapy for the anti-Ma2-associated syndrome,[22] whereas immunosuppression has been less successful. One patient, however, did improve after treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin (Ig) G.

Patients with limbic encephalitis should be tested for anti-Hu antibodies; male patients should undergo examination of the testes and be tested for anti-Ma2 antibodies. Detection of anti-Hu or anti-Ma antibodies indicates the likely presence of SCLC or testicular cancer, respectively. In rare instances, small-cell cancers of other organs, including poorly differentiated small cell carcinoma of the prostate, have been diagnosed as the only systemic cancer in patients with limbic encephalitis and anti-Hu antibodies.[11]

Brain-stem encephalitis and myelitis usually occur together and in association with limbic encephalitis.[25] MRI scanning must exclude metastatic tumor. Most cases are associated with anti-Hu antibodies, although other autoantibodies may be present. Brain-stem encephalitis and myelitis usually progress relentlessly and rapidly.

Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • An Update on ADHD
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Ethical and Legal Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Eco-Psychiatry: Why We Need to Keep the Environment in Mind
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Evidence on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Guidelines on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Patient Education on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Practical Articles on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Research and Reviews on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
All "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy