Adolescents are among the most difficult populations with whom to work therapeutically. Giovacchini (1985) wrote that they possess a "propensity for creating problems within the treatment setting [including]...their reticence about becoming engaged or their inclination to express themselves through action rather than words and feelings."
Only a minuscule number of psychotherapists opt to work with these patients, whose problems may be giftedness, drug-dependence and/or self-destructive tendencies, up to and including suicide. Meeks and Bernet write that "the drama and finality of suicide conspire with the personality traits of suicidal youngsters to make treating the suicidal adolescent one of the psychotherapist's most exacting experiences."
There are two unalterable clinical realities working with suicidal adolescents. Rule One: Some will die of drug overdoses, commit suicide or be murdered. Rule Two: There will be cases when concerned clinicians cannot change Rule One.
Not infrequently, suicides occur in inpatient psychiatric programs having 24-hour surveillance. Maltsberger (1992, 1986) offers a partial explanation of why work with these adolescents cannot always be successful when he concludes that no test exists and no single variable exists to predict suicide. Kernberg urges the psychotherapist to "assess the degree of hopelessness...[that] plays a most important role as a predictor of risk [when the therapist experiences] a sense of pessimism about the treatment and about the patient, and his/her own therapeutic skills."
Samorajczyk writes that alienated youngsters "want to know where the limits are—and that someone gives a damn" to guide them in their search for what is expected of them. When there is fear that the adolescent is out of control and might harm him/herself, most psychotherapists and psychoanalysts, choosing not to become more humanistic, active-directive and pragmatic, will be impotent in providing the limit-setting that suicidal adolescents desperately need.
Since suicidal, drug-dependent adolescents engage in illicit behavior, they trust no one. Initially, the therapist is viewed to be a formidable foe who possesses the power either to force them to terminate pleasurable drug-induced euphoria or to incarcerate them.
While describing working with suicidal adolescents, Jobes contends a negative transference dynamic exists because "the clinician is...seen as a member of the...generation from which the adolescent seeks autonomy, and a teen's associations [with] seeing a 'doctor' or a 'shrink' may have a long history that can be antagonistic to the kind of relationship needed for good treatment."
Until the therapist accepts the mandate to prove personal credibility, alienated adolescents neither will like nor trust the therapist who becomes a target for their unmitigated hostility and sarcasm. To protect themselves from being wounded, such adolescents often project an antagonistic, obnoxious attitude before acquiescing to treatment.
Early Sessions: Limit-Setting
Limit-setting forms the basis of the therapeutic alliance during the first month. Masterson maintains it is "impossible to wait for a relationship to be established before starting to set limits...as early as possible, [which] is the unique means of establishing the therapeutic alliance and...is the very gesture of caring the patient hungers for."
The therapist can have no ambivalence in a life-or-death crisis. Any hesitation can be fatal. Until the adolescent fears intervention by the treatment agent or feels hope for the diminution of pain often caused by impulsive acts, he or she will have no incentive to change. Initially, the clinical challenge is to decrease life-threatening behavior by enforcing compliance, which makes therapy tumultuous.
During the potentially lethal phase of treatment when the adolescent is out of control, the psychotherapist needs to be decisive to decrease the possibility of impulsive, annihilative suicidal acts. Desperate, often heroic limit-setting therapeutic strategies are necessary. The most controversial point in the treatment relationship occurs when the psychotherapist imposes him- or herself as the central figure by determining therapeutic limits.
Understandably, most psychotherapists are uncomfortable with this treatment orientation, but given the special clinical challenges of suicidal adolescents, this is not negotiable during the beginning phase of treatment. It becomes the sine qua non of therapeutic behavior necessary to maximize survival. Schneidman states:
The way to save a suicidal person is to cater to that individual's infantile and realistic idiosyncratic needs. The suicide therapist should, in addition to other roles, act as an existential social worker, a practical person knowledgeable about realistic resources. The therapist needs to work diligently, always giving the suicidal person realistic transfusions of hope, until the perturbation intensity subsides enough to reduce the lethality to a tolerable, life-permitting level.
Maintaining a Presence
Working with self-destructive or suicidal adolescents whose crises occur at times other than appointments can create scheduling problems by necessitating missing sessions with others and disrupting one's personal life. When the therapist vacations, continued communication and continuity are crucial, as Motto points out, "to maintain the psychological sense of 'presence'...to demonstrate...[that] the therapist's concern for the young person is not limited...One of the most common circumstances for suicidal acting out is when the therapist is away...[because] it can so easily stir the fears and feelings of abandonment that generate suicidal impulses."
Unless the therapist is prepared to make personal sacrifices by being accessible, by talking on the phone, scheduling extra sessions and, in extreme cases, visiting the adolescent in the community, this treatment population needs to be avoided. Until the crises abate, accessibility is required on a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week basis.
When anticipating being inaccessible, if possible, the psychotherapist needs to introduce the adolescent to the covering professional and make provisions to be reached by phone either by providing a number or arranging for notification through the answering service should a potential emergency or crisis arise. It needs to be stressed that survival of the adolescent precedes transference-countertransference issues.
- Bratter TE. Failing but learning: working with gifted, self-destructive adolescents. Presented at Child and Adolescent Self-Destruction Meeting, Division of Continuing Education, department of psychiatry, Harvard Medical College. 1996; Boston.
- Bratter TE. Group psychotherapy with alcohol and drug addicted adolescents: special clinical concerns and challenges. In: Azima FJC, Richmond LH, eds. Group Psychotherapy. Madison, Conn.: International Universities Press;1986b.
- Bratter TE. Responsible therapeutic eros: the psychotherapist who cares enough to define and enforce behavior limits with potentially suicidal adolescents. Counseling Psychologist. 1975b;5(4);97-104.
- Bratter TE. Special clinical psychotherapeutic issues for alcoholic and drug dependent individuals.. In: Bratter TE , Forrest GG, eds. Alcoholism and Substance Abuse: Strategies for Intervention. New York: Free Press; 1985.
- Bratter TE. When psychotherapy becomes a war: working with gifted, drug-dependent adolescents. Presented at The Addictions: Guidelines for Treatment. Meeting, Division of Continuing Education, department of psychiatry, Harvard Medical College, 1995, Boston.
- Bratter TE. The psychotherapist as advocate: extending the therapeutic alliance with adolescents. J Contemp Psychother. 1996-1977;8(2):119-127.
- Bratter TE. Treating alienated, unmotivated, drug-abusing adolescents. Am J Psychother. 1973;27(4): 585-598.
- Bratter BI, Bratter CJ, Bratter TE. Beyond reality: the need to (re)gain self-respect. Special issue: adolescent treatment: new frontiers and new dimensions. Psychotherapy: 1995;32(1):59-69.
- Brennan T. Adolescent loneliness: linking epidemiology and theory prevention. In: Klerman GL, ed. Suicide and Depression Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 1986.
- Catenaccio R. Crisis intervention with suicidal adolescents: a view from the emergency room. In: Zimmerman JK, Asnis G, eds. Treatment Approaches with Suicidal Adolescents. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
- Easson WM. Patient and therapist after termination of psychotherapy. Am J Psychother. 1971;25(4):635-642.
- Giovacchini PL. The severely disturbed adolescent. In: Brandell JR, ed. Countertransference in Psychotherapy with Children and Adolescents. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson; 1992.
- Giovacchini PL. Countertransference and the severely disturbed adolescent. In: Feinstein S, Sugar M, Esman A, et al., eds. Adolescent Psychiatry, Developmental and Clinical Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985.
- Giovacchini PL. The difficult adolescent patient: countertransference problems. In: Feinstein SC, Giovacchini PL, eds. Adolescent Psychiatry: Developmental and Clinical Studies, Vol. III. New York: Basic Books; 1974.
- Goldstein LS, Buongiorno PA. Psychotherapists as suicide survivors. Am J Psychother. 1984;38(3);392-398.
- Jennings JL, Williams C, Thompson-Owens M. Treating addictive patients at suicidal risk. Psychotherapy. 1994;31(4):700-707.
- Jobes DA. Psychodynamic treatment of adolescent suicidal attempters. In: Zimmerman JK, Asnis GM, eds. Treatment Approaches with Suicidal Adolescents. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
- Joffe R. "Don't help me!"-the suicidal adolescent. In Laufer M, ed. The Suicidal Adolescent. Madison, Conn.: International Universities Press; 1996.
- Kernberg PF. Psychological interventions for the suicidal adolescent. Special Section: adolescent psychotherapy. Am J Psychother. 1994;48(1):52-63.
- Laufer M. Understanding suicide: does it have a special meaning in adolescence?? The Suicidal Adolescent. Madison, Conn.: International Universities Press: 1996a.
- Laufer M. Can we prevent suicide in adolescence? In: Laufer M, ed. The Suicidal Adolescent. Madison, Conn: International Universities Press:1996b.
- Leenas AA, Lester D. Assessment and prediction of suicide risk in adolescents. In: Zimmerman JK, Asnis GM, eds. Treatment Approaches with Suicidal Adolescents. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1995.
- Maltsberger JT. The psychodynamic formation: an aid in assessing suicide risk. In: Maris RW, Berman AL, Maltsberger JT, Yufit RI., eds. Assessment and Prediction of Suicide. New York: Guilford Press; 1992.
- Maltsberger JT. Suicide Risk: The Formation of Clinical Judgment. New York: New York University Press; 1986.
- Masterson JF. Treatment of the Borderline Adolescent: A Developmental Approach. New York: Brunner-Mazel; reprinted 1985.
- Meeks JE, Bernet W. The Fragile Alliance: An Orientation to the Psychiatric Treatment of the Adolescent. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Co.; 1990.
- Motto JA. Treatment concerns in preventing youth suicide. In: Peck ML, Farberow NL, Litman RED, eds. Youth Suicide. New York: Springer Publishing Co.; 1985.
- Palmer, Harper and Rivinus 1983 (residential treatment of adolescents) missing reference needed from author.
- Robinson LH. Outpatient management of the suicidal child. Am J Psychotherapy. 1984;37(3):399- 412.
- Salinger JD. The Catcher in the Rye. Boston: Little Brown; 1951.
- Samorajczyk J. The psychotherapist as a meaningful parental figure with alienated adolescents. Am J Psychother. 1971; 25:110-116.
- Shay, JJ. The wish to do psychotherapy with borderline adolescents-and other common errors. Psychotherapy. 1987;24(4):712-719.
- Schlossberger ES, Hecker L. HIV and family therapists' duty to warn: a legal and ethical analysis. J Marital Family Therapy. 1996;22:1, 27-40.
- Shneidman E. Suicide as Psychache: A Clinical Approach to Self-Destructive Behavior. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson; 1993.
- Sutherland RL. Choosing as a therapeutic aim: method and philosophy. J Existential Psychiatry. 1962;2:368-374.
- Szasz TS. The case against suicide prevention. Am Psychologist. 1986;41(7):806-812.
- Szasz TS. Medicine and the state: the First Amendment violated. Humanist. 1973;33(2):1-11. Unable to verify-ak
- Szasz TS. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis: The Theory and Method of Autonomous Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books; 1965.
- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1976. 17 Cal, 3d 425, 551 P. 2nd 334, 131 Cal Rptr. 14.
- Wachtel PL. On the limits of therapeutic neutrality. Fortieth Anniversary Conference of the William Alanson White Institute Symposium: from neutrality to personal revelation: patterns of influence in the analytic relationship. Contemp Psychoanalysis. 1986;22(1):60-70.
- Winnicott DW. Hate in the countertransference. In Brandell JR, ed. Countertransference in Psychotherapy with Children and Adolescents. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson; 1992.