We've noticed that you're using an ad blocker

Our content is brought to you free of charge because of the support of our advertisers. To continue enjoying our content, please turn off your ad blocker.

It's off now Dismiss How do I disable my ad blocker?
❌

How to disable your ad blocker for our site:

Adblock / Adblock Plus
  • Click on the AdBlock / AdBlock Plus icon on the top right of your browser.
  • Click “Don’t run on pages on this domain.” OR “Enabled on this site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Firefox Tracking Prevention
  • If you are Private Browsing in Firefox, "Tracking Protection" may casue the adblock notice to show. It can be temporarily disabled by clicking the "shield" icon in the address bar.
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Ghostery
  • Click the Ghostery icon on your browser.
  • In Ghostery versions < 6.0 click “Whitelist site.” in version 6.0 click “Trust site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
uBlock / uBlock Origin
  • Click the uBlock / uBlock Origin icon on your browser.
  • Click the “power” button in the menu that appears to whitelist the current website
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
  • Topics
  • CME
  • Special Reports
  • Slideshows
  • Quizzes
  • Blogs
  • Conferences
  • Classifieds
  • Archives

Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Skip to main content
Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Menu
User
Home
  • Topics
  • CME
  • Special Reports
  • Slideshows
  • Quizzes
  • Blogs
  • Conferences
  • Classifieds
  • Archives

SUBSCRIBE: eNewsletter

How American Psychiatry Can Save Itself: Part 2

  • Ronald W. Pies, MD
Mar 2, 2012
Volume: 
29
Issue: 
3
  • Schizophrenia, Addiction

In the February 2012 issue of Psychiatric Times, I discussed and rebutted some common criticisms of psychiatry, such as its alleged lack of “objective” diagnostic criteria and its supposed tendency to “medicalize normality.”1I also suggested that most current criticism of DSM-5 misses the fundamental problem with the recent DSMs—namely, that in the absence of either a sound biological basis for the main disorders or a rich description of the patient’s experience of the disorders (phenomenology), the DSM framework has inadvertently left clinicians with “the worst of both worlds.”

Here I address what, in my estimation, are the primary reasons for the American public’s disenchantment with psychiatry; how the profession ought to address these issues; and how we need to replace the DSM’s categorical system with one that is clinically useful for both clinicians and patients.

What must be done?

So far, I have discussed problems with American psychiatry that, in my view, are largely peripheral to the central concerns of the average clinician—as well as to the average person who suffers from a serious psychiatric illness. In particular, the “loss of faith” in psychiatry that many in the general public evince stems from another set of concerns, both more pressing and more pragmatic than the academic debates swirling around DSM-5.

I very much doubt that many Americans lose sleep over whether psychiatry has a “unified model” of so-called mental illness; nor do I believe that the public’s animus toward psychiatry2 stems primarily from concerns over the DSM-5’s development or content (although well-publicized critiques of the process have certainly not enhanced the profession’s stature).

I believe the American public’s jaundiced perceptions of psychiatry stem from the confluence of 5 main factors, specifically:

1. Psychiatry’s inability, thus far, to develop robustly effective, well-tolerated treatments for several major disorders, such as schizophrenia, autism, and most of the severe personality disorders (despite our having moderately effective treatments for bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and several other conditions).

2. Psychiatry’s increasingly and inappropriately close ties with the pharmaceutical industry in recent decades.

3. The decline, over the past decade, in the use of psychotherapy among US psychiatrists3 and the attendant public perception that psychiatrists “no longer listen” to their patients.

4. A lack of understanding among the general public of the benefits of psychiatric treatments, and not simply the risks; for example, the erroneous belief that psychiatric medications are highly “addictive” or merely “cosmetic” in their effect.4

5. Vituperative attacks on psychiatry by critics both within and out-side the profession, often exacerbated by Internet-based anti-psychiatry groups and lurid depictions of psychiatry in the media.2,4

So, what is required to regain the confidence of the general public? On a concrete level, psychiatry needs to advance goals and initiatives that address each of the factors noted; for example, by: (1) lobbying for more robust and better-funded research to develop more effective and better-tolerated treatments; (2) restraining the influence of pharmaceutical companies on psychiatric education and practice while seeking a healthier and more transparent relationship with such companies; (3) ensuring that comprehensive psychotherapy training is a central part of every psychiatric residency program; (4) bolstering “outreach” and public education efforts2 as well as improving communication with non-psychiatric physicians; and (5) rebutting unwarranted attacks on psychiatry while remaining receptive to constructive criticism from within and outside the profession.5

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
References: 

References

1. Pies RW. How American psychiatry can save itself. Psychiatr Times. 2012;29(2):1-10.
2. Friedman RA. The role of psychiatrists who write for popular media: experts, commentators, or educators? Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:757-759.
3. Mojtabai R, Olfson M. National trends in psychotherapy by office-based psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:962-970.
4. Sartorius N, Gaebel W, Cleveland HR, et al. WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists. World Psychiatry. 2010;9:131-144.
5. Pies R, Thommi S, Ghaemi SN. Getting it from both sides: foundational and anti-foundational critiques of psychiatry. Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry (AAPP) Bulletin. In press.
6. Mishara A, Schwartz MA. Who’s on first? Mental disorders by any other name? Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry (AAPP) Bulletin. 2010;17:60-63. http://alien.dowling.edu/~cperring/aapp/bulletin_v_17_2/37.doc. Accessed February 7, 2012.
7. Paris J. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue. In: Phillips J, Frances A, eds. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. In press.
8. Pierre J. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue. In: Phillips J, Frances A, eds. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. In press.
9. Pies R. Reclaiming our role as healers: a response to Prof. Kecmanovic. Psychiatr Danub. 2011;23:229-231.
10. Pies R, Geppert CM. Psychiatry encompasses much more than clinical neuroscience. Acad Med. 2009;84:1322.
11. Knoll JL 4th. Psychiatry: awaken and return to the path. Psychiatr Times. 2011;28(5)1-6. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1826785. Accessed February 7, 2012.

Related Articles

  • Toward Biomarker-Guided Treatment in Psychosis
  • Olfactory Functioning in First-Episode Psychosis
  • Digitally Tracking Patients With Schizophrenia: The Future Is Here
  • Tardive Dyskinesia Quiz: Scales, Syndromes, and Spontaneity
  • Treating the Sickest: Why Does the US Lag Behind?

Resource Topics rightRail

  • Resource Topics
  • Partner Content
ADHD
Schizophrenia
Bipolar Disorder
Geriatric Psychiatry
Major Depressive Disorder
Smart IOP – A New Kind of Intensive Outpatient Program
Three Things Mental Health Professionals Need to Know About Telemedicine – TODAY!
How Telemedicine Can Transform Patient Engagement

Current Issue

Psychiatric Times Vol 35 No 3
Mar 12, 2018 Vol 32 No 3
Digital Edition
Subscribe
Connect with Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Modern Medicine Network
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Advertiser Terms
  • Privacy statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Editorial & Advertising Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
Modern Medicine Network
© UBM 2018, All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.