Neuropsychiatric Masquerades
Neuropsychiatric Masquerades
By Manish A. Fozdar, MD
The mind-brain dichotomy has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past few hundred years. Clinically astute European neuropsychiatrists in the 18th and 19th centuries described various neuropsychiatric disorders based on observations of their patients. The most fitting example of these are descriptions of patients with neurosyphilis, also known in the 18th and 19th centuries as general paresis of the insane. This era was followed by Freudian influences on psychoanalytical theories. It is an interesting observation that, historically, schizophrenia was initially described by Emil Kraepelin as dementia praecox, an organic terminology. Psychoanalysts later attributed development of schizophrenia to a schizophrenogenic mother. Advances in the neurosciences in the past few decades have exonerated mothers worldwide by establishing a neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia.
The mind-brain dichotomy has created 2 different disciplines in medicine: neurology and psychiatry. The training of psychiatric residents has focused on identifying and treating behavioral and psychological symptoms based on a cookbook approach using DSM. Unfortunately, the inadequate training of psychiatric residents in neurology, especially in behavioral neurology, has future implications for clinical practice.
Avoiding diagnostic errors
Spitzer described 2 types of errors that lead to misdiagnosis as "functional" psychiatric disorders. These are informational errors (failure to gather clinical and historical data vital to make a correct diagnosis) and criterion errors (data are collected but the clinician fails to recognize the illness).1 Geschwind, arguably the progenitor of modern behavioral neurology, emphasized that an incomplete history taking and the failure to recognize regional brain syndromes leads to incorrect diagnoses.1 Tucker, another noted contemporary neuropsychiatrist, emphasized paying attention to the clinical course of the disease.1 Clinicians often rely heavily on fitting symptom clusters into diagnostic categories. There are also some systemic issues, such as insufficient time for evaluation, fragmented care, lack of communication between providers, and lack of adequate neurology training during residency training. Fortunately, for the purpose of diagnosis, there are certain clinical features that various organic psychiatric disorders tend to have in common.1 Bonhoeffer observed that different varieties of pathological conditions are often associated with similar forms of impairment.1 Psychiatric presentations of medical origin have certain features in common (Table 1).
Acute organic conditions usually have a fairly rapid onset and may present with cognitive deficits and fluctuating mental status, incoherent thought processes, lack of insight, perceptual disturbances, and delusions. Hallucinations are usually visual in organic conditions. In contrast, chronic organic conditions usually have an insidious onset. Family or coworkers may notice a general intellectual decline. Other common features are egocentricity, lack of concern for others, deterioration of personal hygiene, hoarding behavior, and slowed thinking.
Neurological disorders
There are certain clinical features specific to different cerebral regions. For example, frontal lobe disorders usually present with personality changes. These may include disinhibition or apathy (pseudomania and pseudodepression). Also common are lack of concern for others, lack of insight and judgment, and executive function deficits. Often the frontal lobe lesions are silent for a long time, ie, they can grow large before declaring themselves neurologically. Parietal lobe lesions usually cause complex cognitive deficits that are diffi- cult to detect on routine mental status examination or by using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Visuo-spatial difficulties, constructional dyspraxias, and topographical disorientation are common as are personality changes with intellectual and neurological deficits (Table 2).
Seizure disorders
There is a plethora of literature on the neuropsychiatric aspects of epilepsy1,2; only a few salient points are discussed here. An undiagnosed seizure disorder may disclose itself with delirium, bizarre behavior, and psychotic symptoms. Without a high index of clinical suspicion and aggressive diagnostic workup, seizure disorders may remain undiagnosed for a long period. Frontal lobe seizures often manifest with a bizarre clinical picture.1 Automatisms, such as rubbing, kicking, and arm flailing, may be present. Sexual automatisms, such as pelvic thrusting and genital manipulation, may be seen. The patient may engage in vocalizations, shouting, screaming, and disinhibited behaviors, which may lead to a misdiagnosis of mania, psychosis, or pseudoseizures.
I commend Dr. Fozdar on this integrative approach to neuropsychiatry, and I also agree with Dr. Driesen on the importance of integrating "mind"and "body" in our approach to both teaching and practice. Our residents--indeed, all of us--need more intensive instruction in neurology and neuropsychiatry, and we must be more active in bringing neuropsychiatric knowledge into our everyday practice habits--for example, by performing quick, neuropsychiatric screening tests on new patients (a simple heel-to-toe walking exercise can reveal a great deal about the patient's underlying brain integrity).
At the same time--and there is no paradox in this--our field must strengthen its connection to the humanities and social sciences, including more material during the residency years focusing on philosophy, anthropology, and literature. Yes, I know--this sounds impractical and utopian, and I acknowledge that my program may require a five-year residency. (I believe medical school could be condensed into three years). Yet in my view, such an integrated approach represents the best chance psychiatry has for survival as a medical specialty. I hope readers will take a look at the letter Dr. Cynthia Geppert and I co-authored on this subject. [Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10):1322. Psychiatry encompasses much more than clinical neuroscience. Pies R, Geppert CM.]
Best regards,
Ron Pies MD

I have practiced as a neuropsychiatrist since I started in the early 1970's. I also recognized early that other medical disorders also had psychiatric and neurological problems associated with them. I also taught many years as an adjunct professor and this has always been my approach. It requires a great deal of effort to stay up-to-date, but it has been worth it for my patients.
It never made sense to me to separate the mind from the brain and body. Things do not work that way in reality, and it seemed to me that patients would get treatments from doctors that only went after one set of symptoms. That does not work well for patients and leads to continuing problems in the future for many of them.
More training and education in behavioral neuroscience will lead students and practioners to the above conclusions.