PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home » Blogs » Couch in Crisis

Psychiatric Times.
 

Better Off In Prison?

A Psychiatrist Gains New Insight on the State of Behavioral Healthcare After Joining the Staff at a Wisconsin Prison

By H. Steven Moffic, MD | April 26, 2011

Ed Note: This article, originally published in Behavioral Healthcare (2010;30:26-29), has been chosen as a finalist for NIHCM Foundation’s Seventeenth Annual Health Care Journalism Awards. For the Behavioral Healthcare Web site and article, click here. For a related blog by Dr Moffic, see Wrestling With Evil in Prison Psychiatry.

When my clinic manager told me that prison may be the best place to practice psychiatry nowadays, I didn’t believe him. After all, prisons often seem like a world apart, often in isolated rural areas or in windowless, nondescript urban buildings.

Some mental health professionals feel that working in a prison is for second-rate clinicians who can’t get better work, as I once did, or that typical prisoners are sociopaths who cannot be treated successfully.

However, after working in prison psychiatry for six months now, I must say that my clinic manager may just be right, at least for this medium-security men’s prison in Wisconsin. There is much that the rest of our mental healthcare system, especially community mental health, can learn from what is in place in some prisons today.

Better access to care
Take access, for instance. Inadequate access for care has been a chronic problem in mental health, not only for the uninsured, but also for the minimally insured or those in tightly administered managed-care programs. As the current economic crisis reduces state Medicaid funding, more patients can’t find services and become progressively more dangerous, often ending up in jails or prison. This has been dubbed the “criminalization of mental illness.”

Once these individuals reach the prison system, however, access to mental healthcare is no longer a problem. In fact, access is easier for mental healthcare than for medical healthcare. There is no fee for mental healthcare, but there is a fee equivalent to a day’s work for non-emergency medical care. Mental health is a priority in prisons, in part because mental health conditions often connect to the behaviors that caused incarceration in the first place. Inmates identified as being “mentally ill” may also offer an alternative, and perhaps more acceptable, explanation to others regarding their criminal past.

Not only do prisoners who recognize they need mental healthcare have easy access, but those with undiagnosed mental health problems are more readily recognized by others because inmates are under constant observation. Of course, mental disorders can be viewed as an excuse for criminal behavior and a means of being “soft” toward prisoners, who are known to manipulate the system. Occasionally, this thinking results in an inmate with a mental health problem, such as impulsive ADHD behavior, ending up in the segregation unit instead of the psychiatrist’s office.

Access is especially important in prison due to the prevalence of mental health disorders. Up to 50 percent of inmates are thought to have some diagnosable psychiatric disorder, including alcohol(Drug information on alcohol) and substance abuse disorders.

Safety and security
Of course, access is meaningless unless both clinicians and patients feel-and are-safe. Clinicians can and do get hurt, or worse: Wayne Fenton, MD, was killed in 2006 while assessing a paranoid psychotic patient in his empty, private practice office on a weekend.

Though infrequent, there have also been violent incidents in the community mental health centers where I have worked, both in the clinic and outside in the parking lot. When funds were available, we hired a security guard, but often we couldn’t afford it. I had assumed that working in a prison would be more risky, and I worried that my counter-transference of feelings of fear for my patients could limit my responsiveness to them.

However, security is the first priority of prisons, and, as it turns out, there hasn’t been a dangerous incident involving a healthcare clinician in more than 20 years. The prior psychiatrist warned me that deer jumping on the roadway are more dangerous to me than the inmates visiting the prison medical office.

Throughout my 35-year career, I’ve sought to find a practice setting where family practitioners, psychiatrists, and other mental healthcare clinicians work together. And, to my surprise, here it is-in prison!

The quality of all the staff seems equivalent to what I’ve known outside of prison. Among the psychiatrists in this Wisconsin system are two former department chairs of well-known medical schools. One is known for his work with the homeless, and the other for his work with aggressive behavior.

Our salary meets or exceeds that of facilities outside the prison system. Productivity standards are not excessive, as they sometimes are in community mental health settings.

The prison population
Despite the high level of security, everything is in place to provide competent treatment. Among the disorders that a prison psychiatrist sees are:

•Antisocial personality disorder, which is clearly associated with criminal behavior and a lack of remorse. Psychiatrists don’t see many cases outside of prison because patients with this disorder don’t feel they need help or manipulate their way out of treatment.
•Malingering, a diagnosis often associated with antisocial personality disorder in the DSM-IV, which I have never considered as often as I do now.
•Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). I have found that a significant percentage of those thought to be primarily sociopathic often have an extensive history of trauma and a subsequent onset of post-traumatic stress disorder. The trauma is especially common in African-American males, who are heavily overrepresented in prison systems. One has to be careful here because it is so hard to be sure that reported trauma actually took place due to the possibility of fabrication and limited access to information from family and friends.
•Narcissistic personality disorder appears to be quite common among prisoners as well.
•A large group of prisoners also have the expected alcohol and substance abuse disorders, which are often at the root of their criminal behavior and subsequent imprisonment.
•Bipolar disorder. This is sometimes seen after prisoners get “clean” from substance abuse for the first time in many years. Manic behavior associated with bipolar disorder sometimes led to substance abuse as the individual attempted to self-medicate the mood swings.
•ADHD is overrepresented in prisoners, and is frequently seen in the core symptom of impulsivity. Another ADHD symptom-poor concentration at work and school-often contributes to subsequent crime.
•Schizophrenia. There seems to be a smaller, but still significant, percentage of the chronic and severely mentally ill inmates, including schizophrenics. In many cases, prisons have assumed the role once held by state hospitals, from which schizophrenic patients were discharged in the 1970s into often inadequate community-based treatment.

Besides the disorders that inmates have upon arrival, there are other disorders that tend to develop within the prison environment. Depressive disorders secondary to loss and separation from the outside world are common. Anxiety related to fears about prison life and the future are also common. Inmates traumatized by other inmates may experience PTSD or a triggering of memories of earlier trauma.

Treating inmate disorders
Several common challenges must be overcome before effective treatment can be provided. Prisoners tend to mistrust authority figures, including clinicians. Given that clinicians desire to help people and be healers, working with those who have done the opposite can elicit intense feelings such as antipathy or even horror. For clinicians, those feelings must be processed and accepted.

Nowadays, the application of psychotherapy is as limited in prison as it is outside. Medication is the mainstay of treatment, though any medications that can be abused or diverted to other prisoners are strictly limited. In Wisconsin many medications are prohibited, including benzodiazepines and stimulants. Seroquel, which I had not realized was subject to abuse, is another prohibited medication.

Given the high costs of housing and securing prisoners, states seek to control other costs, including medication. Thus, less expensive, generic medications are always preferred, as their usage has less suicide risks and fewer metabolic side effects.

For the treatment of those with substance abuse disorders, we have a four-month residential facility. Such settings are virtually unavailable nowadays outside of a prison, except for the very expensive celebrity rehab facilities.

The treatment of schizophrenic patients can be especially distressing in prison. Fortunately, the rest of the inmates tend to leave these “crazies” alone rather than victimize them. Some schizophrenic inmates don’t seem to mind staying in prison. One such patient said to me: “Doc, I like it here. I hope I don’t have to leave. I wouldn’t mind coming back if I do. I have a place to stay, three squares, and medical care.” Finding adequate community mental health resources for inmates who complete their sentences is perhaps our greatest challenge in planning discharges.

I find that some of the most difficult prisoners to treat are those with Adult ADHD, since the best ADHD medication has very limited availability due to its potential for abuse. Some have suggested that separate housing units be developed for such inmates. However, earlier diagnosis and better treatment options outside of prison can help reduce the impulsivity, substance abuse, or social exclusion that leads to criminal behavior in the first place.

Conclusions
So, are those with mental illness better off in prison? Given the various states of prisons in the U.S. and the world, ranging from the bare-bones barracks and occasional riots in California to the hotel-like settings and services in Austrian prisons, some patients are and some patients aren’t.

Am I, and other clinicians like me, better off in prison? As of now, it certainly seems so. I not only can provide as high or higher quality treatment in the prison setting, but I’ve been challenged by situations that I’ve never encountered before and learned things I couldn’t have learned anywhere else.

Helping those who have hurt others can be the ultimate test for a healer. When my treatment is successful, I have the satisfaction of knowing that I may have reduced the typical 70 percent recidivism rate by motivating a former inmate to change his life’s course, perhaps in a way that saves the lives or property of other citizens. This feeling makes me wonder if most mental health clinicians or administrators wouldn’t be better off after spending a little time in prison.

Comparing prison psychiatry and community psychiatry

 

Prison

Community

Access to care

No insurance required; rapid access with little or no cost

Coverage required; significant waiting times are common

Integrated primary/mental healthcare, with on-site psychiatrist

Sometimes available

Rarely available

Productivity expectations

Generally appropriate

Sometimes excessive, especially under tightly managed plans

Medication availability

Generally limited, includes only generics and medications with low abuse potential

Unlimited, based on prescriber’s preference, formulary provided in coverage, or patient ability to pay

Substance abuse treatment

Long-term, residential treatment often available on site without long waits

Off-site residential treatment may require wait time and significant out-of-pocket costs

Vulnerability to violent behavior

Extremely low due to high security, constant observation, and prior knowledge of violent patients’ histories

Varied, based on funding for on-site security, knowledge of patient history, office staffing, and layout

 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Steve Moffic | May 03, 2011 11:57 AM EDT

On a different issue from that of confidentiality, it was informally pointed out to me that I used too strong a term, "prohibit", to describe the availability of certain medications that are more readily abused or diverted in prison. At the very least, I should have wrote that they are "virtually prohibited"or strongly discouraged, or that there are exceptions to this principle, for indeed some patients in our Wisconsin prison system are on one of them. Maybe my mistake was a reflection of my own internal prohibition about using such medication anymore in prisons. They seem too risky and/or there are other options.

In fact, two years later after this blog was first written, confronting this issue in prison has made me even more sensitive to how such medications may be used or misused outside of prison, and how consequently I have been much more careful of prescribing them anywhere. For example, even though I am viewed as having some expertise in Adult Attention Deficit Disorder, I will not prescribe stimulants unless my diagnosis is confirmed by some sophisticated neuropsychological testing. The diversion of stimulants in colleges, and even the workplace, seems to be escalating so much that we are now debating whether such medications can be used as "neuroenhancers". But that ethical debate is for another time.

by susan kweskin | May 02, 2011 3:19 PM EDT

Dr Moffic made the following comment:

Thanks so much for this comment on the challenge of confidentality in prison systems. As I went back to review what I had written, you are absolutely right to point out that I had ignored an important clinical issue that might differ in prisons. Such feedback helps to make blogs so worthwhile to write.

If the commentor has time, it would be useful to let us know more of how observing a modified Miranda warning affected the clinical care. Also, was this something that was told had to be followed, and by whom?

In my particular setting, I was not told anything about this as I was first oriented to my medium-security state prison. What I learned over time is what could be described as a much broader interpretation of the Tarasoff decision, that if I found out anything that might endanger other inmates or correctional officers, that should be reported to security. Actually, all the inmates already know this, so they don't share information about sexual interactions with other inmates, smuggling of contraband, power plays, etc. I haven't discovered many instances where such withholding of information seems to adversely influence my treatment of the inmates. Usually, I still find out enough about their history (often through their criminal records), symptoms, and behavior to know how to proceed with medication, though with extra caution. On occasion, when behavior that they might have - but didn't - told me gets them in trouble, then I find out.

As I contemplate this issue, I'm not sure if such alteration in confidentiality is better or worse for psychiatric patients in prison. I think the bigger challenge, both inside and outside of prison, is to get through all the reservations (conscious and unconscious defenses, distrust of authority, etc.) that prevents sharing of useful information. The psychoanalysts have had a term for this, establishing a "holding environment" where the patient feels safe enough to convey disturbing information about themselves. I have to conclude that such an environment is harder to establish in prison.

Steven Moffic, M.D.

by S Many | April 29, 2011 12:21 PM EDT

Dr. Moffic's thoughtful commentary ignores one fundamental aspect of the physician-patient relationship. Need you guess? It is called "confidentiality."Already compromised in psychiatric practice, in no other setting (except perhaps the military) is it so problematic. During my own short stint in a max security facility in NY I observed what is currently a virtual necessity; a modified Miranda warning which preserves a vestige of reality: '"Whatever you say or do, may be used against you!"
www.smpsych.com

by Ronald Pies | April 27, 2011 1:39 PM EDT

Kudos to Dr. Moffic on this enlightening piece, which calls attention not only to health care in prisons, but also to the lack of available care for many on the "outside". I hope all psychiatrists will work toward a system of publicly-funded, universal insurance coverage, such as the plan proposed by Physicians for a National Health Program (www.pnhp.org).

Best regards, Ron Pies MD

Article Comment Pages: 1 2 3 Previous







 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Journey of the Traumatized Hero: Kerouac’s On the Road and Gandhi’s Railroad Ride
  • Eco-Psychiatry: Why We Need to Keep the Environment in Mind
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Cultural Psychiatry and the 'No-Chicken' Doctor
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy