PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register
PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home » Blogs » Moffic

Psychiatric Times.
 

Is it Time for Re-institutionalization?

By H. Steven Moffic, MD | April 20, 2012

“All things in moderation” –Benjamin Franklin

I can just sense the uproar now. Dr Moffic wants state hospitals again? Has he lost it? Well, yes. I do, sort of. Here’s why.

Recently, I was asked to write a request to possibly extend the outpatient commitment of a patient of mine. What for, I said to myself? This would be a waste of time because he had not exhibited any more dangerous behavior, was taking care of himself, and was compliant with his intramuscular medication. However, when as part of the ongoing monitoring of my patient’s improvement, I asked him to rate on a 0-10 (best) scale how well the medication was working, he said “0”. When I asked why, he said it was because he didn’t need the medication. Uh, oh, I thought. Could this be Anosognosia? Or, has he read or heard of Robert Whitaker’s book, Anatomy of an Epidemic (2010), which discusses the potential long-term risks of such medications.

There’s no way he’ll be committed longer, but will he stay on the medication voluntarily? Without it he’d surely relapse into psychosis and possible dangerousness. If he then went inpatient again, would he only stay a few days, not enough to address his ideas about the medication? It didn’t help enough the first time around.

Then, there recently was another patient of mine, somewhat on the other end of the hospitalization question. As an outpatient, she was reluctant to stay on her helpful SSRI, especially when she claimed GI Symptoms of unclear etiology. Bouncing back and forth between outpatient psychiatry, GI evaluations, and now almost seeming delusional, I referred her to an inpatient unit for quicker assessment and treatment. However, despite being willing, and having good insurance coverage, she was turned down over and over. The reasons were that hey only took those with acute needs and safety concerns.

These cases left me wondering. Have we gone too far in making it difficult to hospitalize someone, and are our hospitalizations generally too short anyways to help clarify diagnosis and carefully make any medication adjustments?

To try to answer that for myself, I thought I’d personally reflect back on almost 50 years of deinstitutionalization, which parallels my career and the dismantling of the state psychiatric hospitals in favor of community mental health centers, which in turn were often dismantled.

1962. In high school, I worked as an aide at a long-term residential facility for children and adolescents. As an activities helper, it was fun, but their behavior seemed to become institutionalized. Would they ever get out and lead more normal lives?

1965. I was in a psychology class at the University of Michigan with my future wife and we visited Northville State Hospital. A ward was teeming with patients, quite psychotic and disheveled. No, I don’t think we want to re-institutionalize to that.

1970. I was a medical student at Yale and did my psychiatry rotation at the renowned Connecticut Mental Health Center on an attractive ward, with lots of high powered, knowledgeable staff. Length of stay seemed to vary between a couple of weeks and a couple of months. Also in town was the Yale Psychiatric Institute, where stays for private patients were even much longer, not infrequently longer than a year, and more based on psychoanalytic psychotherapy.

1972-75. I obtain my psychiatric residency training at the University of Chicago. They even have an inpatient ward solely for adolescents, where my wife gets a teaching job. No wonder I think back most fondly on this institution.

1976-77. I’m in the Army with my first job as a trained psychiatrist, at Fort McClellan, Alabama. No psychiatric ward here, but we could hospitalize the less severe on the medical ward (with the more severe evacuated to a larger base). I’m a bit surprised that this integration with medicine worked out as well as it did.

1977-89. I’m starting my academic career at Baylor College of Medicine and become Medical Director of a large community mental health center. Even though the state hospital in Austin has deinstitutionalized, there are very few inpatient beds in Houston itself. We make due, but there are many homeless as a consequence.

1989. I begin my second academic job at the Medical College of Wisconsin. A smaller city than Houston, but it had about six times the number of inpatient beds for the poor. The for-profit private hospitals emerge with reports of “bounty hunters” rounding up adolescents and the intoxicated for hospital stays as long as their good insurance allowed. And they didn’t seem to improve accordingly.

1995. Managed care became established in Milwaukee and stops authorizing and paying for these private for-profit hospitalizations, and one by one they close. Whatever hospitalizations are left go down to a few days, or at best a week or two. There is no corresponding increase in outpatient services. Medication follow-ups by psychiatrists dwindle to 15 minutes about every 3 months. The revolving door begins. I write the book The Ethical Way: Challenges and Solutions for Managed Behavioral Healthcare (1997, Jossey-Bass) to try to make therapeutic sense of all these changes.

2009. I go to work part-time in a state medium security prison. I find out that about half the prison population has a DSM psychiatric and/or AODA diagnosis. They receive more treatment than I can provide in our public sector clinic in Milwaukee. This is what has been called trans-institutionalization, whereby the mentally ill do into jail and prison instead of a psychiatric hospital.

2012. After several years of a worsening economy, there is downsizing and closings of psychiatric facilities all over the country. The “recovery” model gains ascendancy as a response. We are supposed to pay special attention to patient’s desires, but what if they desire more help than resources allow?

So, after 50 years of deinstitutionalization followed by trans-institutionalization, after traditional antipsychotics followed by atypical antipsychotics, and for-profit hospitals followed by for-profit managed care companies, where are we left? I know I won’t find out at this year’s APA meeting. Only one symposium is devoted to inpatient treatment, and this on acute, brief stays, and one workshop. But I do hear of a new public hospital being built in Massachusetts, “the birthplace of modern recovery in psychiatry,” that will replace three state hospitals. Another new one is planned for Vermont. There are a variety of respite centers being tested out. And, by now, we have better tools for assessing the levels of care needed and for how long. The most comprehensive and public are the Locus system for adults and children developed by the American Association of Community Psychiatrists.

If we can learn anything from this history, it is to repeat it in an improved way.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by James Knoll | May 17, 2012 11:58 AM EDT

Thank you Dr. Moffic for raising this important topic! I hope that the plans in Mass and VT come to fruition. Unfortunately, few outside of mental health are familiar with Penrose's theory......

by Steve Moffic | May 17, 2012 4:48 PM EDT

Thank you, Jim. But enlighten us when you have a chance; I'm afraid I am one of those not familiar with Penrose's theory, and would rather hear about it from you than Google.

by Renata Pilatova | May 22, 2012 9:20 AM EDT

I work at a large state institution for developmentally disabled - the last on in the state. We have about 500 individuals who can't be placed in the community due to the lack of supports. We have seen some unfortunate outcomes when some people left and lost all the supports we provide. We are the last resort safety net for the popukation you are talking about. Our mental health clinics and a state psychiatric hospital are being closed. I am also providing some developmental- behavioral pediatric care in the community - and there is absolutely nowhere to go for my patients due to their age. Not one psychiatrist in the community will se a dual diagnosis patient, especially a child, especially if he/she is on Medicaid. They are out of luck. To get admitted to our institution even for short period of time takes literally an act of Congress.

by Steve Moffic | May 22, 2012 11:31 AM EDT

Thanks for the example of the developmentally disabled. I've been treating some as outpatients and agree with your assessment from that side of the problem.

by Marcia Myers | May 24, 2012 1:47 PM EDT

It's been clear to me for many years that here in America, "land of the free,"there are many who should not be "free" as they lack the basic mental skills/health to function in society. Sometimes the issue is psychosis, sometimes bipolar disorder, or sometimes developmental delay to the extent the individual is unable to care for themselves. Where do many of these people end up? On the streets, in jail, or dead.

From 1987 to 1996 I worked part-time in an inpatient "therapeutic community" and I can still remember at least a dozen "revolving door" patients: they'd come in off their meds, delusional, filthy and hungry. We'd keep them for 10 to 14 days, get them stabilized, discharge them when insurance said we had to, and then in 4 to 6 weeks the police would bring them back to us again. What kind of life is that? Sure, they were "free" to make choices, but mentally they were incapable of making those choices.

Now society is seeing a great rise in the number of autistic children, and at some point in the future many of those kids are going to need care and support services. Today those services don't exist.

Yes, we need to see a return of institutionalization for certain populations; institutions where the fragile and vulnerable will not only be safe but be given the resources to maximize what they can do with their lives. Surely in the long run that would be cheaper than prisons, courts, lawyers, etc. as a way to care for those who minds are not able to deal society.

Article Comment Pages: 1 2 Next







 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • The Role of Biological Tests in Psychiatric Diagnosis
  • You Are—And Your Mood Is—What You Eat
  • Experts Discuss Changes, Updates in DSM-5
  • The Paradox of Choice: When More Medications Mean Less Treatment
  • Will Your Clinical Records Support You in Court?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • The Paradox of Choice: When More Medications Mean Less Treatment
  • Experts Discuss Changes, Updates in DSM-5
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Tie One On for Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy