PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register
PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home » Blogs » Moffic

Psychiatric Times.
 

Mass Murder and Psychiatry

By H. Steven Moffic, MD | December 17, 2012

Tragedy in NewtownThere has been increasing publicity about the imminent end of the world on December 21, 2012, as possibly posited in the Mayan Calendar. What we do know for sure, is that for all the young children and adults who were killed in Newtown, Connecticut, their world ended a week earlier, on December 14th.

As the play of the same name by Thornton Wilder, Newtown Is Our Town.

(MORE: Will 2013 Be a Lucky Year for Psychiatry?)

The perpetrator must be, in some way, everyman. We must be our brother's keepers. Any field that can contribute to the understanding and prevention of the increasing numbers of attempted and successful mass murders in the United States must work on this for the next weeks, months, and years. Psychiatry is surely one of these.

Diagnosis
Amidst all the initial speculation on the reasons for the tragedy, my wife noticed an e-mail from a psychiatrist that struck us as possibly revealing deeper issues, some perhaps indirectly relevant. The subject was “Autism not a Mental Illness.” Autism was one of the initial diagnoses associated with this killer. Beyond such premature diagnostic speculations, the e-mail was reacting to a CNN coverage in which a physician and a reporter discussed that autism may not be an illness, since NIMH was considering autism and other mental conditions as “neurogenerative.” Perhaps, the e-mailer suggested, if autism was not considered to be a mental illness, would that be better because then, if the murderer did not have a mental illness, mental illness could not be blamed for the mass murder.

This argument, though cumbersome, leads us to take a step back and take a bit of a detour. First of all, there are no mental illnesses, at least so far as the terminology goes for the DSM and ICD classifications of mental conditions. This is more important than mere semantics. These conditions are called disorders, not illnesses or diseases. The prime definition of disorders, in my Webster’s dictionary, is “confusion.”

However “disorder” is defined, it causes mental conditions to appear to be different from medical illnesses. It implies that clinicians other than psychiatrists can be expert in the diagnosis and treatment of those disorders. Indeed, that is one of the issues that I was concerned about in the March 2010 blog, “The DSM Process: More Questions Than Answers.” The cautionary statement as to who can make a diagnosis reads: “It can be used by a wide range of health and mental health professionals, including psychiatrists and other physicians, psychologists, social workers, nurses occupational and rehabilitation therapists and counselors.”

So much for the medical expertise of psychiatrists in making a diagnosis. As far as I know, that consideration will not change in the upcoming DSM-5.

This is a scenario that is more likely to lead to an inadequate diagnosis or missed diagnosis. Moreover, diagnosis, though necessary for reimbursement, research, and a general sense of what is wrong, should only be the necessary, but not sufficient, step in understanding an individual. Adequate time and analysis is required. As the bio-psycho-social model implies, we have to look far and wide to try to understand anyone. If indeed the perpetrator of the Newtown tragedy fell on the Autism spectrum, how often does a mass murderer have that diagnosis?

Guns
As so many have commented, the ease of obtaining automatic weapons can indeed contribute to mass destruction. If someone has untreated mental problems, the risk also increases. Adding guns and knowing how to use them, to someone with apparent mental problems, surely increases the odds of something bad happening.

Any positive reinforcement of gun use, outside of controlled situations such as hunting, may cause more unnecessary harm than benefit. Certainly, we have a lot of positive reinforcement and modeling of a gun culture in our Constitution, our seemingly endless war, and violence in the media. The more impersonal ways of relating on the internet may veer us more toward the social deficits and lack of empathy that is characteristic of the Autism spectrum.

Evil
I never used the term evil professionally or personally until I worked in prison part time at the end of my clinical career. For many of the inmates I saw, mental disorders, including substance abuse, seemed to play a significant role in their crimes. Gang involvement, where self-esteem and identity, was enhanced through group process, was another significant factor for many. On a rare occasion, neither a mental disorder, including antisocial personality disorder, nor gang behavior, seemed to be enough of an explanation.1 That is when I began to think more seriously of evil, as did many in the aftermath of this recent tragedy. The Governor of Connecticut claimed that “evil visited this community . . . .” Later he expanded that to mental illness dressed in evil. Perhaps that can be further expanded to mental illness dressed in evil and a holster.

Recommendations
Soon after the tragedy, one of the fathers of a child killed tearfully pleaded for society to learn from what happened in order to prevent future mass murders. Here’s what I think psychiatry can contribute:

• Autism, Asperger, and most every other mental condition worthy of our prime focus should be called diseases, not disorders
• All such diagnoses should be made or certified by a psychiatrist to qualify for medical insurance coverage
• Do not make public diagnoses of anyone not personally examined, per our Goldwater Rule
• This tragedy, following too many others, should spur further study of where criminal behavior ends and psychiatric disease begins, if indeed there is even such a line
• All psychiatrists should spend some clinical time in a correctional institution, either during residency or later for continuing education
• Find better ways to educate the public about the early signs of homicidal risk
• Advocate for a system of safe reporting of those felt to be at- risk for homicidal behavior
• Provide better resources in order to improve early treatment of homicidal ideation
• Convene a representative body of those injured by public violence and loved ones of those murdered, to work on a national Task Force to reduce mass murder
• Advocate for a special anniversary date or holiday, December 14th, to not only remember the Connecticut tragedy or others like it, but also as a way to monitor how we are doing as a nation and a profession in trying to prevent more such tragedies.

Reference
1. Moffic HS. Better Off in Prison; 2011. Psychiatric Times. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/couchincrisis/content/article/10168/1850954. Accessed December 17, 2012.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 12, 2013 8:08 AM EST

Hmm, Dr. O'brien. The dreaded question I was awaiting. Well, I applauded those churches that rang 28 bells instead of 26 a week later. It is hard to imagine that Adam Lanza was mainly responsible for his life and completely responsible for his choices, but then again, we just don't know enough about him. Probably his father and brother could tell us the most, but even then, do they know if he was having command hallucinations or some sort of delusions? One of Loughton's victims in Arizona forgave him.

So, I would probably consider Adam Lanza a paradoxical victim of sorts. Would you not, given your analysis of the mother's role in this?

When I worked with young African-American males in prison, and found out about verifiable severe trauma in their childhoods, along with limited options to get past that, I felt they, too, were victims of sorts. Or, what about prisoners who do horrible things and are found to have certain kinds of changes in their brains?

How much personal free will do people like that have? If they are "evil", can that be helped in any way? Sociopaths probably not, but many of those I saw seemed to have underlying severe trauma, though by no means all of them. Not an easy question to answer simply yes or no.

by James OBrien | January 11, 2013 7:46 PM EST

I'm curious, do you consider Adam Lanza a victim as well?

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 10, 2013 4:41 PM EST

Ann Sparks,

Thank you for your comment. I'm still struggling with defining and finding "evil", but no trouble agreeing with you that we should be using a bio-psycho-social-SPIRITUAL model of care for most anything medical or psychiatric.

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 10, 2013 4:39 PM EST

For Dr. O'Brien,

Stable should be "unstable". Freudian slip?

Then, again, unless we hear more from people who knew how she viewed her son, her view of him - conscious or unconscious - is all speculation.

Certainly, you are right about securing the guns, but here, too, we don't know how that was handled yet (or ever).

Most mothers who have a severely mentally ill child usually try to take care of them as best they can, often at home, and even alone, until they realize that is not helping and may even be harmful and risky. Maybe this mother would have reached that conclusion eventually, too.

by James OBrien | January 10, 2013 4:35 PM EST

So spot on about evil. I would add that it's impossible to make value judgments about "good" without acknowledging the existence of its ugly cousin.

The presence of absence of a spiritual life in this family is not something we are likely to hear about from the media. We know all about the Bushmaster, we know nothing about how Lanza learned right from wrong, if he ever did.

The saying that all happy families are alike is true. There are two or three ways to make a happy family, there are millions of ways to screw it up. It is patently obvious that the mother blew it as a parent and and community member, and I find it frustrating that this permissive insistence on moral equivalence makes it a thought crime to call someone out for blame. This is nothing but intellectually vapid moral vanity and a form of enabling in its own right.

Article Comment Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next


Also by Dr Moffic

Once a Psychiatrist, Always a Psychiatrist?

Mental Bootcamp: Today Is the First Day of Your Retirement!

How to End a Psychiatric Epidemic: The Redemption of Psychiatry

Psychism: Defining Discrimination of Psychiatry

Psychiatric Eulogies for Psychiatrists Who Inspired

Mass Murder and Psychiatry

The Psychology of Guns: 12 Steps Toward More Safety

Will 2013 Be a Lucky Year for Psychiatry?






 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • The Role of Biological Tests in Psychiatric Diagnosis
  • You Are—And Your Mood Is—What You Eat
  • Experts Discuss Changes, Updates in DSM-5
  • The Paradox of Choice: When More Medications Mean Less Treatment
  • Will Your Clinical Records Support You in Court?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • The Paradox of Choice: When More Medications Mean Less Treatment
  • Experts Discuss Changes, Updates in DSM-5
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Tie One On for Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy