Psychiatric Times.
No. 4
Prevention and Treatment of Addiction
By Ahmed Elkashef, MD and Timothy P. Condon, PhD |
April 1, 2008
Dr Elkashef is chief of the clinical/medical branch, division of research and development, at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Dr Condon is associate director of the NIDA. The authors report no conflicts of interest regarding the topic of this article.
The next decades will witness the approval of medications currently in early development to treat various phases of addiction. Potential candidates include a CRF antagonist, a CB1 receptor antagonist, and a D3 partial agonist. All hold great promise for sustaining abstinence or preventing relapse. Examples of marketed medications being tested for treating withdrawal and facilitating early abstinence in patients who are actively using addictive drugs include buspirone(Drug information on buspirone) and nefazodone(Drug information on nefazodone) for marijuana, and bupropion, modafinil(Drug information on modafinil), and extended-release methylphenidate(Drug information on methylphenidate) for stimulants.11 These are all in proof of concept or confirmatory trials as potential antiaddiction medications.
In the next decade, our understanding of the phenotypes of patients who are addicted will be greatly enhanced through research that is aimed at defining and measuring aspects of the social environment—culture, neighborhoods, schools, families, and peer groups—to better understand how genes can mitigate or amplify social influences that are known to powerfully affect individual choices and behaviors related to substance abuse. Complementing these efforts, NIDA will focus on pharmacogenomics, the study of how genes regulate an individual's response to drugs and medications. Clinical and genetic biomarkers are being pursued in genetic research and in pharmacogenetic studies and are being incorporated into enrichment medication and behavioral treatment trials. This research not only will illuminate the physiological mechanisms of drug abuse and addiction but also has the potential to empower clinicians by helping them tailor pharmaceutical interventions to a subgroup of the addicted population who will optimally respond to such treatment—from selecting the most effective medication and dosage regimen to anticipating and avoiding adverse effects.17
Immunotherapy is another very promising area, reflected in interim analysis data from the nicotine(Drug information on nicotine) vaccine trial. In the next 3 to 5 years, we may have an approved vaccine for smoking cessation. Similar efforts are being pursued for cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin vaccines. Monoclonal antibody research is still at the preclinical phase, but early data are encouraging and may possibly result in an approved monoclonal antibody to treat cocaine, methamphetamine, or PCP overdoses in emergency departments in the next decade.
Other treatments on the horizon offer promise for affecting the conditioned responses to drugs that go hand in hand with addiction and lead to relapse even after long periods of abstinence. New therapies include those targeting extinction, or the unlearning of conditioned responses,23,24 and neurofeedback, the use of noninvasive real-time brain imaging technologies to teach patients to regulate neural activity in specific brain regions.25 These novel approaches will take advantage of new technologies, medications, and basic and behavioral research to help us understand and modify the circuitry affected by addiction—part of a wider network in which pathways influence one another in highly complex ways.
For prevention research, the next decade holds promise for better identification of addiction vulnerabilities and high-risk populations based on family history, personality traits, and genetic markers, as these become better characterized. New findings will generate more effective early interventions, which, in turn, should have tremendous effect in preventing development of the full-blown disease. Family and school-based interventions, alone and in combination, offer promising prevention techniques that will be more widely applicable in the next decade.
There is hope for the future of the treatment of addiction, with the political landscape and the public's understanding and acceptance of addiction as a brain disease already changing. It is our hope that this will translate into funding for addiction research and treatment. Our work is cut out for us however:
• Understanding the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in influencing addiction risk will help identify those who are particularly vulnerable to the rewarding effects of drugs.
• Findings will aid the development of increasingly refined prevention strategies directed at selectively mitigating a patient's specific risk factors.
• In a similar vein, identifying patient characteristics that predict the relative efficacy of specific treatment interventions will allow treatment providers to better match patients with treatment services.
• And finally, the development of medications to curb craving—at the forefront of efforts to help drug-addicted patients establish and maintain abstinence in treatment—will be critical to effectively counter chronic, compulsive drug taking.
The reward to society will be tremendous, with many individual lives restored and families reunited. We will see fewer crimes and less jail crowding, fewer new cases of HIV infection and hepatitis C, more productive persons, and healthier and safer communities.
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. NIH publication 07-5605. Printed April 2007.
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Preventing Drug Use among Children and Adolescents: A Research-Based Guide. 2nd ed. NIH publication 04-4212(A). Printed October 2003.
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment, A Research-Based Guide. NIH publication 00-4180. Printed July 2000.
References
1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies; 2007. NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS publication SMA 07-4293.
2. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President.
The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States: 1992-2002. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President; 2004. Publication 207303.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses--United States, 1997-2001.
MMWR. 2005;54:625-628.
4. Harwood H. Updating estimates of the economic costs of alcohol abuse in the United States: estimates, update methods, and data report. Bethesda, Md: Lewin Group for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2000. NIH publication 98-4327.
5. Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Lifetime comorbidity of
DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:247-257.
6. Condon TP. Reflecting on 30 years of research. A look at how NIDA has advanced the research, prevention, and treatment of drug abuse and addiction.
Behav Healthc. 2006;26:14, 16.
7. National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment, A Research-Based Guide. FAQ 11--"Is Drug Addiction Treatment Worth Its Cost?" Available at:
http://www.nida.nih.gov/PODAT/PODAT6.html. Accessed February 6, 2008.
8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1995-2005. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies; 2007. DASIS Series S-37, DHHS publication SMA 07-4234.
9. Bolla KI, Eldreth DA, London ED, et al. Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task.
Neuroimage. 2003; 19:1085-1094.
10. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Begleiter H, et al. High levels of dopamine D
2 receptors in unaffected members of alcoholic families: possible protective factors.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:999-1008.
11. Vocci FJ, Acri J, Elkashef A. Medication development for addictive disorders: the state of the science.
Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1432-1440.
12. Nunes EV, Sullivan M, Levin FR. Treatment of depression in patients with opiate dependence.
Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56:793-802.
13. Allen JP, Litten RZ, Fertig JB. NIDA-NIAAA workshop: efficacy of therapies in drug and alcohol addiction. Strategies for treatment of alcohol problems.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31:665-669.
14. McCambridge J, Strang J. Development of a structured generic drug intervention model for public health purposes: a brief application of motivational interviewing with young people.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2003;22:391-399.
15. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals. Clinical trials. NicVAX® (nicotine conjugate vaccine). Available at:
http://www.nabi.com/pipeline/clinicaltrials.php#3. Accessed February 11, 2008.
16. Elkashef A, Biswas J, Acri JB, Vocci F. Biotechnology and the treatment of addictive disorders: new opportunities.
BioDrugs. 2007;21:259-267.
17. Rutter JL. Symbiotic relationship of pharmacogenetics and drugs of abuse.
AAPS J. 2006;8:E174-E184.
18. Rose JE, Behm FM, Westman EC, et al. PET studies of the influences of nicotine on neural systems in cigarette smokers.
Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:323-333.
19. Spoth RL, Clair S, Shin C, Redmond C. Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:876-882.
20. Slater MD, Kelly KJ, Edwards RW, et al. Combining in-school and community-based media efforts: reducing marijuana and alcohol uptake among younger adolescents.
Health Educ Res. 2006;21:157-176.
21. United Nations, Office on Drugs and Crime. Executive summary. In:
2007 World Drug Report. New York: United Nations; 2007.
22. Manchikanti L. Prescription drug abuse: What is being done to address this new drug epidemic? Testimony before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources.
Pain Physician. 2006;9:287-321.
23. Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, et al. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: use of D-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61: 1136-1144.
24. Kelamangalath L, Swant J, Stramiello M, Wagner JJ. The effects of extinction training in reducing the reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior: involvement of NMDA receptors.
Behav Brain Res. 2007;185:119-128.
25. deCharms RC, Maeda F, Glover GH, et al. Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102:18626-18631.