Psychiatric Times.
No. 9
Trama & Violence
Intimate Partner Violence: Practical Issues for Psychiatrists
New Findings in Intimate Partner Violence
By Alison M. Heru, MD
|
August 1, 2008
Dr Heru is associate professor of medicine at National Jewish Medical and Research Center and associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Denver. The author reports that she has no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.
What about couples who present in an outpatient setting requesting help with intimate partner violence? Both sex-specific treatment and conjoint 14-week group treatment have been shown to be effective for outpatient couples with husband-to-wife repeated acts of physical aggression.
32 In this study, both treatment groups followed a cognitive-behavioral program that focused on psychoeducation, anger-control techniques, and communication skills. Both groups reported a reduction of physical violence posttreatment and at 1-year follow-up, although only 25% of husbands remained violence- free. The only difference found between groups was that husbands in conjoint treatment had improved marital satisfaction.
Several untested treatments of intimate partner violence exist. Virginia Goldner,
33 at the Ackerman Institute for Family Therapy in New York, has used attachment and feminist theory, especially the work of Jessica Benjamin, and views the work of the family therapist as inserting a moral perspective. Goldner highlights clinical multiplicity, with abuse and coercion coexisting alongside intense love and genuine friendship. Goldner believes that the mutative factor in any therapy includes “bearing witness and helping the abuser accept responsibility for his actions” and describes the role of the therapist as helping “clients develop a rich psychological understanding of the abuse” without blame or shame and without letting the perpetrators avoid responsibility for their actions.
Jory and Anderson
34 practice couples therapy based on “accountability and a theory of intimate justice.” They simultaneously engage the victim of abuse and the abuser by creating 2 therapeutic environments: one affirming the victim and one challenging the abuser. Lastly, solution-focused treatment for domestic violence offenders offers a “strengths perspective, a solution-focused approach, holding a person accountable for solutions instead of focusing on problems.”
35 When should couples therapy be considered? The essential components of safe couples treatment includes adequate screening of couples at risk for severe intimate partner violence.
36 The aim for the general psychiatrist is to exclude severe intimate partner violence or partner abusive with impactful assaults from couples therapy (
Table 2).
| Table 2 | Factors that preclude couples therapy | - Uncontrolled, continuous use of alcohol(Drug information on alcohol) or substances
- Fear of serious injury from partner
- Severe violence that has resulted in medical attention
- Conviction for a violent crime or violation of a restraining order
- Use of a weapon against the partner
- Threat to kill the partner
- Stalking or other partner-focused obsessional behavior
- Bizarre forms of violence, eg, sadistic violence
| |
To exclude intimate partner violence, the following factors must be assessed: uncontrolled continuous use of alcohol or substances, fear of serious injury from the partner, severe violence that has resulted in the victim requiring medical attention, conviction for a violent crime or violation of a restraining order, previous use of a weapon against the partner, previous threat to kill the partner, stalking or other partner-focused obsessional behavior, and any bizarre forms of violence, such as sadistic violence. If any of these factors are present, couples treatment is not recommended. If severe intimate partner violence is present, safety planning should be discussed with the individual at risk. This should include education about how to maintain the safety of the patient and of his or her dependents and specifically how to access services in the community.
For couples with partner abusive with non-impactful assaults who wish to enter couples therapy, it is nevertheless important to ensure safety. The key components to safe conjoint treatment include the signing of a “no violence” contract, the use of a negotiated time-out tool, and strategies to manage anger. Treatment of comorbidity is important, and in addition to alcohol screening, patients and their partners should be assessed for depressive disorders and PTSD.
Significant reduction in intimate partner violence can occur when comorbid alcoholism is successfully treated.
37 Couples can enter couples treatment when the alcohol abuse/dependence is under control.
38 Greater treatment involvement is associated with greater reduction in violence. Couples treatment consists of a sobriety contract, behavioral assignments, and relapse prevention.
39 The behavioral assignments are aimed at increasing positive feelings, shared activities, and constructive criticism. At the end of treatment, each couple completes a continued recovery plan that is reviewed quarterly for 2 years. The reduction in intimate partner violence is mediated by reduced problem drinking and enhanced relationship functioning.
Summary Intimate partner violence has been found to exist in 2 separate forms, severe with significant risk to the victim and mild or reciprocal with low risk of injury. It is unknown whether these 2 types of intimate partner violence are clinically distinct or whether they represent the extremes of a spectrum. Further research is needed to clarify whether these are distinct or whether one type can evolve into the other.
Physicians should make the effort to discuss intimate partner violence with their patients, both male and female, and to distinguish the 2 types of violence. For couples with partner abusive with non-impactful assaults or reciprocal violence, couples therapy may be indicated. To treat a couple engaged in intimate partner violence with couples therapy, guidelines to exclude those who are experiencing severe violence should be followed, and the couple should be screened for comorbid substance abuse/dependence, depressive disorders, and PTSD. The patient and partner should be fully assessed and informed about the treatment options available. In the field of intimate partner violence assessment and treatment, continued research is needed to provide psychiatrists with clear directions for diagnosis and treatment.
References
1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N.
Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1998.
2. Heyman RE, Slep AM.
Relational diagnoses: from reliable, rationally derived criteria to testable taxonic hypotheses. In: Beach SRH, Wamboldt MZ, Kaslow NJ, et al, eds. Relational Processes and DSM-V, Neuroscience, Assessment, Prevention and Treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2006.
3. Johnson MP. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women.
J Marriage Fam. 1995;57:283-294.
4. Kessler RC, Molnar BE, Feurer ID, Appelbaum M. Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002;24:487-508.
5. Whitaker DJ, Haileyesus T, Swahn M, Saltzman LS. Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence.
Am J Public Health. 2007;97:941-947.
6. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review.
Psychol Bull. 2000;126:651-680.
7. Langhinrichsen-Rohling D, Vivian J. Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison.
Violence Vict. 1994;9:107-124.
8. O’Leary KD, Barling J, Arias I, et al. Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: a longitudinal analysis.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57:263-268.
9. Walker LE. Battered woman syndrome: empirical findings.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1087:142-157.
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for family and intimate partner violence: recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:382-386.
11. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. The role of the pediatrician in recognizing and intervening on behalf of abused women.
Pediatrics. 1998;101:1091-1092.
12. American College of Emergency Physicians. Domestic violence. Policy no. 400286.
http://www3.acep.org/practres.aspx?id=29184&_taxonomyid=0. Accessed November 5, 2007.
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG issues technical bulletin on domestic violence.
Am Fam Physician. 1995;52:2387-2388, 2391.
14. American Academy of Family Physicians. Violence position paper: AAFP policy and advocacy statement.
http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/v/violencepositionpaper.html. Accessed November 5, 2007.
15. American Psychiatric Association. Domestic violence. Policy no. 200111.
http://www.psych.org/edu/other_res/lib_archives/archives/200111.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2007.
16. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugareman DB. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data.
J Fam Issues. 1996;17:283-316.
17. Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality.
Violence Vict. 2004;19:507-520.
18. Glass N, Dearwater S, Campbell J. Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments.
J Emerg Nurs. 2001;27:141-149.
19. Bonomi AE, Allen DG, Holt VL. Conversational silence, coercion, equality: the role of language in influencing who gets identified as abused.
Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2258-2266.
20. McFarlane JM, Groff JY, O’Brien JA, Watson K. Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial.
Nursing Res. 2006;55:52-61.
21. McFarlane J, Malecha A, Gist J, et al. Increasing the safety-promoting behaviors of abused women.
Am J Nurs. 2004;104:40-50.
22. Constantino R, Kim Y, Crane P. Effects of a social support intervention on health outcomes in residents of a domestic violence shelter: a pilot study.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005;26:575-590.
23. Tiwari A, Leung WC, Leung TW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of empowerment training for Chinese abused pregnant women in Hong Kong.
BJOG. 2005;112:1249-1256.
24. Sullivan CM, Bybee DI. Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:43-53.
25. Bybee D, Sullivan CM. Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program.
Am J Community Psychol. 2005;36:85-96.
26. Pence E, Paymar M.
Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer; 1993.
27. Babcock JC, Green CE, Robie C. Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;23:1023-1053.
28. Brannen SJ, Rubin A. Comparing the effectiveness of gender-specific and couples groups in a court-mandated spouse abuse treatment program.
Res Soc Work Pract. 1996;6:405-424.
29. Stith S, Rosen K, McCollum E, Thomsen C. Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2004;30:305-318.
30. Stith S, McCollum E, Rosen K, Locke L. Multi-couples group treatment for domestic violence. In: Kaslow FW, ed.
Comprehensive Handbook of Psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley; 2004:499-520.
31. Finn MA, Bettis P. Punitive action or gentle persuasion: exploring police officers’ justifications for using dual arrest in domestic violence cases.
Violence Against Women. 2006;12:268-287.
32. O’Leary KD, Heyman RE, Neidig PH. Treatment of wife abuse: a comparison of gender-specific and conjoint approaches.
Behav Ther. 1999;30:475-505.
33. Goldner V. When love hurts, treating abusive relationships.
Psychoanal Inquiry. 2004;2493:346-372.
34. Jory B, Anderson D. Intimate justice. III: healing the anguish of abuse and embracing the anguish of accountability.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2000;26:329-340.
35. Lee MY, Uken A, Sebold J. Accountability for change: solution-focused treatment with domestic violence offenders.
Fam Soc. 2004;85:463-476.
36. Bogard M, Mederos F. Battering and couples therapy: universal screening and selection of treatment modality.
J Marital Fam Ther. 1999;25:291-312.
37. Stuart GL, Moore TM, Gordon KC, et al. Psychopathology in women arrested for domestic violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2006;21:376-389.
38. O’Farrell TJ, Murphy CM, Stephan SH, et al. Partner violence before and after couples-based alcoholism treatment for male alcoholic patients: the role of treatment involvement and abstinence.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:202-217.
39. O’Farrell TJ, Fals-Stewart W. Alcohol abuse.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2003;29:121-146.
Evidence-Based References
Babcock JC, Green CE, Robie C. Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;23:1023-1053.
Stith S, Rosen K, McCollum E, Thomsen C. Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2004;30:305-318.
