PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home »

Psychiatric Times. Vol. 25 No. 11
Pages: 1  2  
Next
CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 

Bone Mass Density Loss and Antidepressants: Another Tough Break for SSRI Users?

By James M. Ellison, MD, MPH

| October 1, 2008
Dr Ellison is associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and clinical director of the geriatric psychiatry program at McLean Hospital, Belmont, Mass.

James M. Ellison, MD, MPHWhen I was recently asked by a patient about the link between osteoporosis and SSRIs, I dimly recalled this topic’s emergence in a medical journal in 2007, its subsequent meander through several newsletters, and its gradual return to the bottom of my mental risk-assessment checklist.

I asked several colleagues whether they had added bone mass density (BMD) loss to the pantheon of practice-altering medication risks we have learned to consider when prescribing antidepressants, or even to the list of disturbing and more or less common experiences (eg, sexual dysfunction, sweating, nightmares, myoclonus, apathy, discontinuation syndrome, hyponatremia, bradycardia/hypotension) that taint SSRI benefits for some patients. My informal inquiry and review of the literature suggested that a column on this topic would be timely.

Osteoporosis—the development of bone porosity—results from the deterioration of bone tissue that predisposes to low-trauma fractures, especially of the hip, spine, or wrists. Early BMD loss and osteoporosis are asymptomatic and often develop over a number of years, reflecting the convergence of multiple disruptive influences on the process of bone remodeling.1 Without directed attempts to diagnose osteoporosis in asymptomatic persons at risk for BMD loss, clinical recognition may be delayed until the occurrence of backache, height loss, or a fracture associated with minimal physical trauma (such as a fall from standing height).2 Such “fragility fractures” added an estimated 5.8 million disability-adjusted life-years to the global health burden in 2000.2

Background on riskTable 1

Osteoporosis is present in 15% of whites in their 50s and in 70% of those older than 80 years.3 Although 80% of persons with osteoporosis are women, men affected by hypogonadism or a host of other disorders are vulnerable as well. Osteoporosis occurs at the highest rates among non-Hispanic white and Asian women aged 50 or older, but no ethnic group is unaffected.4

In certain at-risk subpopulations, bone loss is accelerated. Various sources, including the informative Web site of the National Osteoporosis Foundation (www.nof.org) provide lists of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors (Table 1). Among the prescribed medications that compound modifiable risk (Table 2), the glucocorticoids and antiepileptic drugs are most widely known. However, 2 additional medication classes that figure prominently in psychiatric practice have also been reported to increase the risk of osteoporosis: the prolactin-increasing antipsychotics5 and the SSRIs.6-9 The SSRIs, about which recent data are available, will be the focus here.

SSRI effects on BMDTable 2

A need for examination of the effects of SSRIs on bone integrity was suggested as early as 1998 in a case-control study that linked use of SSRIs or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with increased risk for hip fractures in elderly persons.9 Concern flared again last year with the publication of several important studies. Haney and colleagues6 reported the results of a cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective observational study of 5995 men, 65 years and older, of whom 160 were SSRI users. Compared with men who were taking no antidepressant, the SSRI users (but not users of trazodone or TCAs) had significantly lower BMD in the hip and lumbar spine. The magnitude of the association appeared to be similar to that linked with glucocorticoid use in this cohort, although the meaning of this finding was unclear because detailed data about the amount and route of glucocorticoid use were too limited. After considering the roles of several potential confounding factors, these authors concluded that the association between low BMD and SSRI use was not explained by the presence of depressed mood, as measured by the score from the 12-item Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Study, Mental Component Scale.

A prospective study compared serial measurements of BMD in a cohort of 2722 women 65 years and older who were taking an SSRI or a TCA.7 The mean interval between the BMD measurement visits was 4.9 years. Depression was measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the use of concurrent medications and calcium supplements was recorded. The SSRI users, but again not TCA users, showed a higher rate of bone loss in total hip measurements compared with nonusers. Because the SSRI-user cohort included more patients with a GDS score of at least 6 than the TCA-user cohort, the results were re-analyzed; patients whose GDS score was at least 6 during one of the BMD visits were excluded. This exclusion decreased the magnitude but did not eliminate the significance of the greater decrease in BMD observed in SSRI users.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • An Update on ADHD
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Ethical and Legal Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Eco-Psychiatry: Why We Need to Keep the Environment in Mind
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULT

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Display
Evidence on Display
Guidelines on Display
Patient Education on Display
Clinical Trials on Display
Practical Articles on Display
Research and Reviews on Display
All "Display" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy