PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home »

Psychiatric Times. Vol. 25 No. 13
Pages: 1  2  
Previous
FUTURE OF PSYCHIATRY 

Changes in Psychiatric Diagnosis

By Michael B. First, MD | November 1, 2008

Dr First is professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University and research psychiatrist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute. He was the editor of DSM-IV-TR and was director of the DSM-V Prelude Web site. He is not a member of the DSM-V Task Force or Work-groups. He was a paid consultant to the Amer-ican Psychiatric Association on DSM from 1990 through 2007 and receives royalties from books related to DSM-IV (eg, DSM-IV Guidebook). Dr First consults for pharmaceutical companies to provide diagnostic training for clinical trials. In the past 12 months, he has consulted for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Cepha-lon, Wyeth, Roche, Novartis, and MedAvante.


One of the DSM-V research planning conferences, co-chaired by Drs Eric Hollander and Joseph Zohar, examined which disorders in DSM might be considered for inclusion in an obsessive-compulsive spectrum grouping, based on phenomenology, comorbidity, course of illness, treatment response, genetics, neuroimaging, and other validators.10 They proposed the following candidates for inclusion in the OC spectrum:

• Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)
• Hoarding
• Tic disorders
• Sydenham and other pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections (PANDAS)
• Trichotillomania
• Body dysmorphic disorder
• Hypochondriasis
• Autism
• Eating disorders
• Pathological gambling and other behavior addictions
• Substance dependence

Conference participants concluded that the strongest evidence for inclusion in an OC spectrum exists for tics, body dysmorphic disorder, and hypochrondriasis, with less support for hoarding, trichotillomania, PANDAS, and OCPD.

Other areas of change

Another area of likely change in DSM-V concerns current dissatisfaction with its categorical nature: that is, in DSM-IV a person either has or does not have a particular diagnosis. Categorical systems or typologies are the predominant approach used in medical classifications for several reasons. Classifying the world into categories is a fundamental characteristic of human thinking embodied in the nouns of everyday speech (eg, animals, plants, planets, chemical elements).

The yes/no nature of categorical diagnosis also serves to facilitate clinical decision making, which is typically characterized by a number of yes/no decisions (eg, whether to treat, whether to hospitalize). Moreover, it has traditionally been assumed that most medical diseases are discrete entities. However, while this assumption might be true for a few conditions (eg, Down syndrome, fragile X syndrome, Alzheimer disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), the vast majority of psychiatric disorders exist on a continuum with no discrete boundaries between disorders (eg, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) and between disorders and normality (eg, depression).

The imposition of arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, as in DSM, leads to high rates of subthreshold and not otherwise specified diagnoses, and high rates of diagnostic comorbidity. For this reason, there has been great interest in incorporating dimensional approaches into DSM-V.11 Such approaches could improve measurement-based care and allow clinicians to provide a dimensional indication of cross-cutting symptoms, such as impulsivity or lack of insight. The challenge for DSM-V will be to figure out how to include dimensions that clinicians will find useful rather than burdensome.12-14

Conclusion

When DSM-V is published in 2012, it will probably be the last of these diagnostic manuals as we know them. The current model for revising DSM is to convene workgroups at certain intervals that will review the scientific literature and propose changes to the definitions of every disorder in the manual based on new findings. The obvious problem with this model is that scientific advances are made all the time—and not at the same rate for each class of disorders.

If a new finding concerning the pathophysiology of schizophrenia renders the definition obsolete, why should a new definition have to wait until the American Psychiatric Association (APA) revises the entire manual? Similarly, for disorders in which there has been little scientific research, the convening of workgroups devoted to proposing changes to the criteria would increase the likelihood that changes will be made unnecessarily.

Although this problem has long been recognized, technical constraints on how changes could be disseminated have kept the APA locked into a traditional model in which (like textbooks) the entire manual is periodically revised. Advances in electronic publishing are on the verge of freeing the APA from this model and may allow changes to be made piecemeal to DSM in response to scientific advances. It is therefore likely that future editions of DSM will be distributed as an electronic document that can be updated as needed.

Pages: 1  2  
Previous
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





References
1. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Skodol A. DSM-III: the major achievements and an overview. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:151-164.
2. McHugh PR. Striving for coherence: psychiatry’s efforts over classification. JAMA. 2005;293:2526-2528.
3. Frances A, First MB, Pincus H. DSM-IV Guidebook. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1995.
4. Sunderland T, Jeste D, Baiyewu O, et al, eds. Diagnostic Issues in Dementia: Advancing the Research Agenda for DSM-V. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
5. Sunderland T, Hampel H, Takeda M, et al. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: are we ready? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2006;19:172-179.
6. Charney D, Barlow D, Botteron K, et al. Neuroscience research agenda to guide development of a pathophysiologically based classification system. In: Kupfer D, First MB, Regier DA, eds. A Research Agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2002:31-84.
7. Kendler KS. Reflections on the relationship between psychiatric genetics and psychiatric nosology. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1138-1146.
8. Hyman SE. Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:725-732.
9. Phillips KA, Price L, Greenberg B, Rasmussen S. Should the DSM diagnostic groupings be changed? In: Phillips KA, First MB, Pincus HA, eds. Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2003:57-84.
10. Hollander E, Kim S, Zohar J. OCSDs in the forthcoming DSM-V. CNS Spect. 2007;12:320-323.
11. Helzer JE, Kraemer HC, Krueger RF. The feasibility and need for dimensional psychiatric diagnoses. Psychol Med. 2006;36:1671-1680.
12. Sussman N. The developmental process for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Prim Psychiatry. 2007;14:44-47.
13. First MB, Westen D. Classification for clinical practice: how to make ICD and DSM better able to serve clinicians. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19:473-481.
14. First MB. Clinical utility: a prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114:560-564.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • An Update on ADHD
  • Eco-Psychiatry: Why We Need to Keep the Environment in Mind
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Cultural Psychiatry and the 'No-Chicken' Doctor
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULT

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Display
Evidence on Display
Guidelines on Display
Patient Education on Display
Clinical Trials on Display
Practical Articles on Display
Research and Reviews on Display
All "Display" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy