PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home »

Psychiatric Times. Vol. 26 No. 10
Pages: 1  2  
Next
CLINICAL 

Antidepressant Use in Children With Cancer

What We Now Know (and Need to Know) About the Use of Antidepressants

By Maryland Pao, MD, Elizabeth D. Ballard, and Julie M. Zito, PhD | October 10, 2009
Dr Pao is deputy clinical director at the NIMH, NIH in Bethesda, Md; Ms Ballard is a predoctoral fellow at the NIMH, NIH; Dr Zito is professor in the departments of pharmaceutical health services—research and psychiatry at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. The authors report no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.

In 2007, cancer was diagnosed in 10,400 children and adolescents under the age of 15 years.1 While cancer remains the second leading cause of death in children, increasing numbers of children with cancer are surviving into adulthood.2 Over the past 30 years, 5-year survival rates for children with cancer have significantly improved, from 59% in 1975 to 1977 to 80% in 1996 to 2004.3 Pediatric cancer, increasingly considered a chronic rather than an acute condition, is an intense emotional and physical experience for patients and their families.4

Comprehensive psychiatric assessment of these children is complicated by symptoms of medical comorbidities that overlap mental health conditions. Few resources exist to guide clinicians in the psychiatric treatment of children with cancer. This article describes the sparse research from small clinical studies on the extent of psychiatric treatment in children with cancer and evidence from outcome studies of medication use in these children. Minimal knowledge on the role of antidepressants in such children motivated us to examine the question in a broad population-based approach.

Psychopathology

One area of interest in caring for children with cancer is the prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses. Assessment of psychiatric disorders in these children from either research or community settings is difficult because of the complex medical and emotional presentation of illness.5,6 DSM-IV criteria for mood disorders, for example, include both somatic and cognitive symptom criteria, and clinicians must decide which symptoms are caused by the illness and treatment and which are related to a separate psychiatric diagnosis.7

In addition, doctors and nurses may overestimate psychosocial distress and symptoms in children and adolescents with cancer.6 Assessment tools for psychiatric disorders are not often validated in children with medical illnesses, which may lead in part to the varying research prevalence of psychiatric disorders in this population.8

Reports of psychiatric illness in children with cancer range from a high of 17% to rates that do not differ significantly from those for the general population.9 Specific cancers and their treatments may also contribute to the variable rates of depression. Without more precise estimates that generalize to large youth populations, it is unclear whether children with cancer are at higher risk for a psychiatric disorder than children who are not medically ill.

Mood comorbidities

Regardless of whether a patient fulfills all criteria for a psychiatric disorder, mood symptoms are commonly reported by children with cancer.5,10 In a clinical study of adolescents who had recently received a diagnosis of cancer, 12% had clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and 21% had clinically significant symptoms of depression.10

Adolescent cancer survivors have been shown to be at higher risk than sibling controls for depression, anxiety, and attention deficit symptoms as well as antisocial behaviors. Survivors of childhood cancer may be at increased risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts later in life.11,12 Posttraumatic stress symptoms are another concern in children with cancer: diagnosis and medical treatments can become a traumatic stressor for these patients.13 As a result, clinicians who treat children with cancer may focus on treating particular symptoms, such as mood, anxiety, or fatigue, rather than on a specific diagnosis.

Psychological interventions

Options for symptomatic treatment are limited, and their efficacy has not been established in children with cancer. Psychological interventions have shown promise in decreasing distress, but they have not shown an effect on clinical outcomes.14 Psychopharmacological efficacy studies have been limited to an open-label trial of fluvoxamine(Drug information on fluvoxamine) in 15 children and adolescents with cancer, which showed good tolerability and improvement in psychiatric symptoms. There was also an open trial of citalopram(Drug information on citalopram) in 4 children with cancer, which also showed good tolerability and a decrease in depressive symptoms.15,16

Fluoxetine has been shown to be effective in treating depression in randomized controlled trials of children and adolescents who are not medically ill. This agent is the only SSRI currently approved for treatment of depression in youth.17 Nevertheless, SSRIs and other antidepressants are often used off-label at the discretion of the clinician; this suggests the need to estimate the frequency with which these agents are used to address specific conditions in children with cancer where the need may be both acute and ongoing.

Many children with cancer are being treated for mood or physical symptoms with psychotropic medications. A survey of pediatric oncologists found that half had prescribed an SSRI for a patient, often without consultation from a mental health clinician.18

In addition, a review of hospitalized children reported that 10% of children with cancer had received an antidepressant medication within a year of the cancer diagnosis.19 In another study, a psychotropic medication had been prescribed for 14% of children with cancer when they were admitted to an NIH clinical center.20 These sparse study findings are not sufficient to understand the extent of antidepressant use in community-based practice and suggest the need for a large population-based study.

A pharmacoepidemiological study

A large pediatric cross-sectional pharmacoepidemiological study was undertaken with administrative claims data for 2000 and 2001 from 2.7 million patients aged 2 through 17 years who had had 3 or more months of Medicaid coverage. There were 1040 patients with at least 2 International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis claims for cancer treatment. A randomly selected age-, gender-, and race/ethnicity-matched group of 10 controls for each case was developed (n = 10,400).

After controlling for gender, age, race/ethnicity, and psychiatric comorbidities, the likelihood of antidepressant use was nearly twice as common in youths with cancer as in the control group (1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.44). Specifically, antidepressants were prescribed for 8.8% of youths with cancer compared with 5.2% of matched controls.21

Irrespective of the cancer diagnosis, antidepressant use was 5.4 times more likely in youths who had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Likewise, African American and Hispanic youth were 60% less likely to have received an antidepressant, irrespective of the cancer diagnosis. These demographic and comorbidity treatment findings reemphasize the well-established role of race/ethnicity in explaining disparities in health services and demonstrate possible indications for off-label use of antidepressants in pedi-atric ADHD.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • An Update on ADHD
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Ethical and Legal Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Eco-Psychiatry: Why We Need to Keep the Environment in Mind
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULT

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Display
Evidence on Display
Guidelines on Display
Patient Education on Display
Clinical Trials on Display
Practical Articles on Display
Research and Reviews on Display
All "Display" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy