PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home »

Psychiatric Times. Vol. 27 No. 1
Pages: 1  2  3  
Previous
NEWS 

The Past, Present, and Future of Medical Marijuana in the United States

By John Thomas, JD, LLM, MPH | January 6, 2010
New Haven, Connecticut
Professor Thomas is a former litigator who teaches law and medicine, advanced law and medicine, civil procedure, and commercial law at the Quinnipiac University College of Law. His publication topics range from health policy to mental health treatment to acoustic music. He is an accomplished fingerstyle guitarist who has performed at regional festivals, on live radio, and in clubs, coffee houses, and bookstores in the New Haven, Conn, area.

The October 19, 2009, memorandum

The Justice Department’s memorandum begins by stating that the department is “committed to the enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act in all States” and that it is cognizant that “Congress has determined that marijuana is a dangerous drug.” But, because the department “is also committed to making efficient and rational use of its limited investigative and prosecutorial resources,” the department should neither investigate nor prosecute “individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with” state law.

How, one might wonder, will federal authorities know without investigating whether an individual’s conduct complies with state law? “Typically, when any of the following characteristics is present, the conduct will not be in clear and unambiguous compliance with applicable state law”: “unlawful possession or unlawful use of firearms,” “violence,” “sales to minors,” or “ties to other criminal enterprises.”

On the other hand, neither “compliance with state law [n]or the absence of one or all of the above factors create[s] a legal defense to a violation of the Controlled Substances Act.” The memo is but a recommendation to federal agents, and medical use remains illegal.

The current and future status of the medical use of marijuana

Imagine the cancer survivor who resides in one of the 13 states that recognizes medical use of marijuana. She can ingest the herb knowing that federal agents are unlikely to kick her door down and arrest her. She will also know that her conduct is patently illegal. Every day, to address the nausea that accompanies her chemotherapy, she will engage in illegal conduct that the attorney general has authorized.

This is the nature of the compromise that the October 19 memorandum represents. The nation’s top law enforcement official has embraced the “compassionate use” that the California electorate recognized more than a dozen years ago. Current law may be the best that the cancer patient can hope for, but the remainder of the populace should not be satisfied. Those who support medical use of marijuana should not be happy with its continuing illegality. Those opposed to it should not accept federally licensed illegal behavior. Now, perhaps more than ever, in the words of Richard Nixon, we need “a goddamn strong statement on marijuana.”

Pages: 1  2  3  
Previous
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by orison squirrel | February 08, 2011 5:47 AM EST

"We have spent over a trillion dollars trying to eradicate the world's most beneficial plant off the face of the earth. Imagine what a better world this would be if that money had been spent on treatment, education and studying the medical benefits of marijuana."
-- Steve Hager - High Times Editor (1988 - 2003)




"But at this point, I'd be in favor of legalization. I wouldn't encourage anybody to smoke any substances. But I don't think it should be stigmatized as an illegal substance. Tobacco smoking causes far more harm. And in terms of an intoxicant, alcohol causes far more harm."
~ Donald Tashkin,
National Institute on Drug Abuse


I left Western Pa in the mid 70's and it was always good pot, and with the Steelers stitching up the generation gap a tad, and Leary overturning the Marijuana Tax Act. It was mostly overlooked as a problem and cops would usually confiscate it and thats it. They had dry counties for booze, but medicinally they could treat it as they do drug stores. State stores sell the hard booze, or did then. Its all based on Nixon's lies and the lies are getting ridulous and repeatative. It's the Commonwealth with the Whiskey Rebellion. I think its ripe for a reality check. Though fossil fools, drugs, booze, prisons, cops and rehabs will always hide behind kids, perpetuating this farce for profits.



Commonwealth
Thus commonwealth originally meant a state or nation-state governed for the common good as opposed to an authoritarian state governed for the benefit of a given class of owners.

by Mary Lynn Mathre | January 25, 2010 10:01 AM EST

As noted in the article above - cannabis never belonged in Schedule I, yet it remains in this forbidden category. NIDA has sponsored countless studies to support the "reefer madness" about the dangers of cannabis, but by 1998 cannabis researchers began to learn about the endocannabinoid system. This discovery is helping us understand why it is so safe and why it has such a wide variety of indications for use. With the prohibition, illicit users/dealers search for ways to make it more potent (as in mooonshine during the prohibition)and now studies indicate that it may be the high THC content and very low CBD content found in the skunk variety that lead to psychotic reactions. Cannabidiol or CBD is not psychoactive and helps modulate the THC found in natural cannabis. This may explain why many patients dislike dronabinol (synthetic THC in sesame oil) - THC is responsible for the high and too much may not be a good thing. Learn more about the science and visit www.medicalcannabis.com - patients need this herbal medicine now.

by Art Zwerling | January 24, 2010 12:36 PM EST

I believe there are scientific inquiry issues that need to be a resolved before we decriminalize marijuana. Certainly maintaining cannabis preperations in DEA Scedule 1 is sheer insanity. As a starting place we may want to consider placing established therapeutic cannabinoids like dronabinol, nabilone and Sativex (when and if released in the US) in a less restrictive category. Given the incredibly complex pharmacognosy and pharmacology of crude cannabis preperations, I'm not sure that making medical marijuana freely available is well advised until we have more well controlled prospective studies clearly demonstrating it's therapeutic advantages over available cannabinoid preperations that utilize a less deleterious route of administration with a standardized preparation of predictable potency. Certainly we can do better than to leave folks that have a documented medical need for cannabinoids out in the grey zone of illegal but not prosecuted! Art Zwerling





Image © iStockphoto.com

References

1. Ogden DW. Memorandum for Selected United States Attorneys. Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana; October 2009. http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/medical-marijuana.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2009.
2. Zimmerman B, Crumpacker N, Bayer R. Is Marijuana the Right Medicine for You? A Factual Guide to Medical Uses of Marijuana. New Canaan, CT: Keats Publishing Inc; 1998.
3. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB. Marihuana as medicine: a plea for reconsideration. JAMA. 1995;273:1875-1876.
4. Extractum Cannabis. The US Pharmacopoeia. 3rd ed. 1851.
5. Wood GB, Bache F, eds. The Dispensatory of the United States of America 354. 9th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co; 1851.
6. Extractum Cannabis Purificatum. The US Pharmacopoeia. 4th ed. 1864.
7. Dept of Health, Education and Welfare. Marijuana and Health, a Report to the Congress From the Secretary, Dept of Health, Education and Welfare. No. 85; March 1971.
8. McCarberg BH, Barkin RL. The future of cannabinoids as analgesic agents: a pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic overview. Am J Ther. 2007;14:475-483.
9. Dekker N, Linszen DH, De Haan L. Reasons for cannabis use and effects of cannabis use as reported by patients with psychotic disorders. Psychopathology. 2009;42:350-360.
10. Pub L No. 75-238, 50 Stat 551.
11. Bonnie RJ, Whitebread CH. The Marihuana Conviction: A History of Marihuana Prohibition in the United States. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press; 1974:154-174.
12. 21 USC §§801-904.
13. Report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse: Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding. Commissioned by President Richard M. Nixon, March, 1972 http://www.iowamedicalmarijuana.org/documents/nc1contents.aspx. Accessed December 10, 2009.
14. Conversation 498-5: meeting with Nixon, Haldeman, and Ehrlichman; Oval Office, May 13, 1971, 10:30 am through 12:30 pm [transcript]. http://www.csdp.org/research/nixonpot.txt. Accessed December 10, 2009.
15. Cal Health & Safety Code §§11362.5 et seq.
16. Medical Marijuana: 13 Legal Medical Marijuana States—Laws, Fees, and Possession Limits. 2009. http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000881. Accessed December 10, 2009.
17. Gonzales v Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005).


 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Journey of the Traumatized Hero: Kerouac’s On the Road and Gandhi’s Railroad Ride
  • DSM-5: Where Do We Go From Here?
  • Suicidal Behavior: A Separate Diagnosis
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Cultural Psychiatry and the 'No-Chicken' Doctor
  • Benefits of CAM Therapies for Dementia
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • DSM-5 Won’t Solve the Overdiagnosis Problem—But Clinicians Can
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULT

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Display
Evidence on Display
Guidelines on Display
Patient Education on Display
Clinical Trials on Display
Practical Articles on Display
Research and Reviews on Display
All "Display" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy