PsychiatricTimes Members: Login | Register

|     

PsychiatricTimes SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
Risk Assessment
News
Current Issues
Blogs
Special Reports
CME
Conferences
Resources
Careers
Multimedia
About Us
 

Home »

Psychiatric Times. Vol. 23 No. 11
Pages: 1  2  3  
Previous
 

Augmentation Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Depression

By Russell Joffe, MD | October 30, 2006

Buspirone

Augmentation with buspirone(Drug information on buspirone) produced encouraging results in open studies of serotonergic antidepressants, but 2 placebo-controlled trials failed to separate buspirone from placebo.35,36 In these 2 studies, buspirone was efficacious in more than half of the subjects, but placebo was comparably efficacious. The findings are difficult to interpret: subjects who were treatment-resistant would not be expected to have high placebo response rates in an augmentation study.35,36 The recent observation that buspirone and bupropion produced comparable clinical benefits following citalopram(Drug information on citalopram) failure6 should rekindle interest in buspirone as an augmentation strategy given its favorable side-effect profile (although bupropion performed better on some secondary outcome measures and was better tolerated).

Pindolol

Pindolol, a serotonin 5HT1A receptor antagonist, initially generated much optimism regarding its use as an augmentation agent, but in controlled trials, it produced disappointing results. A recent meta-analysis concluded that pindolol(Drug information on pindolol) is not a clinically effective augmentation strategy, although this may be explained by the inadequate doses employed in the included studies; at higher doses, the clinical utility of pindolol remains uncertain.37 A small placebo-controlled trial found that a single daily dose of 7.5 mg of pindolol was effective for paroxetine(Drug information on paroxetine)-resistant depression.38

Atypical antipsychotics

In the VA study mentioned above, the atypical antipsychotics were the second most common augmentation strategy used.7 Compounds that have been shown to augment antidepressant response in open-label studies include risperidone(Drug information on risperidone), aripiprazole(Drug information on aripiprazole), olanzapine, and ziprasidone(Drug information on ziprasidone).39-41 However, the limited number of controlled trials of antipsychotic antidepressant augmentation have produced inconclusive, largely negative data on their clinical efficacy.42 Since the use of this class of drug for this indication may be broadening, adequately designed and powered studies are required to evaluate their effectiveness for treatment-refractory depression.

Other augmentation strategies

Other common augmentation strategies include psychostimulants, for which there is very limited empiric support, and anticonvulsants. The latter are commonly used in bipolar disorder, but their role in unipolar treatment-resistant depression has been studied less and is, therefore, less understood. In particular, lamotrigine(Drug information on lamotrigine) would be of interest as an antidepressant augmentation agent, given its antidepressant efficacy in bipolar illness. However, to date, the results of studies on the antidepressant augmenting effect of lamotrigine are mixed; there has been 1 small study with positive results43 and 2 studies with negative results.44,45

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Of the various augmentation strategies, lithium(Drug information on lithium) and T3 show considerable promise as effective augmentation agents; the effectiveness of busprirone requires further consideration given the results of the STAR*D trial. These compounds, however, seem to have limited use and one could reasonably conclude that they have fallen out of favor with clinicians as useful treatments for depression.7

The problems with lithium are obvious: its high side-effect burden, the need for continual monitoring, and the potential long-term effects on organs, such as the thyroid and kidney. In light of its well-established efficacy, however, and the limited successes of other antidepressant options,4-6 it still may be underused.7

The perception of T3 is that it is not as effective as lithium or that it will not work with SSRIs. Although the literature is limited, there is some evidence of the comparable efficacy of T3 and lithium, and 3 studies confirm the efficacy of T3 when it is added to an SSRI.31-33

Notwithstanding the need for proof of the clinical efficacy of T3 and bu-spirone, on the basis of the evidence to date, these compounds appear safe and effective, with limited need for patient monitoring, and they have no documented long-term adverse effects. Although most augmentation studies have been of short duration, it is possible that an augmentation agent, once effective, should be maintained for the period of antidepressant therapy and even during maintenance treatment which may extend over months or years. T3 and buspirone would be ideal for such long-term use, although there would be greater concern about long-term lithium treatment. The second-generation antipsychotics appear to be increasingly popular as augmentation agents; however, the risk of the metabolic syndrome, the adverse cardiac sequelae, and the need for regular monitoring should raise concern over their potential for long-term use.

Augmentation strategies represent a viable alternative for patients with major depressive illness who do not respond to initial antidepressant therapy. The early augmentation agents have been largely overlooked despite their often better-established efficacy and, as is certainly the case with T3, a favorable side-effect profile. These compounds need a careful reappraisal as viable treatment options because refractory depression is a disorder with a high nonresponse rate and a high risk of recurrence and chronicity.

Lithium also needs a favorable reappraisal given its well-documented efficacy and because commonly used second-generation antipsychotics appear to have little, if any, advantage over lithium in terms of monitoring and short- and long-term adverse sequelae. Ultimately, given the limited efficacy of the various options for sequential treatment,4-6 no viable treatment can be ignored. It may not be so much a factor of whether one agent is better than another, but rather that all should be considered and used appropriately to effect the best treatment result.

Dr Joffe is a professor in the department of psychiatry at the New Jersey Medical School in Newark. He reports no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.
Pages: 1  2  3  
Previous
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





Drugs Mentioned in this article
Aripiprazole (Abilify)
Bupropion (Wellbutrin)
Buspirone (BuSpar)
Citalopram (Celexa)
Lamotrigine (Lamictal)
Lithium (Eskalith)
Olanzapine (Zyprexa)
Pindolol (Visken)
Risperidone (Risperdal)
Thyroxine
Triiodothyronine (Liothyronine, Cytomel)
Ziprasidone (Geodon)

REFERENCES:
1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA. 2003;289:3095-3105.
2. Keller MB, Klerman GL, Lavori PW, et al. Long term outcome of episodes of major depression: clinical and public health significance. JAMA. 1984;252:788-792.
3. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Mueller TI, et al. Time to recovery, chronicity and levels of psychopathology in major depression: a 5 year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:809-816.
4. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:28-40.
5. Fava M, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163: 1161-1172.
6. Trivedi MH, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, et al. Medication augmentation after failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1243-1252.
7. Valenstein M, McCarthy JE, Austin KL, et al. What happened to lithium? Antidepressant augmentation in clinical settings. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163: 1219-1225.
8. Bauer M, Dopfmer S. Lithium augmentation in treatment-resistant depression: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999;19: 427-434.
9. Heninger GR, Charney DS, Sternberg DE. Lithium carbonate augmentation of antidepressant treatment: an effective prescription for treatment-refractory depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:1335-1342.
10. Kantor D, McNevin S, Leichner P, et al. The benefit of lithium carbonate adjunct in refractory depression: fact or fiction? Can J Psychiatry. 1986;33:416-418.
11. Zusky PM, Biederman J, Rosenbaum JF, et al. Adjunct low dose lithium carbonate in treatment-resistant depression: a placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988;8:120-124.
12. Schopf J, Baumann P, Lemarchand T, Roy M. Treatment of endogenous depressions resistant to tricyclic antidepressants or related drugs by lithium addition; results of a placebo-controlled double-blind study. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989;22:183-187.
13. Browne M, Lapierre YD, Hrdina PD, Horn E. Lithium as an adjunct in the treatment of major depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;5:108-110.
14. Joffe RT, Singer W, Levitt AJ, MacDonald C. A placebo-controlled comparison of lithium and triiodothyronine augmentation of tricyclic antidepressants in unipolar refractory depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50: 387-393.
15. Stein G, Bernadt M. Lithium augmentation therapy in tricyclic-resistant depression: a controlled trial using lithium in low and normal doses. Br J Psychiatry. 1993; 162:634-640.
16. Katona CL, Abou-Saleh MT, Harrison DA, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of lithium augmentation of fluoxetine and lofepramine. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;166: 80-86.
17. Baumann P, Nil R, Souche A, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of citalopram with and without lithium in the treatment of therapy-resistant depressive patients: a clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic investigation. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996; 16:307-314.
18. Fava M, Rosenbaum JF, McGrath PJ, et al. Lithium and tricyclic augmentation of fluoxetine treatment in resistant major depression: a double-blind controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1372-1374.
19. Nierenberg AA, Papakostas GI, Peterson T, et al. Lithium augmentation of nortriptyline for subjects resistant to multiple antidepressants. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;23:92-95.
20. Aronson R, Offman HJ, Joffe RT, Naylor CD. Triiodothyronine augmentation in the treatment of refractory depression: a meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999; 53:842-848.
21. Earle BV. Thyroid hormone and tricyclic antidepressants in resistant depressions. Am J Psychiatry. 1970; 126:1667-1669.
22. Banki CM. The use of triiodothyronine in the treatment of depression [in Hungarian]. Orv Hetil. 1975;116: 2543-2546.
23. Banki CM. Cerebrospinal fluid amine metabolites after combined amitriptyline: triiodothyronine treatment of depressed women. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1977; 11:311-315.
24. Ogura C, Okuma T, Uchida Y, et al. Combined thyroid (triiodothyronine)-tricyclic antidepressant treatment in depressed states. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1974;28: 179-186.
25. Tsutsui S, Yamazaki Y, Nanba T, Tsushima M. Combined therapy of T3, and antidepressants in depression. J Int Med Res. 1979;7:138-146.
26. Goodwin FK, Prange AJ Jr, Post RM, et al. Potentiation of antidepressant effects by L-triiodothyronine in tricyclic nonresponders. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:34-38.
27. Schwarcz G, Halaris A, Baxter L, et al. Normal thyroid function in desipramine nonresponders compared to responders by the addition of L-triiodothyronine. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141:1614-1616.
28. Gitlin MJ, Winer H, Fairbanks L, et al. Failure of T3 to potentiate tricyclic antidepressant response. J Affect Disord. 1987;13:267-272.
29. Thase ME, Kupfer DJ, Jarrett DB. Treatment of imipramine-resistant recurrent depression: I. An open clinical trial of adjunctive L-triiodothyronine. J Clin Psychiatry. 1989;50:385-388.
30. Joffe RT, Singer W. A comparison of triiodothyronine and thyroxine in the potentiation of tricyclic antidepressants. Psychiatry Res. 1990;32:241-252.
31. Agid O, Lerer B. Algorithm-based treatment of major depression in an outpatient clinic: clinical correlates of response to a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor and to triiodothyronine augmentation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;6:41-49.
32. Iosifescu DV, Nierenberg AA, Mischoulon D, et al. An open study of triiodothyronine augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1038-1042.
33. Abraham G, Milev R, Stuart Lawson J. T3 augmentation of SSRI resistant depression. J Affect Dis. 2006;91: 211-215.
34. Baumgartner A. Thyroxine and the treatment of affective disorders: an overview of the results of basic and clinical research. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2000;3: 149-165.
35. Landen M, Bjorling G, Agren H, Fahlen T. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of buspi- rone in combination with an SSRI in patients with treatment-refractory depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:664-668.
36. Appelberg BG, Syvalahti EK, Koskinen TE, et al. Patients with severe depression may benefit from buspirone augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: results from a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind placebo wash-in study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:448-452.
37. Segrave R, Nathan PJ. Pindolol augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: accounting for the variability of results of placebo-controlled double-blind studies in patients with major depression. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2005;20:163-174.
38. Sokolski KN, Conney JC, Brown BJ, DeMet EM. Once daily high-dose pindolol for SSRI-refractory depression. Psychiatry Res. 2004;125:81-86.
39. Nemeroff CB. Use of atypical antipsychotics in refractory depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66 (suppl 8):13-21.
40. Rapaport MH, Gharabaw GM, Canuso CM, et al. Effects of risperidone augmentation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: results of open-label treatment followed by double-blind continuation. Neuropsychopharmacologyl. 2006 Jun 7; [E pub ahead of print].
41. Simon JS, Nemeroff CB. Aripiprazole augmentation of antidepressants for the treatment of partially responding and nonresponding patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1216-1220.
42. Shelton RC, Williamson DJ, Corya SA, et al. Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination for treatment-resistant depression: a controlled study of SSRI and nortriptyline resistance. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1289-1297.
43. Gabriel A. Lamotrigine adjunctive treatment in resistant unipolar depression: An open, descriptive study. Depress Anxiety. 2006 Jul 14; [Epub ahead of print].
44. Normann, C, Hummel, B, Scharer, Lo, et al. Lamotrigine as adjunct to paroxetine in acute depression: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:337-344.
45. Barbosa, L, Berk, M, Vorster, M. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation with lamotrigine or placebo in patients concomitantly treated with fluoxetine for resistant major depressive episodes. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:403-407.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Addiction Medicine
Alzheimer Disease
Anxiety Disorders
ADHD
Bipolar Disorder
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Dementia
Depression
DSM-5
Geriatric Psychiatry

 

Health Care Reform
Major Depressive
Disorder
OCD
Personality Disorders
Schizoaffective Disorder
Schizophrenia
Sleep Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
All Topics

 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • The Moral Struggles of Practicing Psychiatrists
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Update on Mental Health Benefits and Substance Use Disorder Services Under the Affordable Care Act
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
  • Developmental Psychopathology Comes of Age
  • Synthetic Cathinones: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatment
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Experts Discuss Changes, Updates in DSM-5
  • The Paradox of Choice: When More Medications Mean Less Treatment
  • Will Your Clinical Records Support You in Court?
  • Refinements in ECT Techniques
  • Successful Aging: Strategies to Help Maintain and Nurture a Healthy Brain
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Grief and Depression: The Sages Knew the Difference
  • Is it Time for a Treatment Manual to Complement DSM-5?
  • Diagnosis and its Discontents: The DSM Debate Continues
  • Lamotrigine for Major Depressive Disorder Is Inappropriate
  • New Insight Into the Neurobiology of Depression
  • Tie One On for Patients
  • NIMH vs DSM 5: No One Wins, Patients Lose
  • Psychiatry and the Myth of “Medicalization”
  • Parity Laws: Powerful Weapon—or Pipe Dream?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
CAREER CENTER

  •   Featured Jobs  
  •    Resources   
  • Psychiatry and Nurse Practitioner Opportunities
  • Associate Medical Director - Psychiatrist Delray Beach, Florida
  • Retiring Child Psychiatrist Seeks Replacement August 2010 or Before
  • Chairperson, Dept of Psychiatry Needed
  • FT Staff Psychiatrist - Excellent Benefits
  • BC Adult and Child Psychiatrits - PT and FT Positions Available
  • Managing Risks When Practicing in Three-Party Care Settings
  • 12 Tips for Making Your Practice Greener
  • Keys to Avoiding Malpractice: Standard of Care in Psychiatric Practice
  • Take This Job and Shove It
  • Merging Administrative and Academic Careers in Psychiatry
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULT

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Display
Evidence on Display
Guidelines on Display
Patient Education on Display
Clinical Trials on Display
Practical Articles on Display
Research and Reviews on Display
All "Display" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy