Many suicidal patients come into therapy with sometimes conscious, but often unconscious, fantasies that cast the therapist in the role of their executioner. Netty seemed to be such a patient; she and Chabot also experienced a closeness in her death. A commitment on the therapist's part to become executioner if treatment fails plays into and reinforces these fantasies. It may also play into the therapist's illusion that if he or she cannot cure the patient no one else can either.

Some therapists also seem to have entered into the patient's fantasy of death as a reunion. Chabot's comment to Netty right before her death that she should think about her boys suggests that he too saw her death metaphorically as a return to her lost children. By metaphorizing death as something other than death, it is made to appear an attractive option. Not treating Netty as a patient but as a devoted mother whose desire to join her boys in death was not a sign of her disturbance but a legitimate and realizable goal makes it impossible to explore her guilt toward her children and her need for punishment.

From what Chabot was able to elicit in sessions with Netty, bereavement counseling was likely to fail with her, but psychotherapy less narrowly focused might have succeeded. Netty's personality problems far anteceded her bereavement. She said she became a person only when her first son was born and stayed alive only for the sake of her second son. Netty's guilt over her first son's suicide had sources that were deeper than her failure to have gotten a divorce. Caring for her second son seems to have had something of the quality of an atonement. One suspects that if therapy provided her with the opportunity to understand her relationship to her sons before deciding to join them in death, it might have engaged her.

No one should underestimate the grief of a mother who has lost a beloved child, but neither should one ignore the many ways life offers to deal with the feelings of loss, guilt and pain a child's death is likely to arouse. Certainly a decision to end life so soon after the death of her second son should not have been assisted or implemented. With or without treatment, time alone might well have made a difference.

The Dutch Supreme Court, which ruled on the case in June 1994, agreed with the lower courts in affirming that mental suffering can be grounds for euthanasia, but found Chabot guilty of not having had a psychiatric consultant actually see the patient. Although the court expressed the belief that a consultant's direct contact with a patient was particularly necessary in the absence of physical illness, it imposed no punishment since it felt that in all other regards Chabot had behaved responsibly. The case was seen as a triumph by euthanasia advocates, since it legally established mental suffering as a basis for euthanasia. Since the consultation can easily be obtained from a sympathetic colleague, it offers the patient little protection.

The acceptance of euthanasia for psychiatric patients who are suicidal seems the inevitable consequence of allowing such criteria as "competence" and "intolerable suffering" to determine the outcome rather than sound clinical judgment. The psychiatrist in some of the psychiatric cases is in the position of working to prevent suicide until the patient asks for his or her assistance in committing suicide and then the rules of the game change and the psychiatrist negotiates with the patient as to whose approach is best.

Seriously suicidal patients want suicide. In a society that makes euthanasia accessible for them they will be harder to treat, not easier. Many of them fantasize closeness in death with a person who kills them. When psychiatrists and general practitioners have complementary fantasies, euthanasia fulfills their needs as much as the patient's.

Dutch practice ignores what we know of the complex dynamics of the relation between the treatment of the suicidal and the desire of some who are seriously ill to end their lives. Suicidal patients are prone to make conditions of life that life cannot fulfill: "I won't live if I can't be in control," "without my husband," "if I lose my looks, power, prestige or health," or "if I am going to die soon." Depression, often precipitated by discovering a serious illness, exaggerates the tendency toward seeing problems in black-or-white terms (Hendin and Klerman 1993).

Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6