1. Freyd JJ. Rules of conscience: Betray ethics, betray trust. BMJ. 2009;338:b2191. cgi/content/full/bmj.b2191?ijkey=gLzS4bmfnLfb0xp&keytype=ref. Accessed October 12, 2009.
2. Pope KS, Gutheil TG. Contrasting ethical policies of physicians and psychologists concerning interrogation of detainees. BMJ. 2009;338:b1653. Accessed October 12, 2009.
3. Miles SH. Oath Betrayed: America’s Torture Doctors. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2009.
4. Miles SH. Psychologists and torture. BMJ. May 1, 2009. Accessed October 12, 2009.
5. Pope KS, Gutheil TG. Psychologists abandon the Nuremberg ethic: concerns for detainee interrogations. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32:161-166.
6. Godlee F. Rules of conscience. BMJ. 2009;338:b1972. Accessed October 12, 2009.
7. Tolin DF, Lohr JM. Psychologists, the American Psychological Association, and torture. Clinical Science Newsletter. 2009 (Fall):4-10.>. Accessed October 15, 2009.
8. Soldz S. Closing eyes to atrocities: US psychologists, detainee interrogations, and the response of the American Psychological Association. In: Goodman R, Roseman MJ, eds. Interrogations, Forced Feedings, and the Role of Health Professionals: New Perspectives on International Human Rights Humanitarian Law and Ethics (Harvard Law School Human Rights Program series). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009:103-142.
9. Eidelson R. No place to hide: torture, psychologists, and the APA. June 18, 2009. Accessed October 12, 2009.
10. Open letter in response to the American Psychological Association Board. June 29, 2009. Accessed October 12, 2009.