The Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS) is a 49-item self-report measure designed to assess all the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for PTSD.22,23 The PDS, which is based on the self-report counterpart of the PSS-I (PSS-SR) is the only stand-alone instrument that assesses all DSM-IV criteria.18 It was designed as a screening instrument to identify PTSD in the general population or in a population of trauma survivors. The PDS is psychometrically sound.23
There is strong internal consistency and good test-retest reliability across the 17 symptom items of the PDS.22 The PDS correlates well with self-report measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. The PDS total severity score and the total number of symptoms endorsed significantly discriminate persons with and without a PTSD diagnosis based on the SCID PTSD module. The PDS has adequate diagnostic utility against the SCID.
The PDS was developed with careful attention to content validity. It yields both a continuous measure of symptom severity and a PTSD diagnosis, and it has excellent psychometric properties. The PDS has been translated into numerous languages and its psychometric properties, which were examined in several cultures, replicate those found in the original study.
The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is a 17-item self-report measure of PTSD developed at the National Center for PTSD in 1990.24 The 17 PCL items correspond to the 17 DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD. Respondents rate how much they have been bothered by each symptom during the past month using a 5-point scale. The PCL yields a continuous measure of PTSD symptom severity for each of the 3 symptom clusters and for the whole syndrome.
The PCL has been widely adopted (especially by Veterans Administration systems) and extensively evaluated, and it has excellent psychometric properties across a variety of trauma populations.24-26 The PCL also correlates strongly with other measures of PTSD and combat exposure, and it has demonstrated good diagnostic utility against the SCID PTSD module.
The Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) is another 17-item self-report measure that assesses DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for PTSD.27 The format is similar to that of the CAPS in that the frequency and severity of each symptom is rated on separate 4-point scales. The time frame for ratings is the past week. This allows for frequent administrations, which is valuable in treatment outcome studies but limits the use of the DTS as a diagnostic measure.
The DTS appears to have good psychometric properties.27 It has high internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability. It also demonstrates good convergent and discriminant validity and correlates strongly with several other PTSD measures. In addition, the DTS distinguishes between PTSD severity, and it is sensitive to changes in PTSD severity as a function of treatment. Finally, the DTS demonstrates good diagnostic utility against the SCID PTSD module.
The DTS appears to be a useful measure of PTSD. It is well suited for tracking changes in symptom severity in treatment outcome studies and has been widely adopted for this purpose.28 One limitation is that little additional psychometric work has been conducted, so it is not clear how well the original findings can be generalized to other samples and settings.
Developed before the formal recognition of PTSD as a mental disorder in DSM-III, the Impact of Event Scale (IES) is the oldest standardized measure of posttraumatic symptoms.29 Weiss and Marmar30 developed a 22-item revised version (IES-R) by adding 6 hyperarousal items and 1 dissociative item and by changing the response dimension from symptom frequency to degree of subjective distress, expanding the number of response options from 4 to 5 and relabeling the anchors. The IES-R demonstrates the same high level of reliability and validity as the original IES.31 Both versions can be used effectively to assess trauma-related symptoms.
The Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related PTSD (Mississippi Scale) is a 35-item self-report measure of PTSD symptoms and associated features.32 Items are rated on a 5-point scale with anchors that vary according to item content. The Mississippi Scale is the most widely used measure of combat-related PTSD. It has excellent psychometric properties and was selected as the primary PTSD measure in the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study (NVVRS).6,32-35
1. Herman JL. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books; 1992.
2. Wilson JP. PTSD and complex PTSD: symptoms, syndromes, and diagnoses. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004:7-44.
3. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:1048-1060.
4. Schnurr PP, Green BL, Kaltman SI. Trauma exposure and physical health. In: Friedman MJ, Keane TM, Resick PA, eds. Handbook of PTSD: Science and Practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2007:406-424.
5. Keane TM, Wolfe J, Taylor KL. Post-traumatic stress disorder: evidence for diagnostic validity and methods of psychological assessment. J Clin Psychol. 1987;43:32-43.
6. Kulka RA, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA, et al. Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: prospects and pitfalls from recent studies of Vietnam veterans. Psychol Assess. 1991;3:547-560.
7. Marsella AJ, Friedman MJ, Gerrity ET, Schurfield RM, eds. Ethnocultural Aspects of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Issues, Research, and Clinical Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996.
8. Kimerling R, Ouimette PC, Wolfe J, eds. Gender and PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002.
9. Weathers FW, Keane TM, Foa EB. Assessment and diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Foa EB, Keane TM, Friedman MJ, Cohen JA, eds. Effective Treatment for PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008.
10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
11. Breslau N, Kessler RC, Chilcoat HD, et al. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: the 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:626-632.
12. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbons M, Williams JB. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinical Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1996.
13. Keane TM, Kolb LC, Kaloupek DG, et al. Utility of psychophysiological measurement in the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:914-923.
14. Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender D, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. J Personal Disord. 2000;14:291-299.
15. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR. Attainment and maintenance of reliability of axis I and II disorders over the course of a longitudinal study. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42:369-374.
16. Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, et al. A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: the CAPS-1. Behav Ther. 1990;13:187-188.
17. Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, et al. The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. J Trauma Stress. 1995;8:75-90.
18. Foa EB, Riggs DS, Dancu CV, Rothbaum BO. Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assess-ing post-traumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 1993;6:459-473.
19. Foa EB, Tolin DF. Comparison of the PTSD Symptom Scale–Interview Version and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. J Trauma Stress. 2000;13:181-191.
20. Davidson JR, Smith RD, Kudler HS. Validity and reliability of the DSM-III criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder: experience with a structured interview. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1989;177:336-341.
21. Davidson JR, Malik MA, Travers J. Structured interview for PTSD (SIP): psychometric validation for DSM-IV criteria. Depress Anxiety. 1997;5:127-129.
22. Foa EB. Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale [Manual]. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1995.
23. Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox LH, Perry KJ. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychol Assess. 1997;9:445-451.
24. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, et al. The PTSD Checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at: the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993; San Antonio, TX.
25. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:669-673.
26. Ruggiero KJ, Del Ben K, Scotti JR, Rabalais AE. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist—Civilian Version. J Trauma Stress. 2003;16:495-502.
27. Davidson JR. Davidson Trauma Scale. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems; 1996.
28. Davidson JR, Tharwani HM, Connor KM. Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): normative scores in the general population and effect sizes in placebo-controlled SSRI trials. Depress Anxiety. 2002;15:75-78.
29. Horowitz MJ, Wilner NR, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209-218.
30. Weiss DS, Marmar CR. The Impact of Event Scale–Revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press; 1997:399-411.
31. Weiss DS. The Impact of Event Scale–Revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004:168-189.
32. Keane TM, Caddell JM, Taylor KL. Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: three studies in reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:85-90.
33. King LA, King DW. Latent structure of the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: exploratory and higher-order confirmatory factor analyses. Assessment. 1994;1:275-291.
34. King DW, King LA, Fairbank JA, et al. Enhancing the precision of the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: an application of item response theory. Psychol Assess. 1993;5:457-471.
35. McFall ME, Smith DE, Mackay PW, Tarver DJ. Reliability and validity of the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Psychol Assess. 1990;2:114-121.
36. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Manual for Administration and Scoring. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1951.
37. Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, et al. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. Rev ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2001.
38. Penk WE, Rierdan J, Losardo M, Robinowitz R. The MMPI-2 and assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In: Butcher JN, ed. MMPI-2: A Practitioner’s Guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006.
39. Morey LC. Personality Assessment Inventory Professional Manual. 2nd ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2007.