Cognitive Rehabilitation in Schizophrenia
Cognitive Rehabilitation in Schizophrenia
Patients with schizophrenia have profound and disabling cognitive deficits. More so than positive or negative symptoms, cognitive deficits impair daily functioning and contribute most to chronic disability and unemployment.1,2
Unlike the psychotic symptoms, these deficits do not improve during periods of remission and change only minimally with antipsychotic medications.3,4
Given the enormous impact that cognitive dysfunction has on the daily lives of persons with schizophrenia, researchers and clinicians have been working for more than 2 decades on strategies to improve cognition in this population.
In this article, we summarize general concepts in cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Our goal is to provide a basic framework for clinicians who are planning to initiate a cognitive remediation (CR) program for their patients.
Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia
In persons with schizophrenia, cognitive impairments are detectable as early as age 6 or 7 years, or the earliest age at which children receive any formal psychological tests.5-8 The underlying pathology is almost certainly present in some form at birth. By first grade, children in whom schizophrenia develops are already performing at nearly a full grade equivalent below their peers.5 There appears to be a period of further cognitive decline (or rather, failure to make age-appropriate gains) between the ages of 12 and 17—several years before the first psychotic episode.5,6,9 After the first episode, and the patient has stabilized clinically, the cognitive deficits remain fairly stable.10-12 At that point, scores of global cognition range from between 1 and 2 standard deviations below those of healthy cohorts.13,14
While all domains of cognition are affected in schizophrenia, there are selective areas of increased impairment—particularly verbal and visuospatial memory, attention, executive function, and speed of processing (Table 1).15-20 Verbal memory impairments are the most robust and the most profound.10,14-16,18 Impairments in cognition are not related to illness state and are present and stable even during periods of positive-symptom remission. In fact, positive symptoms and cognitive deficits are only negligibly correlated.21 However, negative and disorganization symptoms show modest correlations with cognition.21,22
Functional consequences of cognitive deficits
Relative to the positive, negative, and disorganization symptom domains, cognition is the strongest predictor of functional outcome.1,2 Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia have been shown to interfere with various aspects of daily functioning, including employment, independent living, and quality of life.23-26 In 2 literature reviews, Green and colleagues1,2 demonstrated that 4 specific neurocognitive domains were significantly associated with functional outcomes: executive functioning, immediate verbal memory, secondary verbal memory, and vigilance. Community activity (eg, working, going to school) was predicted by measures of executive functioning and secondary verbal memory. Social problem-solving skills were associated with levels of secondary verbal memory, vigilance and, to a lesser extent, executive functioning. Psychosocial skill acquisition was most frequently linked with immediate and secondary verbal memory.2
Definition of cognitive rehabilitation
There are 2 main techniques in cognitive rehabilitation: remediation and compensatory approaches. CR is designed to stimulate new learning, or relearning, of cognitive tasks, and thus, to improve domains of deficit. Compensatory approaches seek to make improvements in the patient’s functioning by avoiding areas of impairment and recruiting other intact cognitive domains or by creating a supportive external environment.27
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is profound, is enduring, and significantly negatively affects functional outcome and the ability to live and work independently.
This article reviews methods to rehabilitate cognition in schizophrenia and suggests strategies for instituting a cognitive remediation (CR) program.
For clinicians interested in CR for their patients, this article describes the basic structure of such a program and gives references for relevant and useful resources.
Compensatory approaches aim not only to improve cognitive functioning by reducing errors in the learning process but also to minimize impediments to activities of daily living and to create a supportive home environment. Errorless learning (EL) and cognitive adaptation training (CAT) are 2 compensatory approaches that have yielded successful outcomes when they are used in patients with schizophrenia.
EL is guided by the theory that certain neurologically impaired groups, including persons with schizophrenia, have difficulty in learning when their mistakes are corrected in an effort to guide future behavior.28 EL aims to eliminate any errors when new tasks are being learned. This approach reduces each new task to be learned into small component parts that are then overlearned through “imitative learning and repetitive practice of perfect task execution.” By doing so, EL relies on implicit memory processes; this provides an advantage for patients whose explicit memory abilities are compromised. Implicit learning refers to learning that occurs unconsciously and that is often procedural (eg, riding a bike). In contrast, explicit learning is conscious and is often more information-based.
Compensatory strategies have also been applied to the schizophrenia patient’s home environment. CAT introduces environmental adaptations that are suited specifically to the executive impairments common among schizophrenia patients. Its aim is to reduce the cognitive burdens, functional requirements, and overall stress of everyday living in each patient’s personal space.29
During home visits, CAT therapists check for safety hazards and ensure that necessary supplies are available. The therapists may also assist in modifying and reorganizing the home in a manner customized to the individual patient’s needs. For example, in the bedroom, clothing drawers are labeled and colored bins are used for the sorting of dirty and clean clothes. In the bathroom, grooming supplies are moved to be more easily accessible and pill containers are introduced to organize medications. In addition, patients can be trained to use watches or other devices with alarms to cue themselves to take medications and complete other tasks.30
Cognitive remediation techniques
While early CR programs used paper and pencil tasks, most are now computerized. Some remediation programs use a mix of general educational software, but many train participants with specialized computer software designed to improve cognition (Table 2).31 Often the software is adapted from computer exercises for remediating age-related cognitive decline, brain injuries, or learning disabilities in children.32,33 Currently, most programs use a form of drill and practice training, which refers to the use of hundreds of trials of the same exercise to “push” intrinsic learning systems that are hypothesized to be intact in schizophrenia.34 Because of its repetitive nature, drill and practice runs the risk of boring participants. This is mitigated by the use of computer game–like motivations and rewards, such as colors, noises, increasing scores, and encouraging words.
A few CR programs focus primarily on a strategy-coaching approach, in which the therapist and a small group of patients discuss methods and strategies to improve cognition and to use cognitive-training exercises. Strategy-coaching methods do not usually focus on the repetition of hundreds of trials per exercise; rather, they place more emphasis on developing and maintaining motivation in the participants.31
The Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Rehabilitation (NEAR) method uses a strategy-coaching approach.31 This approach also includes small-group sessions (bridging groups) that occur after the computerized CR portion of the training. Participants discuss strategies that they learned while practicing the tasks as well as how the skills they are learning in the sessions can be generalized to real-world activities, such as independent living and employment. In a 2007 meta-analysis, McGurk and colleagues35 found that the combination of drill and practice training and strategy coaching was more effective than either system alone.
Most CR programs aim to improve the cognitive domains usually associated with deficits in schizophrenia—for instance verbal and visual working memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed. This is a top-down approach in which the target of training is a higher-order cognitive process.
Fisher and colleagues36 adopted a computerized remediation program called Posit Science. This program focuses on early auditory and visual sensory processes, such as tone and phoneme discrimination, as well as higher-order cognitive processes, such as verbal memory. Vinogradov believes that focusing on early sensory processing in schizophrenia is important because previous research findings indicate that there are early sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia.37 By improving these early sensory processes, there will be a bottom-up improvement in higher-order cognitive domains.
To date, there has been no head-to-head comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches. While almost all CR programs use at least some repetitive practice of cogni-tive exercises to target domains of deficit, many also include other unique components beyond drill and practice.
Cognitive enhancement therapy (CET), developed by Hogarty and colleagues,38 includes small-group sessions that emphasize social cognition. CET improves neurocognition and shows trends toward improving social cognition. In a randomized trial using CET, improvements in neurocognition and some aspects of social cognition independently predicted improvements in functional outcome.
Neurocognitive enhancement therapy (NET), a program that was developed by Bell and colleagues,39 pairs a drill and practice style computerized CR with vocational rehabilitation programs. His team has demonstrated that the combination of the two improves work outcomes significantly compared with vocational rehabilitation alone.
McGurk and colleagues40 also pair CR with a supported employment program. Their Thinking Skills for Work program has 4 components:
• Cognitive assessment and job loss analysis that identifies the role of cognitive deficits in past job performance and motivates patient participation in the cognitive training program
• Computer-based cognitive training sessions
• Discussion of cognitive gains made following the completion of training and future-oriented planning with the patient and employment specialist
• Ongoing follow-up between the employment specialist and the patient to develop additional compensatory strategies to manage cognitive deficits interfering with job performance
Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation
Compensatory strategies. Kern and colleagues28 explored the effectiveness of EL in community settings. The results of their work show improvement in the learning of simple entry-level job tasks, such as index card filing and toilet tank assembly. Another community-based study used EL to train participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in entry-level tasks at a thrift-type clothing store and found significantly better work quality when compared with participants trained using conventional methods.41
Randomized studies have demonstrated that CAT results in greater adaptive function, better quality of life, and fewer positive symptoms than other forms of psychosocial treatment.42 CAT has also been associated with a reduced incidence of re-hospitalization and with improved levels of motivation and community functioning.43 While EL and CAT use different compensatory approaches, both appear to be beneficial in the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.
Cognitive remediation. CR has been demonstrated to improve overall (global) cognition as well as specific domains, including attention, executive function, working memory, verbal learning and memory, processing speed, and affect recognition.38-40,44-47 The effect sizes for improvements in cognitive domains generally fall into the small to moderate range (about 0.3 to 0.6).35,45 Effect sizes for improvements in global cognition tend to be in the moderate range as well.35,45 (Of note, moderate effect sizes are generally considered meaningful in the social sciences, but the improvements in cognition after CR merely attenuate the degree of deficit, which still remains large compared with that in control subjects.) These improvements in cognition often persist after CR has ended.35 In their study, Hogarty and colleagues48 tested participants 12 months after the completion of CET and reported that improvements in processing speed, cognitive style, social cognition, and social adjustment persisted.
Furthermore, results from a randomized controlled trial using MRI data indicate that 2 years of CET therapy resulted in decreased gray matter loss in several areas of the cortex and increased gray matter in the amygdala in participants with early-onset schizophrenia.49 However, not all studies have found that CR improved cognitive performance. Dickinson and colleagues50 conducted a randomized controlled trial and reported that while CR improved cognitive domains and global cognition when tested on the same exercises included in the remediation program, neither global cognition nor any cognitive domain improved when tested with a standardized neurocognitive battery. This study illustrates the potential danger of training to the test or of testing subjects using cognitive batteries too similar to the tasks practiced in the CR program.
Effect on functional outcome and quality of life
The ultimate goal of all the programs discussed is the successful transfer of gains made in CR to improvements in functional outcome and quality of life. Multiple studies have shown improvements in measures of functional capacity or functional outcome after CR. In addition, improvements in global cognition as a result of CR have been demonstrated to mediate improvements in measures of functional outcome.51 However, it appears that for CR to best translate into improvements in functional outcome, it should be paired with some other psychosocial rehabilitation program, such as vocational rehabilitation or social skills training. Findings from the meta-analysis by McGurk and colleagues35 showed that CR in conjunction with other psychiatric rehabilitation programs improved psychosocial functioning measures more than just CR alone.
CR has been shown to enhance the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation and to lead to higher employment rates, more hours or weeks worked, and higher wages, both in noncompetitive and competitive employment.40,44,50-54 Not all studies have found improvements in functional outcome with CR, however.50,55
Schizophrenia is associated with severe cognitive deficits that interfere significantly with daily functioning and quality of life. Compensatory programs can recruit intact cognitive skills or marshal environmental supports to improve functioning. CR lessens cognitive deficits, and when paired with other rehabilitation programs, can lead to lasting improvements in cognition and daily functioning.
Keep in mind that persons with schizophrenia often have poor insight into their cognitive deficits, which potentially limits the appeal of time-consuming remediation programs.56 Clinicians may need to frame the goals of CR in very concrete terms to encourage participation in the program.
1. Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:321-330.
2. Green MF, Kern RS, Braff DL, Mintz J. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the “right stuff”? Schizophr Bull. 2000;26:119-136.
3. Bratti IM, Bilder RM. Neurocognitive deficits and first-episode schizophrenia; characterization and course. In: Sharma T, Harvey PD, eds. The Early Course of Schizophrenia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
4. Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Davis SM, et al; CATIE Investigators; Neurocognitive Working Group. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:633-647.
5. Bilder RM, Reiter G, Bates J, et al. Cognitive development in schizophrenia: follow-back from the first episode. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:270-282.
6. Fuller R, Nopoulos P, Arndt S, et al. Longitudinal assessment of premorbid cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia through examination of standardized scholastic test performance. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1183-1189.
7. Kremen WS, Buka SL, Seidman LJ, et al. IQ decline during childhood and adult psychotic symptoms in a community sample: a 19-year longitudinal study. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:672-677.
8. Bilder RM, Reiter G, Bernstein K, et al. Deterioration of cognitive function accompanies the onset of schizophrenia: from premorbid SAT to postmorbid FSIQ. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:157.
9. Ang YG, Tan HY. Academic deterioration prior to first episode schizophrenia in young Singaporean males. Psychiatry Res. 2004;121:303-307.
10. Hoff AL, Sakuma M, Wieneke M, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological follow-up study of patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1336-1341.
11. Russell AJ, Munro JC, Jones PB, et al. Schizophrenia and the myth of intellectual decline. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:635-639.
12. Aylward E, Walker E, Bettes B. Intelligence in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of the research. Schizophr Bull. 1984;10:430-459.
13. Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology. 1998;12:426-445.
14. Bilder RM, Goldman RS, Robinson D, et al. Neuropsychology of first-episode schizophrenia: initial characterization and clinical correlates. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:549-559.
15. Addington J, Brooks BL, Addington D. Cognitive functioning in first episode psychosis: initial presentation. Schizophr Res. 2003;62:59-64.
16. Censits DM, Ragland JD, Gur RC, Gur RE. Neuropsychological evidence supporting a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: a longitudinal study. Schizophr Res. 1997;24:289-298.
17. Mohamed S, Paulsen JS, O’Leary D, et al. Generalized cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a study of first-episode patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:749-754.
18. Saykin AJ, Shtasel DL, Gur RE, et al. Neuropsychological deficits in neuroleptic naive patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:124-131.
19. Riley EM, McGovern D, Mockler D, et al. Neuropsychological functioning in first-episode psychosis—evidence of specific deficits. Schizophr Res. 2000;43:47-55.
20. Townsend LA, Malla AK, Norman RM. Cognitive functioning in stabilized first-episode psychosis patients. Psychiatry Res. 2001;104:119-131.
21. Nieuwenstein MR, Aleman A, de Haan EH. Relationship between symptom dimensions and neurocognitive functioning in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of WCST and CPT studies. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Continuous Performance Test. J Psychiatr Res. 2001;35:119-125.
22. Heydebrand G, Weiser M, Rabinowitz J, et al. Correlates of cognitive deficits in first episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004;68:1-9.
23. Bell MD, Bryson G. Work rehabilitation in schizophrenia: does cognitive impairment limit improvement? Schizophr Bull. 2001;27:269-279.
24. Twamley EW, Doshi RR, Nayak GV, et al. Generalized cognitive impairments, ability to perform everyday tasks, and level of independence in community living situations of older patients with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:2013-2020.
25. Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Kaczynski R, et al. Association of symptomatology and cognitive deficits to functional capacity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;99:192-199.
26. Mohamed S, Rosenheck R, Swartz M, et al. Relationship of cognition and psychopathology to functional impairment in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:978-987.
27. Kern RS, Glynn SM, Horan WP, Marder SR. Psychosocial treatments to promote functional recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:347-361.
28. Kern RS, Liberman RP, Kopelowicz A, et al. Applications of errorless learning for improving work performance in persons with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1921-1926.
29. Velligan DI, Diamond PM, Mintz J, et al. The use of individually tailored environmental supports to improve medication adherence and outcomes in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34:483-493.
30. Draper ML, Stutes DS, Maples NJ, Velligan DI. Cognitive adaptation training for outpatients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:842-853.
31. Medalia A, Revheim N, Herlands T. Cognitive Remediation for Psychological Disorders: Therapist Guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
32. Fisher M, Holland C, Subramaniam K, Vinogradov S. Neuroplasticity-based cognitive training in schizophrenia: an interim report on the effects 6 months later. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:869-879.
33. Hogarty GE, Flesher S. Practice principles of cognitive enhancement therapy for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25:693-708.
34. Koch K, Wagner G, Nenadic I, et al. Temporal modeling demonstrates preserved overlearning processes in schizophrenia: an fMRI study. Neuroscience. 2007;146:1474-1483.
35. McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1791-1802.
36. Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:805-811.
37. Leitman DI, Hoptman MJ, Foxe JJ, et al. The neural substrates of impaired prosodic detection in schizophrenia and its sensorial antecedents. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:474-482.
38. Hogarty GE, Flesher S, Ulrich R, et al. Cognitive enhancement therapy for schizophrenia: effects of a 2-year randomized trial on cognition and behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:866-876.
39. Bell M, Bryson G, Greig T, et al. Neurocognitive enhancement therapy with work therapy: effects on neuropsychological test performance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:763-768.
40. McGurk SR, Mueser KT, DeRosa TJ, Wolfe R. Work, recovery, and comorbidity in schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:319-335.
41. Kern RS, Liberman RP, Becker DR, et al. Errorless learning for training individuals with schizophrenia at a community mental health setting providing work experience. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:807-815.
42. Velligan DI, Prihoda TJ, Ritch JL, et al. A randomized single-blind pilot study of compensatory strategies in schizophrenia outpatients. Schizophr Bull. 2002;28:283-292.
43. Velligan DI, Bow-Thomas CC. Two case studies of cognitive adaptation training for outpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:25-29.
44. Lindenmayer JP, McGurk SR, Mueser KT, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation among inpatients with persistent mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59:241-247.
45. Grynszpan O, Perbal S, Pelissolo A, et al. Efficacy and specificity of computer-assisted cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: a meta-analytical study. Psychol Med. 2011;41:163-173.
46. Hodge MA, Siciliano D, Withey P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:419-427.
47. Sartory G, Zorn C, Groetzinger G, Windgassen K. Computerized cognitive remediation improves verbal learning and processing speed in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;75:219-223.
48. Hogarty GE, Greenwald DP, Eack SM. Durability and mechanism of effects of cognitive enhancement therapy. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1751-1757.
49. Eack SM, Hogarty GE, Cho RY, et al. Neuroprotective effects of cognitive enhancement therapy against gray matter loss in early schizophrenia: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:674-682.
50. Dickinson D, Tenhula W, Morris S, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:170-180.
51. Eack SM, Pogue-Geile MF, Greenwald DP, et al. Mechanisms of functional improvement in a 2-year trial of cognitive enhancement therapy for early schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2010 Sep 22:1-9; [Epub ahead of print].
52. McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Pascaris A. Cognitive training and supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: one-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31:898-909.
53. Vauth R, Corrigan PW, Clauss M, et al. Cognitive strategies versus self-management skills as adjunct to vocational rehabilitation. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31:55-66.
54. Bell MD, Zito W, Greig T, Wexler BE. Neurocognitive enhancement therapy with vocational services: work outcomes at two-year follow-up. Schizophr Res. 2008;105:18-29.
55. d’Amato T, Bation R, Cochet A, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2010 Nov 18; [Epub ahead of print].
56. Medalia A, Thysen J. Insight into neurocognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34:1221-1230.
57. Bell M, Bryson G, Wexler BE. Cognitive remediation of working memory deficits: durability of train-ing effects in severely impaired and less severely impaired schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;108:101-109.
58. McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Feldman K, et al. Cognitive training for supported employment: 2-3 year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:437-441.
59. McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Harvey PD, et al. Cognitive and symptom predictors of work outcomes for clients with schizophrenia in supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:1129-1135.
60. Medalia A, Choi J. Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19:353-364.
61. Medalia A, Lim R. Treatment of cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Pract. 2004;10:17-25.
62. Medalia A, Revheim N, Casey M. Remediation of memory disorders in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2000;30:1451-1459.
63. Medalia A, Richardson R. What predicts a good response to cognitive remediation interventions? Schizophr Bull. 2005;31:942-953.