We've noticed that you're using an ad blocker

Our content is brought to you free of charge because of the support of our advertisers. To continue enjoying our content, please turn off your ad blocker.

It's off now Dismiss How do I disable my ad blocker?
❌

How to disable your ad blocker for our site:

Adblock / Adblock Plus
  • Click on the AdBlock / AdBlock Plus icon on the top right of your browser.
  • Click “Don’t run on pages on this domain.” OR “Enabled on this site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Firefox Tracking Prevention
  • If you are Private Browsing in Firefox, "Tracking Protection" may casue the adblock notice to show. It can be temporarily disabled by clicking the "shield" icon in the address bar.
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Ghostery
  • Click the Ghostery icon on your browser.
  • In Ghostery versions < 6.0 click “Whitelist site.” in version 6.0 click “Trust site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
uBlock / uBlock Origin
  • Click the uBlock / uBlock Origin icon on your browser.
  • Click the “power” button in the menu that appears to whitelist the current website
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
  • Topics
  • CME
  • Special Reports
  • Slideshows
  • Quizzes
  • Blogs
  • Conferences
  • Classifieds
  • Archives

Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Skip to main content
Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Menu
User
Home
  • Topics
  • CME
  • Special Reports
  • Slideshows
  • Quizzes
  • Blogs
  • Conferences
  • Classifieds
  • Archives

SUBSCRIBE: eNewsletter

Stalkers and Their Victims

  • Paul E. Mullen, MBBS, DSc
  • Michele Pathé, MBBS
Apr 1, 2001
Volume: 
23
Issue: 
4
  • Trauma And Violence, Addiction, Forensic Psychiatry

 

More Like This

Stalking: The Veiled Epidemic

Being Stalked--An Occupational Hazard?

Comprehensive Treatment of Stalking Victims

Psychiatrists and Clinical Sexuality

More > >

"Stalking" is defined as repeated and persistent unwanted communications and/or approaches that produce fear in the victim. The stalker may use such means as telephone calls, letters, e-mail, graffiti and placing notices in the media. A stalker may approach or follow the victim, or keep their residence under surveillance. Stalking is often associated with other forms of harassment, such as ordering goods on the victim's behalf, sending unsolicited materials and initiating spurious legal actions (Mullen et al., 1999). Stalking intrudes on the victim's privacy and evokes a fear of violence. Such fears are justified, as threats, property damage and assault occur all too frequently in association with stalking.

Community surveys suggest that each year between 1% and 2% of women and 0.25% to 0.5% of men are stalked (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996; Tjaden and Thoennes, 1998). Although these behaviors have been documented for centuries, stalking has been recognized as a social problem only during the last decade (Meloy, 1999; Mullen et al., 2000). The media began using the word stalking in the late 1980s to describe persistent following of celebrities. It was soon generalized to include a wide range of recurrent harassments and an equally diverse range of victims. Successful media campaigns established stalking as a public issue and stimulated legislative changes to allow the more effective prosecution of stalkers.

California passed the first anti-stalking statute in 1990, followed shortly by the rest of the United States as well as Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and now some European countries. It was only after stalking became a specific form of offensive behavior that behavioral scientists and health care professionals began to systematically study stalkers and, equally important, the impact of their conduct on the victims.

The Stalker's Victim

Stalking is predominantly a victim-defined crime. The victim's fear changes the perception of the behaviors from inappropriate, intrusive and inept, to damaging and criminal. This is not to trivialize being stalked, but to place the experience of the victim in its proper place as the defining characteristic.

A criminal offence usually requires both criminal intent and an action. A significant proportion of stalkers, however, have no obvious criminal intentions. For example, they might wish to initiate a new relationship or restore a lost one. It is the way in which they pursue their apparently benign goals that a reasonable person might find distressing and frightening. Anti-stalking laws, if they are to be effective, have to define the offence in terms of the victim's reactions and not the perpetrator's intentions (Gilligan, 1992; McAnaney et al., 1993; Sohn, 1994).

The impact on the victim's psychological and social well-being is considerable. Path and Mullen (1997) studied 100 victims of persistent stalking. The majority had to severely restrict their lives by changing or abandoning work, curtailing all social activities, and becoming virtual recluses. Over 80% developed significant anxiety symptoms. Sleep disturbance was common, and many resorted to substance abuse. Over half had symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Feelings of powerlessness and depression were common, and nearly a quarter of the victims were actively considering suicide as a means of escape. Similar levels of distress and disturbance were reported in Hall's study (1998).

Several classifications of victims have been proposed, usually on the basis of the stalker's relationship to them (Fremouw et al., 1997; Meloy and Gothard, 1995; Zona et al., 1993). Harmon and colleagues (1995), for example, separated prior relationships into personal, professional, employment, media, acquaintance or none. Personal victims are most likely to be stalked by an ex-partner. These victims often reported having been subjected to domestic violence prior to the end of the relationship (Tjaden and Thoennes, 1998). They are typically exposed to a wide range of harassments and are the most likely to be assaulted (Harmon et al., 1998; Meloy, 1998; Mullen et al., 1999). Professional victims (such as health care providers, lawyers and teachers, who come into contact with the lonely, the inadequate and the aggrieved) are particularly vulnerable. When stalking first emerged as an issue, it was thought to be a problem peculiar to celebrities. Now it is recognized that virtually anyone can fall victim to a stalker.

The Violence of Stalkers

Disclosures: 
Dr Mullen is professor of forensic psychiatry at Monash University in Australia and clinical director of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health.Dr Path is assistant clinical director of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health.

 

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
References: 

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996), Women's Safety, Australia 1996. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Fremouw WJ, Westrup D, Pennypacker J (1997), Stalking on campus: the prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. J Forensic Sci 42(4):666-669.

Gilligan MJ (1992), Stalking the stalker: developing new laws to thwart those who terrorize others. Georgia Law Review 27:285-342.

Hall DM (1998), The victims of stalking. In: The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives, Meloy JR, ed. San Diego: Academic Press, pp113-137.

Harmon RB, Rosner R, Owens H (1998), Sex and violence in a forensic population of obsessional harassers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4(1/2):236-249.

Harmon RB, Rosner R, Owens H (1995), Obsessional harassment and erotomania in a criminal court population. J Forensic Sci 40(2):188-196.

Kienlen KK, Birmingham DL, Solberg KB et al. (1997), A comparative study of psychotic and nonpsychotic stalking. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 25(3):317-334.

McAnaney K, Curliss L, Abeyta-Price CE (1993), From imprudence to crime: anti-stalking laws. Notre Dame Law Review 68(4):830-849.

Meloy JR (1999), Stalking: An old behavior, a new crime. Psychiatr Clin North Am 22(1):85-99.

Meloy JR (1998), The psychology of stalking. In: The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives, Meloy JR, ed. San Diego: Academic Press, pp2-23.

Meloy JR, Gothard S (1995), A demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 152(2):258-263.

Mullen PE, Pathý M, Purcell R (2000), Stalkers and Their Victims. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

Mullen PE, Pathý M, Purcell R, Stuart GW (1999), Study of stalkers. Am J Psychiatry 156(8):1244-1249.

Pathý M, Mullen PE (1997), The impact of stalkers on their victims. Br J Psychiatry 170:12-17.

Sohn EF (1994), Antistalking statutes: do they actually protect victims? Criminal Law Bulletin 30:203-241.

Tjaden P, Thoennes N (1998), Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Zona MA, Sharma KK, Lane J (1993), A comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. J Forensic Sci 38(4):894-903.

Related Articles

  • Online Communities for Drug Withdrawal: What Can We Learn?
  • Opioid Overdoses and Naloxone: What Everyone Needs to Know
  • Opioid Use in the Elderly
  • Mini Quiz: Prescribing for Patients With SUDS
  • Mini Quiz: Alcohol and Sleep

Resource Topics rightRail

  • Resource Topics
  • Partner Content
ADHD
Schizophrenia
Bipolar Disorder
Geriatric Psychiatry
Major Depressive Disorder
Smart IOP – A New Kind of Intensive Outpatient Program
Three Things Mental Health Professionals Need to Know About Telemedicine – TODAY!
How Telemedicine Can Transform Patient Engagement

Current Issue

Psychiatric Times Vol 35 No 3
Mar 12, 2018 Vol 32 No 3
Digital Edition
Subscribe
Connect with Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Modern Medicine Network
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Advertiser Terms
  • Privacy statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Editorial & Advertising Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
Modern Medicine Network
© UBM 2018, All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.