OR WAIT null SECS
Overdiagnosis of bipolar disorder is as important to guard against as its underdiagnosis. The use of bipolar disorder screening tools is questioned.
Bipolar disorder is a serious illness resulting in significant psychosocial morbidity and excess mortality. Through the years a number of research reports, reviews, and commentaries have suggested that bipolar disorder is underrecognized, and that many patients, particularly those with major depressive disorder, have, in fact, bipolar disorder.1-10 Even for those patients in whom bipolar disorder is eventually diagnosed, the lag between initial treatment seeking and the correct diagnosis is often more than 10 years.11,12 The treatment and clinical implications of the failure to recognize bipolar disorder in depressed patients include the underprescription of mood stabilizing medications, an increased risk of rapid cycling, and increased costs of care.4,13-15 Recommendations for improving the detection of bipolar disorder include careful clinical evaluations inquiring about a history of mania and hypomania and the use of screening questionnaires.1,7,8,16
Although the research is less robust, some studies have also found that bipolar disorder is sometimes overdiagnosed. Stewart and El-Mallakh17 evaluated 21 patients with a substance use disorder who were admitted for residential treatment and had been previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Only 9 (42.9%) were diagnosed with bipolar disorder when administered a semi-structured interview. The other 12 patients were diagnosed with a substance-induced mood disorder. Goldberg and colleagues18 evaluated 85 patients admitted to an inpatient dual diagnosis unit specializing in the treatment of mood and substance use disorders who had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder by their outpatient psychiatrist. Similar to the results of Stewart and El-Mallakh, only a minority of the patients (32.9%) had the diagnosis of bipolar disorder confirmed.
As part of the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, our clinical-research group conducted the largest study of bipolar disorder underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis.19 We used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) to interview 700 psychiatric outpatients presenting for treatment. Before the interview, the patients completed a self-administered questionnaire which asked them whether they had been previously diagnosed by a health care professional with bipolar or manic-depressive disorder. Family history information was obtained from the patients regarding their first-degree relatives. Slightly more than 20% of the sample reported that they had been previously diagnosed as having bipolar disorder (n = 145, 20.7%), significantly higher than the 12.9% rate based on the SCID. More than half (56.6%, n = 82) of 145 patients who reported that they had a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder did not have a diagnosis of bipolar disorder based on the SCID. Bipolar disorder was also underdiagnosed in some patients, but three times as many patients had been overdiagnosed as had been underdiagnosed (82 v 27).
Patients with SCID diagnosed bipolar disorder had a significantly higher morbid risk of bipolar disorder in their first-degree relatives than patients who self-reported a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not confirmed by the SCID. A family history of bipolar disorder was similar in patients who self-reported a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not confirmed by the SCID and patients who were negative for bipolar disorder by self-report and the SCID. Thus, the results of the study suggested that bipolar disorder was sometimes underdiagnosed, more often overdiagnosed, and the family history analyses supported the validity of the diagnostic procedures.
In a follow-up to this initial study we examined whether there was a particular diagnostic profile associated with bipolar disorder overdiagnosis.20 We compared the diagnostic characteristics of 2 groups of patients who were not diagnosed with bipolar disorder based on the SCID interview—those who reported previously being diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n = 82) and those had not been so diagnosed in the past (n = 528). We conducted a logistic regression analysis to examine which diagnoses were independently associated with bipolar disorder overdiagnosis and found that borderline personality disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and any impulse control disorder were independently associated with bipolar disorder overdiagnosis. Nearly 40% (20/52) of the patients diagnosed with DSM-IV borderline personality disorder had been overdiagnosed with bipolar disorder.
Thus, under- and overdiagnosis of bipolar disorder is possible. Recommendations for addressing the underdiagnosis problem include careful clinical evaluations inquiring about a history of mania and hypomania (which might include an interview with informants) and the use of screening questionnaires.1,7,8 Several scales have been developed to screen for bipolar disorder.21-24
Administration of a screening scale is the first stage of a 2-stage diagnostic process. The more expensive and extensive second stage is only conducted when the patient screens positive. Consequently, it is important for a screening scale to have high sensitivity. Clinicians who rely on the screening scale as the first stage of a 2-stage diagnostic assessment, with the second stage being the more in-depth diagnostic interview, will miss the diagnosis in patients who are false negatives on the screening instrument.
A meta-analysis of studies of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ), the most frequently studied screening scale for bipolar disorder, found that the MDQ’s sensitivity was 62% based on the recommended cutoff of 7.25 Thus, more than one-third of true cases of bipolar disorder would be missed if the MDQ was relied upon as the first stage of a 2-stage diagnostic process. In general psychiatric outpatient practices, the positive predictive value of the MDQ (ie, the likelihood of a patient who screens positive having bipolar disorder) is less than 50%.26
Putting aside the performance statistics of bipolar disorder screening scales, the use of these scales can be questioned at a conceptual level. The reason for suggesting the use of these scales is that bipolar disorder is underdiagnosed. But the advocates for the use of screening questionnaires do not indicate how and why a paper-and-pencil questionnaire is expected to help improve diagnostic recognition? Are mental health clinicians often failing to inquire about a history of mania/hypomania in depressed patients, and will only do so when a screening scale is first completed? Do mental health clinicians not know what questions to ask to assess prior manic/hypomanic episodes and therefore these scales are needed because the scales ask the right questions that clinicians do not ask? Do mental health clinicians know what questions to ask, but ignore or discount positive responses from patients and this is the cause of bipolar disorder underdiagnosis?
That is, do the advocates of bipolar disorder screening scales believe that self-report screening questionnaires will improve bipolar disorder recognition because the results of these tests are less easily ignored than the responses of a patient to a clinical interview? Researchers of the performance of bipolar disorder screening scales have not addressed these questions in the Discussion sections of their papers.
The bottom line
I would argue that bipolar disorder screening questionnaires are superfluous. Because bipolar disorder screening scales have modest sensitivity, a clinical interview is necessary to reduce false negatives. Because bipolar disorder screening scales have modest positive predictive value, a clinical interview is necessary to reduce false positives. Thus, a clinical evaluation is always needed regardless of the results of the screening test. Consequently, it is not clear how a screening scale for bipolar disorder would be helpful in a psychiatric setting. The advocates of bipolar disorder screening, who suggest that such scales be routinely used in clinical practice, should indicate how these measures should interface with a clinician’s evaluation. By my reckoning a clinical evaluation is needed regardless of the results of the screening scale; thus, it is unclear what niche these measures should occupy.
Dr Zimmerman is Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University; Director of Outpatient Psychiatry and Partial Hospital Program, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown Medical School. He spoke at Psych Congress in a presentation titled “Does My Patient Have Bipolar Disorder? A Review of Diagnostic Concerns, Conundrums, and Confusion and What to Do About It.” The author reports no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.
1. Bowden CL. Strategies to reduce misdiagnosis of bipolar depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:51-5.
2. Katzow JJ, Hsu DJ, Ghaemi SN. The bipolar spectrum: a clinical perspective. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5:436-42.
3. Manning JS, Haykal RF, Connor PD, Akiskal HS. On the nature of depressive and anxious states in a family practice setting: the high prevalence of bipolar II and related disorders in a cohort followed longitudinally. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38:102-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(97)90089-4.
4. Ghaemi SN, Boiman EE, Goodwin FK. Diagnosing bipolar disorder and the effect of antidepressants: a naturalistic study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:804-808.
5. Ghaemi SN, Ko JY, Goodwin FK. "Cade's disease" and beyond: misdiagnosis, antidepressant use, and a proposed definition for bipolar spectrum disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47:125-34.
6. Hirschfeld RM. Bipolar spectrum disorder: improving its recognition and diagnosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 14:5-9.
7. Hirschfeld RM, Vornik LA. Recognition and diagnosis of bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65 Suppl 15:5-9.
8. Yatham LN. Diagnosis and management of patients with bipolar II disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66 Suppl 1:13-7.
9. Hantouche EG, Akiskal HS, Lancrenon S, et al. Systematic clinical methodology for validating bipolar-II disorder: data in mid-stream from a French national multi-site study (EPIDEP). J Affect Disord. 1998;50:163-73.
10. Perugi G, Akiskal HS, Lattanzi L, et al. The high prevalence of "soft" bipolar (II) features in atypical depression. Compr Psychiatry. 1998;39:63-71.
11. Hirschfeld RM, Lewis L, Vornik LA. Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? Results of the National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:161-74.
12. Lish J, Dime-Meenan S, Whybrow P, et al.The National Depressive and Manic-depression Association (DMDA) survey of bipolar members. J Affect Dis. 1994;31:281-294.
13. Birnbaum HG, Shi L, Dial E, Oster EF, Greenberg PE, Mallett DA. Economic consequences of not recognizing bipolar disorder patients: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:1201-9.
14. Shi L, Thiebaud P, McCombs JS. The impact of unrecognized bipolar disorders for patients treated for depression with antidepressants in the fee-for-services California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program. J Affect Disord. 2004;82:373-83.
15. Matza LS, Rajagopalan KS, Thompson CL, de Lissovoy G. Misdiagnosed patients with bipolar disorder: comorbidities, treatment patterns, and direct treatment costs. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1432-40.
16. Isometsa E, Suominen K, Mantere O, et al. The Mood Disorder Questionniare improves recognition of bipolar disorder in psychiatric care. BMC Psychiatry. 2003;3:4.
17. Stewart C, El-Mallakh RS. Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed among patients with substance abuse? Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(6):646-8.
18. Goldberg J, Garno J, Callahan A, et al. Overdiagnosis of bipolar disorder among substance use disorder inpatients with mood instability. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(11):1751-1757.
19. Zimmerman M, Ruggero CJ, Chelminski I, Young D. Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed? J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69:935-940.
20. Zimmerman M, Ruggero CJ, Chelminski I, Young D. Psychiatric diagnoses in patients previoulsy overdiagnosed with bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:26-31.
21. Angst J, Adolfsson R, Benazzi F, et al. The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients. J Affect Dis. 2005;88:217-33.
22. Hirschfeld R, Williams J, Spitzer R, et al. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1873-1875.
23. Parker G, Fletcher K, Barrett M, et al. Screening for bipolar disorder: the utility and comparative properties of the MSS and MDQ measures. J Affect Disord. 2008;109:83-9.
24. Ghaemi SN, Miller CJ, Berv DA, Klugman J, Rosenquist KJ, Pies RW. Sensitivity and specificity of a new bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale. J Affect Dis. 2005;84:273-277.
25. Wang HR, Woo YS, Ahn HS, Ahn IM, Kim HJ, Bahk WM. The validity of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for screening bipolar disorder: A Meta-Analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32:527-38.
26. Zimmerman M, Galione J. Screening for bipolar disorder with the Mood Disorders Questionnaire: A review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2012;19:219-228.