Sanjiv Kumra, MD

You must keep your own records of this activity. Copy this information and include it in your continuing education file for reporting purposes.



 CME LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

 CME LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.5 

. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

 CME LLC is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider No. CEP12748, and designates this educational activity for 1.5 contact hours for nurses.

 The American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) accepts 

toward recertification requirements.

 The American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accepts 

 from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
  

.
 Original release date 07/09. Approved for CME credit through August 2010.

After reading this article, you will be familiar with:



 • Pathogenesis of early-onset schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (EOSS)
 • Treatment options for children and adolescents with EOSS
 • Benefits versus adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with EOSS



Who will benefit from reading this article?


 Psychiatrists, pediatric psychiatrists, psychologists, primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and other health care professionals. To determine whether this article meets the continuing education requirements of your specialty, please contact your state licensing and certification boards.

Although the onset of psychotic symptoms before the age of 13 years is exceedingly rare, the incidence of schizophrenia rises sharply after the onset of puberty.

 Only 1% of the population has schizophrenia and 30% of these patients experience an onset of psychotic symptoms by age 18 years.

The period that precedes the onset of frank psychotic symptoms (ie, the prodromal phase) has not been well characterized in early-onset schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (EOSS), but retrospective reports have shown that symptoms include high levels of depression and anxiety, emerging cognitive and social deficits, unusual thought content, and (not infrequently) school failure.

In the United States, atypical antipsychotics are often prescribed as first-line treatment for children and adolescents with psychotic symptoms. The atypical antipsychotics have lower affinity for dopamine D

 receptors than the typical antipsychotics, and greater affinity for other neuroreceptors-including those for serotonin and norepinephrine.

 The superior risk to benefit ratio of an atypical antipsychotic is evident in view of the acute and chronic neurological adverse effects, including extrapyramidal syndrome and tardive dyskinesia that have been associated with conventional antipsychotics.

As illustrated in the case vignette, there are few developmental differences between children and adults in the expression of the core symptoms of schizophrenia (ie, disorganization of thought processes and behavior, distortion of reality manifested by hallucinations and delusions, and negative symptoms).

Heidi, 13 years old, was initially seen in our Anxiety Disorder Clinic because of obsessional thoughts with ruminations, high levels of anxiety, and mild depressive symptoms. She was treated with an SSRI at a relatively high dosage without much success. Her symptoms quickly escalated and she became psychotic. She was stabilized with haloperidol, but soon after, she believed she heard the devil telling her to kill herself. The voice was with her constantly.

Haloperidol was gradually cross-tapered with aripiprazole, which was titrated to 30 mg. Akathisia and extrapyramidal symptoms-including dystonias, rigidity, and cogwheeling-developed during aripiprazole therapy. The aripiprazole was stopped and quetiapine was substituted.

Because of the number of her symptoms (eg, suicidal thoughts, obsessionality, anxiety), citalopram was added and titrated to 30 mg/d. Because of the severity of her psychosis, extended-release quetiapine taken orally at bedtime was also added and titrated to 1200 mg. After 4 weeks of treatment, Heidi sufficiently recovered so that she was able to be transitioned to a day hospital program.

After an attempt to decrease the citalopram dosage, Heidi’s depression returned and her obsessions seemed to grow worse. Consequently, the dosage was increased to what it had been. After completing the day hospital program, Heidi returned to school. She has continued to show gradual improvements. She is able to distinguish reality from fantasy and the intensity of her suicidal thoughts has markedly decreased. Because of concerns about weight gain, metformin therapy was initiated and her weight has stabilized.

Early-onset schizophrenia is widely thought to be a disorder of brain development. Psychotic symptoms emerge years after brain systems have deviated from normal developmental trajectories for both gray and white matter. Long-term studies indicate that the outcome for EOSS patients is poor.

 Most youths require long-term antipsychotic treatment. Successful treatment of an acute psychotic episode, particularly the disorganized behavior associated with positive symptoms, is essential for minimizing the compounding effects of deterioration in social and academic functions.

Neurological correlates of early-onset psychosis center on changes within the dopamine system in the prefrontal cortex during mid to late adolescence.

These include decreased density of dopamine cells and peak basal dopamine levels.

 Dopamine turnover and dopaminergic prefrontal cor-tex input are affected.

) receptor concentrations in the striatum (caudate and putamen).

Variations in dopamine metabolism and in noradrenergic and serotonergic regulation during brain development may explain differences in adverse-effect profiles of atypical antipsychotics. These drugs differ in their interactions with the dopamine D

 Children and adolescents who are treated with atypical antipsychotics appear to be more sensitive than adults to adverse effects, including weight gain and metabolic problems associated with these agents.

 Weight and metabolic problems were a notable problem in the most recent study of olanzapine.

 About 46% of adolescents gained an average of 4.3 kg over a 6-month period. Risperidone may cause prolactin elevations and extrapyramidal symptoms have also been seen with aripiprazole.

Recently, there have been placebo-controlled trials of 4 different atypical antipsychotics as well as some head-to-head comparison studies. The placebo-controlled studies included 2 doses of risperidone (1-3 mg and 4-6 mg), 2 doses of aripiprazole (10 mg and 30 mg), 2 doses of quetiapine (400 mg and 800 mg), and a flexible-dose study of olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/d).

A comparison of the general efficacy of these medications is presented in 

. Results of the acute-phase placebo-controlled studies show an equivalent therapeutic effect. The 

summarizes the major clinical take-home points that can be derived from these trials.

Preliminary data demonstrate that the atypical antipsychotic medications may also target the depressive symptoms that children and adolescents with EOSS frequently experience. 

 shows the decrease in Calgary Depression Scores from a 12-week open-label comparison study of risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine.

In the decision to treat children, there is also a major question about metabolic syndrome and weight gain. Perhaps the most well-documented problems with weight gain were observed in the Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS) study.

 In this 8-week study, there were 3 arms: risperidone, olanzapine, and molindone. The children treated with olanzapine gained an average of 6.1 kg and increased their body mass index (BMI) by an average of 2.2 kg/m

. This dramatic weight change prompted the Data Safety Monitoring Board to stop the assignment of additional patients to the olanzapine arm, after an interim analysis.

Similar changes in weight gain were also observed in the placebo-controlled study of olanzapine.

 At the end of week 6, the BMI for olanzapine was up 1.4 kg/m

 and weight had gone up 4.3 kg. Both of these increases were significantly different from those associated with placebo (

Weight gain associated with olanzapine appears to continue beyond the short-term phase of treatment. In a 1-year study, a small cohort of 20 children in the open-label olanzapine group demonstrated some of the major problems with long-term use.

 shows BMI and percentage of study participants who were either overweight or obese.) Before olanzapine treatment, 46% of the 20 children had either elevated BMI or obesity. By the end of the year, all 20 children had either elevated BMI or obesity. Each of the atypical antipsychotics appears to have problems associated with weight change, with the possible exception of aripiprazole. Findling and colleagues

 found that at day 42, patients treated with 400-mg quetiapine had gained 2.2 kg and those treated with 800-mg quetiapine had gained 1.8 kg. These data suggest that weight gain associated with quetiapine treatment is not a dose-related adverse effect. Approximately 20% of the adolescents had a weight increase of more than 7% over baseline.

Weight gain with risperidone therapy has also been noted. After 6 months of taking risperidone, patients gained 4.2 kg on average and BMI had increased by 1.2 kg/m

 Finally, in the aripiprazole treatment group, the weight change from baseline was either unchanged in the 10-mg group or only up 0.2 kg in 6 weeks in the 30-mg group.

There are fewer systematic data available regarding treatment-emergent abnormalities. Increases in levels of triglycerides and lipids, as well as glucose, may predispose patients to metabolic syndrome. Quetiapine was associated with significant elevations in fasting triglycerides in 10% of the study population in a placebo-controlled short-term trial. Adolescents treated with olanzapine had increases in fasting triglycerides, glucose, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; however, these increases were not statistically significant.

Prolactin elevations are a concern for various reasons, including a possible decrease in future fertility.

 Prolactin elevations have been seen in patients treated with risperidone and olanzapine. Results from a 6-month study show that 9% of the patients treated with risperidone had galactorrhea and prolactin-related adverse effects.

 found that compared with baseline, 81% of 72 patients given olanzapine had significantly higher prolactin levels. In contrast, the opposite was seen in patients treated with aripiprazole. Study results showed a mean decrease in prolactin levels of 212 ng/mL in the 10-mg group and 217 ng/mL in the 30-mg group.

 In a study of quetiapine, prolactin levels were decreased in both the active medication and placebo groups.

The side-effect profile for akathisia and extrapyramidal syndrome is another major issue. The degree of akathisia that is experienced can be seen in the TEOSS study, in which benztropine was given prophylactically to the molindone (typical antipsychotic) group. Despite this intervention, scores on the Barnes akathisia scale increased significantly in the molindone group: 18% of the participants experienced moderate to severe akathisia; 39% required additional benztropine (vs 41% for risperidone and 20% for olanzapine).

In the placebo-controlled studies of aripiprazole, the scores on the Simpson Angus Scale (for extrapyramidal symptoms) were statistically significantly higher for groups receiving 10 mg and 30 mg of this agent.

Parkinsonism occurred twice as often in the group treated with 10-mg aripiprazole as in the placebo group and 4 times as often with 30-mg aripiprazole. There were no differences in the incidence of akathisia or in extrapyramidal symptoms in the group treated with olanzapine compared with the placebo group. In the quetiapine studies, somnolence was a major adverse effect. In the group treated with 400-mg quetiapine, fewer than 5% had increased appetite or dry mouth, and in the 800-mg group, fewer than 10% had those symptoms.

A big question is when to use clozapine. Clozapine was found to be superior to haloperidol in treating both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

 Clozapine was also more effective than standard-dose olanzapine (up to 20 mg/d).

 After a medication-free washout phase, both olanzapine and clozapine were effective in treatment-resistant children (ages 7 to 16 years). However, clozapine was superior to olanzapine in reducing negative symptoms when compared with the patients’ admission status when taking their baseline antipsychotic.

Last year a study demonstrated that children with schizophrenia had more success with clozapine than with high-dose olanzapine (up to 30 mg/d): 66% of those treated with clozapine responded favorably compared with 33% of those treated with olanzapine.

 Clozapine, as in the previously mentioned study by Shaw and Rapaport,

 was also found to be more effective in reducing negative symptoms than olanzapine.

However, because of the increased risks with clozapine, 4- to 6-week trials of 2 or 3 of the available atypical antipsychotics at therapeutic doses are needed before a change is made to clozapine. In the haloperidol/clozapine study by Kumra and colleagues,

 treatment was discontinued in approximately one-third of the patients treated with clozapine because of neutropenia or recurrent seizures. Finally, substantial weight gain was seen in recipients of clozapine and olanzapine in acute-phase treatment.

The choice of medication is up to the treating clinician. There are clear advantages to the atypical antipsychotics compared with placebo. The atypical antipsychotics are roughly equivalent in efficacy. However, adverse-effect profiles are markedly different. In the case vignette, for example, severe extrapyramidal symptoms were triggered by 30 mg of aripiprazole, which necessitated a switch to quetiapine.

Adolescent patients with schizophrenia begin to show improvement by the second week of treatment that can be differentiated from improvement seen with placebo. Positive symptoms respond fairly quickly, but dramatic improvements may take a month or more. Improvements in the negative symptoms, cognitive function and anxiety, may take longer than 6 weeks.

In the studies with quetiapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone, improvement was seen more quickly with higher doses than with lower doses in the first several weeks. However, by the end of the 6 weeks, responses to higher and lower doses were approximately equivalent. Using higher doses in an attempt to achieve more rapid results must be balanced against the increased risks of adverse effects. This was especially seen with the aripiprazole study: 10 mg may be the preferable target dose for adolescent patients.

Weight gain and metabolic factors are yet another consideration. Especially for olanzapine and to some extent for risperidone and quetiapine, careful monitoring is needed to prevent weight gain from becoming a significant problem. Preliminary data suggest that metformin may be a safe and effective way of stopping weight gain, increasing insulin sensitivity, and thereby protecting patients, especially patients who are being treated with olanzapine.

 McClellan J, Werry J. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 

 Galdos PM, Van Os JJ, Murray RM. Puberty and the onset of psychosis. 

Articles

Although the onset of psychotic symptoms before the age of 13 years is exceedingly rare, the incidence of schizophrenia rises sharply after the onset of puberty.1 Only 1% of the population has schizophrenia and 30% of these patients experience an onset of psychotic symptoms by age 18 years.2-8 The period that precedes the onset of frank psychotic symptoms (ie, the prodromal phase) has not been well characterized in early-onset schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (EOSS), but retrospective reports have shown that symptoms include high levels of depression and anxiety, emerging cognitive and social deficits, unusual thought content, and (not infrequently) school failure.

Atypical Antipsychotics for Children and Adolescents With Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders

The number of prescriptions for antipsychotic treatment of teenagers has increased sharply in office-based medical practice.

 Adolescents with psychotic symptoms frequently present for clinical evaluation, and early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders (onset of psychotic symptoms before the age of 18 years) represent an important consideration in the differential diagnosis in these youths. The onset of schizophrenia occurs by the age of 19 in nearly 40% of male patients and 23% of female patients.

 Although childhood-onset schizophrenia (onset of psychotic symptoms before age 13) is rare,

 the incidence of schizophrenia rises sharply and steadily after the onset of puberty.

 Since a longer duration of untreated psychosis may be a predictor of poor outcomes in first-episode psychosis, early and appropriate treatment is crucial.

The goals of antipsychotic treatment for psychotic episodes are amelioration of acute symptoms; main- tenance of treatment effect; and functional recovery in terms of academics, peer relations, and family life. Although antipsychotic medications remain the cornerstone of treatment for early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders, most teenagers require multiple treatment strategies to facilitate rehabilitation, including individual supportive therapy, family psychoeducation, and special classroom placement. These interventions help prevent relapse, enhance treatment adherence, and address deficits in social skills. In addition, once acute psychotic symptoms have resolved, comorbid conditions (eg, substance use) must be addressed, as well as other psychosocial factors that contribute to psychiatric morbidity.

The atypical antipsychotics, which differ from typical antipsychotics because of a decrease in associated extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), have now become the standard treatment for youth with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

 For years now, these medications have been given to younger people without specific FDA approval for pediatric populations, and clinicians have provided off-label prescriptions drawing from clinical experience using these medications successfully in adults. However, 3 recently completed double-blind, randomized controlled clin- ical trials reporting the use of risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole for early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders in teenagers have demonstrated effectiveness relative to placebo.

 As a result of these studies, risperidone and aripiprazole now have a formal indication for the treatment of psychotic symptoms in adolescents with schizophrenia. Several important adverse effects are common with the use of atypical antipsychotics including sedation, metabolic abnormalities, elevated prolactin levels, and movement disorders.

This article reviews the available efficacy and safety data for each atypical antipsychotic. A discussion of the considerations involved in choosing an atypical antipsychotic for this population follows (

The first atypical antipsychotic to be approved by the FDA, clozapine is known for its exceptional efficacy and for its considerable associated adverse effects. Although clozapine is not approved for use in pediatric patients, early studies of this medication in youths with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders suggested that it is effective in that group.

 Because it is associated with risks of neutropenia and agranulocytosis, treatment with clozapine is reserved for children and adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

 Two initial open-label trials of clozapine treatment in youths demonstrated efficacy with mean dosages of 370 mg/d

The first randomized controlled trial of clozapine in pediatric patients compared clozapine with haloperidol in adolescent inpatients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

 In this study, initial dosages were based on weight and ranged from 6.25 to 25 mg/d, and were titrated every 3 days by 1 or 2 times the initial dose. The final mean dosage was 176 mg/d. The investigators reported that although clozapine was superior in efficacy to haloperidol, it was associated with adverse effects including neutropenia, which required 1 patient to discontinue the study. Other notable adverse effects observed in patients taking clozapine included hypotension and dizziness, sialorrhea, seizures, and myocarditis.

Risperidone was the first atypical antipsychotic to be released as a first-line agent in the United States and will soon be available in generic form. The most frequently prescribed antipsychotic agent for children and adolescents, risperidone has now been approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents as well as for autistic spectrum disorders in children. After it was introduced in the United States in 1993, early studies using this medication in children and adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders suggested that risperidone is effective in reducing psychotic symptoms in this group but that it is associated with adverse effects including moderate weight gain, mild sedation, and dose-related EPS.

 In the study by Armenteros and colleagues,

 10 adolescents with schizophrenia were treated for 6 weeks beginning with 1 mg bid and increasing by 1 mg to a maximum daily dose of 10 mg. Six of the patients showed significant reduction of symptoms overall, and although adverse motor effects developed in 5 patients, the medication was thought to be generally well-tolerated.

Efficacy of risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents has now been established. Haas and colleagues

 studied 160 adolescents with schizophrenia (aged 13 to 17 years) who were randomized to either 6 weeks of treatment with risperidone (1 to 3 mg/d or 4 to 6 mg/d) or placebo. At the end of the study, improvements in treatment outcomes (eg, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total, positive and negative symptom subscale scores) were significantly greater in both risperidone groups than in those who received placebo, and there were few observed differences in efficacy between the active treatment groups. However, the higher-dose group had a greater incidence of EPS and dizziness than the lower-dose group.

Overall, the findings indicate that risperidone is effective in the treatment of early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adolescents, although it is associated with risks of adverse effects such as movement disorders (possibly at an increased rate compared with adults),

 and significant weight gain. Although prolactin elevation has been repeatedly described for youths treated with risperidone, the available data do not suggest that these changes interfere with development in puberty.

The next atypical antipsychotic introduced in the United States was olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic data for olanzapine use in adolescents suggest that its effect on metabolism is similar to that in adults.

 Initial studies assessing the use of olanzapine in youth focused on treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, a growing body of research, including case series,

has investigated the use of olanzapine as a first-line treatment option for youth with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum dis- orders. The findings suggest that olanzapine is effective in reducing symptoms in adolescents with these disorders and that it is associated with a low incidence of adverse motor effects.

In a recently completed 6-week, randomized placebo-controlled trial of adolescents with schizophrenia (N = 107), Kryzhanovskaya and colleagues

 found olanzapine to be superior to placebo in reducing symptom ratings (ie, overall psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms). In this study, olanzapine was started at 2.5 or 5 mg/d. The titration schedule was flexible, with a final mean dosage of 11.1 mg/d achieved between 4 and 6 weeks. However, patients gained an average of 4.3 kg during this short-term trial, and continued weight gain was observed in patients who enrolled in the 6-month, open-label extension phase. Indeed, among the atypical antipsychotics, olanzapine seems to be associated with a greater risk of weight gain, which limits its practical use. For example, the NIMH Data Safety Monitoring Board stopped enrollment in the olanzapine arm of the Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS) study after an interim analysis revealed alarming levels of weight gain and metabolic changes in children treated with olanzapine.

 Although the findings of a recent study indicated that orally disintegrating olanzapine induces less weight gain in adolescents than standard oral tablets, the weight gain still remained in excess of what was seen for youth treated with risperidone.

After quetiapine received its initial indication from the FDA for treatment of schizophrenia in 1997, several stud- ies assessing its use in pediatric populations have been conducted. Early data suggested that it is a helpful and well-tolerated medication for children and adolescents with a variety of psychiatric disorders.

 In the first open-label study that assessed the use of quetiapine in adolescents with psychotic disorders, McConville and colleagues

 demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in a 23-day trial in which 10 adolescents with psychotic disorders were given quetiapine 25 mg bid, with upward titration to 400 mg bid by day 20. The investigators found the drug to be well-tolerated and reported an average mean weight gain of 1.5 kg. Pharmacokinetic studies were also undertaken and showed that adolescents and adults have similar metabolism of this medication.

In an open-label extension of this trial, patients were treated with a physician's choice flexible dose titration, with ending dosages ranging from 300 to 800 mg/d. The investigators reported a significant decrease in psychotic symptoms, as well as a nonsignificant increase in weight after 6 weeks.

 conducted an open-label, 6-week trial using quetiapine to treat psychotic disorders in children and adolescents with an average final treatment dosage of 467 mg/d. They found the drug to be well-tolerated, with the exception of weight gain of 4.1 kg on average.

Randomized controlled data supporting the use of quetiapine in teenagers with schizophrenia are not yet available. Other adverse effects noted in the use of quetiapine include sedation, hypotension, and dizziness. Studies have suggested that the incidence of treatment-emergent movement disorders in adult patients given a daily dose ranging from 50 to 750 mg does not differ from that seen with placebo.

Ziprasidone was approved for use in the United States in 2001 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults; it now also has an indication for adult bipolar mania. Efficacy and tolerability have been demonstrated in pediatric patients with Tourette syndrome

 but there are few data regarding its use in children and adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and the safety of ziprasidone in children and adolescents have been examined in an open-label study that reported findings that were comparable to those in adults.

 Prompted by concerns about QT prolongation from the adult trials, prospective data have been generated in children and adolescents, which suggested that long-term treatment with low-dose (40 mg) ziprasidone led to prolongation of the QT interval by 28 ± 28 milliseconds.

 Cardiac monitoring according to guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association is advised.

The most recent atypical antipsychotic to become available in the United States is aripiprazole, a high-affinity partial dopamine D

 Large-scale, pivotal trials with aripiprazole for adults with chronic schizophrenia have consistently shown efficacy, with relatively minor adverse effects on body weight, metabolic parameters, prolactin levels, and sedation.

Since aripiprazole is newer in the United States, there are fewer data that assess this drug in young patients. However, one randomized controlled trial has recently been completed, which led to the approval of aripiprazole in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia. Robb and colleagues

 studied 300 adolescents with schizophrenia (aged 13 to 17 years) who were randomized to either 6 weeks of active treatment with fixed dosages of aripiprazole (10 or 30 mg/d) or placebo. More than 85% of patients completed the 6-week study. At the end of the study, both the 10 mg and 30 mg doses showed significant differences from placebo on the PANSS total score and several secondary end points. Across treatment outcome measures, however, efficacy tended to be greater at 30 mg than at 10 mg, with earlier evidence of statistical separation from placebo and numerically greater improvements from baseline.

The majority of spontaneously reported adverse effects were EPS, including akathisia and somnolence, which were rated as either mild or moderate in severity.

 Mean change in weight from baseline was minimal (10 mg, no change; 30 mg, 0.2 kg; placebo, 20.8 kg). Also, a mean decrease in prolactin levels from baseline to end of study was observed in all treatment groups (10 mg, 212 ng/ mL; 30 mg, 217 ng/mL; placebo, 29 ng/mL). These data suggest that the incidence of weight gain and hyperprolactinemia is likely to be minimal in youths receiving aripiprazole.

Clinicians can now begin to draw from emerging data to guide them in the choice of atypical antipsychotics for teenagers with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A recent open-label, randomized comparison between olanzapine (mean dosage, 8.2 mg/d) and risperidone (mean dosage, 1.6 mg/d) in 25 children with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders found that both medications were comparably efficacious in decreasing symptoms, and both were associated with a similar number of adverse effects, the most important being weight gain.

 Olanzapine had a nonsignificantly lower dropout rate. A recent chart review noted increased EPS in risperidone versus olanzapine and quetiapine.

Efficacy and tolerability of risperidone, olanzapine, and haloperidol were compared in youths with psychosis in a randomized controlled comparative trial.

 In this study, all treatments led to a significant reduction of psychotic symptoms. Olanzapine showed the greatest efficacy followed by risperidone and then haloperidol. As expected, the primary adverse effects were sedation, EPS, and weight gain.

The sparsity of controlled trial data on the comparative effectiveness and safety of the atypical antipsychotics in adolescents represents a significant gap in our current knowledge. Only the TEOSS study funded by NIMH has directly compared first-line treatment with risperidone and olanzapine versus a first-generation antipsychotic (molindone) in a large group of adolescents with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

 However, data from this study are still unavailable. In the face of limited comparative efficacy data, the choice of antipsychotics for teenage patients with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders depends largely on consideration of what is known about the adverse effect profile for each medication.

Since a substantial number of patients do not respond to first-line medication, considerable research has been devoted to assessing options for managing patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, defined as failure of 2 or more first-line antipsychotics. These studies have focused on clozapine and olanzapine. An early retrospective study found olanzapine to be an effective substitute for clozapine in adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

; however, in an open-label comparison in a similar population, Kumra and colleagues

 observed that olanzapine was effective but inferior in efficacy to clozapine.

More recently, an open-label study found olanzapine to cause sustained improvement over 1 year in 8 of 9 children with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

 Two double-blind, randomized trials that compared clozapine with olanzapine for youths with treatment-resistant schizophrenia have now been published. In the first, Shaw and colleagues

 reported that clozapine (mean final dosage, 327 mg/d) was significantly superior in efficacy to olanzapine (mean final dosage, 19.1 mg/d) after 8 weeks, although olanzapine was associated with fewer adverse effects. A recent 12-week, randomized, double-blind comparison between clozapine and high-dose olanzapine in refractory early-onset schizophrenia showed that clozapine (mean final dosage, 403.1 mg/d) was superior to olanzapine (mean final dosage, 26.2 mg/d) in reducing psychosis and negative symptoms, but both medications were associated with significant weight gain and related metabolic abnormalities.

 These findings suggest that clozapine remains the agent of choice in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, despite its significant risks.

In the treatment of adolescents, it is important to consider potential developmental differences of this group that may impact course and treatment response. Compared with adult-onset schizophrenia, naturalistic data suggest that the course of illness is more severe in early-onset illness.

 Study findings have suggested that youth treated with antipsychotic medications may be more sensitive to EPS.

 In addition, olanzapine may be more sedating in children and adolescents compared with adults.

 In light of recent data that suggest that risperidone may have adverse effects on spatial working memory in adults with first-episode schizophrenia, the long-term safety of atypical antipsychotics on the developing brain needs to be clarified.

A growing body of research assessing the use of atypical antipsychotics in adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders suggests that medications are effective in reducing symptoms and improving function. Although these medications are associated with a lower incidence of adverse motor effects compared with typical antipsychotics, the atypical antipsychotics are associated with a number of important adverse effects including sedation and metabolic abnormalities. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests that because of developmental differences, adolescents may be especially vulnerable to a whole range of adverse effects. While a limited data set is available that suggests some differences between atypical antipsychotics in terms of their adverse-effect profiles, additional comparative studies of the efficacy and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics are needed to inform the clinician's choice of initial antipsychotic.

Of the adverse effects associated with atypical antipsychotics, metabolic effects may be the most significant problem. Weight gain is of primary importance for teenagers: it contributes to subjective distress and nonadherence and has long-term medical consequences.

 The atypical antipsychotics share a class warning for hyperglycemia and, thus, symptoms of diabetes and fasting blood sugars need to be monitored.

Given that patients with schizophrenia are approximately twice as likely as the general population to die of cardiovascular disease,

 and that most of them will require long-term therapy, their physical health must be safeguarded. At the same time, because longer duration of untreated psychosis may predict poorer long-term outcomes in first-episode psychosis, physicians are compelled to treat early and aggressively to improve outcomes for their young patients with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Fortunately, considerable research has been devoted in recent years to begin to characterize the mechanism of these problems, which will hopefully guide interventions to decrease adverse effects. A recent study by Klein and colleagues

 demonstrated reduced weight gain in adolescents treated with olanzapine while taking metformin, but further research is needed to guide clinicians in managing these difficulties.

In conjunction with medication management of youths with early- onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders, it is important to keep in mind the social contextual issues that commonly occur in this population. There is often confusion and fear in the family regarding the nature of the illness and presenting symptoms that may delay treatment seeking. Shock and denial regarding the diagnosis commonly emerge during the early treatment phase. Since treatment noncompliance or discontinuation is a significant concern, early psychoeducation and support is crucial.

In addition, since response to currently available treatments remains suboptimal for many teenagers with schizophrenia, it is important to examine whether the use of adjunctive psychosocial treatments improves outcome.

 Olfson M, Blanco C, Liu L, et al. National trends in the outpatient treatment of children and adolescents with antipsychotic drugs. 

 Loranger AW. Sex differences in age at onset of schizophrenia. 

 McClellan J, Werry J. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. 

 Hafner H, an der Heiden W. Epidemiology of schizophrenia. 

 Perkins DO, Gu H, Boteva K, Lieberman JA. Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis. 

Juvenile-Onset Schizophrenia. Assessment, Neurobiology, and Treatment. 

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005.


 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Practice parameter for assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. 

 Haas M, Unis A, Copenhaver M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risperidone in adolescents with schizophrenia. Presented at: the 160th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; May 19-24, 2007; San Diego.


 Kryzhanovskaya LA, Schulz S, McDougle C, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine in adolescents with schizophrenia. Presented at: the 159th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; May 20-25, 2006; Toronto.


 Robb A, Findling R, Nyilas M, et al. Efficacy of aripiprazole in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia. Poster presented at: the 160th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; May 19-24, 2007; San Diego.


 Birmaher B, Baker R, Kapur S, et al. Clozapine for the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia. 

 Levkovitch Y, Kaysar N, Kronnenberg Y, et al. Clozapine for schizophrenia. 

 Findling RL, Frazier JA, Gerbino-Rosen G, et al. Is there a role for clozapine in the treatment of children and adolescents? 

 Frazier JA, Gordon CT, McKenna K, et al. An open trial of clozapine in 11 adolescents with childhood- onset schizophrenia. 

 Jacobsen LK, Hommer DW, Hong WL, et al. Blink rate in childhood-onset schizophrenia: comparison with normal and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder controls. 

 Kumra S, Frazier JA, Jacobsen LK, et al. Childhood-onset schizophrenia: a double-blind clozapine-haloperidol comparison. 

 Armenteros J, Whitaker A, Welikson M, et al. Risperidone in adolescents with schizophrenia: an open pilot study. 

 Cozza SJ, Edison DL. Risperidone in adolescents. 

 Grcevich S, Findling R, Rowane W, et al. Risperidone in the treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia: a retrospective study. 

 Mandoki MW. Risperidone treatment of children and adolescents: increased risk of extrapyramidal side-effects? 

 Saito E, Correll CU, Gallelli K, et al. A prospective study of hyperprolactinemia in children and adolescents treated with atypical antipsychotic agents. 

 Dunbar F, Kusumakar V, Daneman D, Schulz M. Growth and sexual maturation during long-term treatment with risperidone. 

 Grothe DR, Calis KA, Jacobsen L, et al. Olanza- pine pharmacokinetics in pediatric and adolescent inpatients with childhood-onset schizophrenia. 

 Haapasalo-Pesu KM, Saarijarvi S. Olanzapine induces remarkable weight gain in adolescent patients. 

 Maagensen MA, T. Treatment of adolescent psychosis with olanzapine: a preliminary report. 

 Dittman RH, Maestele A, Mehler C, et al. Olanzapine in a phase 3 trial with adolescent schizophrenic patients: first results on drug safety. Presented at: the 48th Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; October 23-28, 2001; Honolulu.


 McClellan J, Sikich L, Findling RL, et al. Treatment of early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders (TEOSS): rationale, design, and methods. 

The number of prescriptions for antipsychotic treatment of teenagers has increased sharply in office-based medical practice. Adolescents with psychotic symptoms frequently present for clinical evaluation, and early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders (onset of psychotic symptoms before the age of 18 years) represent an important consideration in the differential diagnosis in these youths

Author | Sanjiv Kumra, MD

Articles

Atypical Antipsychotics for Children and Adolescents With Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders

Atypical Antipsychotics for Treatment of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders