
Value of Methylphenidate for ADHD Called Into Question
How strong is the foundation of current pharmacotherapy recommendations for ADHD?
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"50360","attributes":{"alt":"ADHD","class":"media-image media-image-right","height":"215","id":"media_crop_6933852096090","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"6147","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"float: right;","title":"©QuangHo/Shutterstock","typeof":"foaf:Image","width":"200"}}]]RESEARCH UPDATE
A wealth of guidelines, including those from the
The synopsis summarizes a
There was no evidence that methylphenidate was associated with an increase in serious adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 - 2.22; based on 9 trials that included 1532 participants, with the caveat that the findings lacked statistical power because of the paucity of studies that examined this association).
There was no evidence that methylphenidate was associated with an increase in serious adverse events, but questions remain.
As for nonserious AEs, the risk was 29% higher in patients who received methylphenidate than in controls (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10 - 1.51; based on 21 trials that included 3132 participants). The most frequent nonserious AEs were sleep problems and decreased appetite.
Here’s the rub. The meta-analysis used Trial Sequential Analyses to control for type I and II errors and assessed and downgraded evidence for high risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness, heterogeneity, and publication bias according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. It was found that all 185 trials included in the meta-analysis were at high risk for bias and that evidence was generally weak.
“The results of the meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate may improve teacher-reported ADHD symptoms, teacher-reported general behaviour, and parent-reported quality of life among children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD.
However, the low quality of the underpinning evidence means that we cannot be certain of the magnitude of the effects,”4 the authors of the
The authors of the
They reiterated that conclusions regarding safety lacked statistical power. They also disclosed that the median duration of pharmacotherapy in the trials included in the meta-analysis was less than 2 months; few trials had a treatment duration that exceeded 6 months.
“The findings from our review suggest that the recommendations in [the] guidelines should be reevaluated,”3 the authors concluded. They again called for randomized active-placebo (nocebo)–controlled clinical trials, which they suggested should first be conducted in adults rather than in children for ethical reasons. They also stressed the importance of conducting trials with longer follow-up.
References:
1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management.
2. Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, et al.
3. Storebø OJ, Simonsen E, Gluud C.
4. Storebø OJ, Ramstad E, Krogh HB, et al.
Newsletter
Receive trusted psychiatric news, expert analysis, and clinical insights — subscribe today to support your practice and your patients.