
The Year in Bipolar: 7 Practice-Changing Papers From 2017
Among the topics covered in this year's noteworthy studies: lithium and suicide prevention, mixed depression, and light therapy.
1. Confirmed: Lithium prevents suicide
What it showed
Lithium can prevent 12% of suicides in patients with bipolar disorder.[1]
How it adds to our knowledge
The suicide rate is elevated 10-fold in patients with recurrent mood disorders, and epidemiologic studies suggest that lithium lowers that risk to a level comparable to that in the general population (Figure).[2] What those studies have lacked is a controlled design, but controlled trials are usually underpowered to detect rare events like suicide. This
How it changes practice:
Concerns about overdose on lithium often limit its use in suicidal and impulsive patients, but that practice does not remove the means of suicide and instead may rob those patients of a treatment that can prevent those dangerous impulses. Lithium can prevent suicide even when it does not improve mood, and it should be considered for all bipolar and unipolar patients with elevated risks of suicide.[2] Abrupt discontinuation of lithium can significantly raise the suicide risk, so the medicine should be tapered slowly over several months.[1]
2. Nearly a quarter of depressed patients convert to bipolar disorder
What it showed
22% of patients with a diagnosis of major depression develop bipolar disorder over a follow-up of 12-18 years, and most of those conversions occur within the first 5 years of diagnosis.[3]
How it adds to our knowledge
By pooling data from 56 studies,
How it changes practice
Screening for bipolar disorder should be ongoing and take into account symptoms as well as non-symptomatic markers of the illness. Tools like the
3. Manic symptoms during unipolar depression are more common than thought
What it showed
Depressions with at least 3 manic symptoms are common in both unipolar (24%) and bipolar (35%) depressions.[4]
How it adds to our knowledge
Though long recognized as part of the bipolar spectrum, mixed features are a new concept in DSM-5.
Recognizing mixed depression can help identify patients who are at risk for worsening on antidepressants and for conversion to bipolar disorder. A new
a DSM-5 takes a more conservative approach to mixed features than the studies in this paper (it does not allow irritability, distractibility, or psychomotor agitation to count toward the diagnosis).
4. Psychotherapy for bipolar disorder: Bring the family in
What it showed
Psychotherapy for bipolar disorder is more effective at reducing relapses when family or other caregivers are included in the work.[6]
How it adds to our knowledge
By using network meta-analysis, which allows for comparisons between more than 2 treatments,
How it changes practice
Family members are often marginalized in psychiatric treatment, and that may be to the detriment of patients with bipolar disorder. Basic steps in family therapy can be integrated into most treatment sessions and include psychoeducation,
5. A calculator for the bipolar prodrome
What it showed
An
How it adds to our knowledge
Recent studies suggest that early intervention in youth at risk for bipolar disorder can prevent progression to the full illness. That work depends on accurately identifying the bipolar prodrome, and this study adds precision to that concept. Both mood and non-mood symptoms were equally predictive of progression to bipolar disorder, and the overall severity of the presentation was more predictive than the type of symptoms.
How it changes practice
We are used to making diagnoses based on a cross-sectional view of the current symptoms, but
6. Light therapy treats bipolar depression
What it showed
How it adds to our knowledge
Although light therapy is well established for unipolar depression, studies in bipolar disorder have been lacking and concerns about inducing hypo/mania have hindered its use. These 2 studies provide reassurance: neither saw an increased rate of hypo/mania with light therapy.
How it changes practice
These studies move
7. Good news for lithium in the elderly
What it showed
Lithium slightly outperformed valproate in a
How it adds to our knowledge
Lithium’s use in the elderly has been limited by concerns about tolerability and the risk of renal disease. This new clinical trial reassures us about its tolerability in those over age 60: adverse effects were similar for lithium and valproate. The study was limited by a high rate of attrition, but that rate was similar for both treatments. The finding that lithium’s efficacy was superior to that of valproate surprised the researchers, who had hypothesized the opposite.
The second study also holds a few surprises, which need to be interpreted with caution as it is observational data. Patients with kidney disease who stopped lithium had worse renal outcomes than those who stayed on it, even after attempting to control for confounding variables. In contrast, continuing an anticonvulsant did not confer an advantage in renal outcomes, a result that builds on
How it changes practice
Lithium’s long-term efficacy and overall tolerability have made it a preferred choice for youth[15] and adults[16] with bipolar disorder. These new studies extend those advantages into the later years of the illness. Kidney disease is not an absolute contraindication to continuation of lithium, and renal outcomes may fare better for those who continue lithium than those who come off the medicine. Renal risks can be further reduced by giving the entire dose at night, aiming for the lowest effective serum level, and monitoring kidney function more frequently.
Disclosures:
About the author
Dr. Aiken is the Director of the Mood Treatment Center and an Instructor in Clinical Psychiatry at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine. He does not accept honoraria from pharmaceutical companies but receives honoraria from W.W. Norton & Co. for
References:
1. Song J, Sjölander A, Joas E, et al.
2. Tondo L, Baldessarini RJ.
3. Ratheesh A, Davey C, Hetrick S, et al.
4. Vázquez GH, Lolich M, Cabrera C, et al.
5. Stahl SM, Morrissette DA, Faedda G, et al.
6. Chatterton ML, Stockings E, Berk M, et al.
7. Hafeman DM, Merranko J, Goldstein TR, et al.
8. Schneck CD, Chang KD, Singh MK, et al.
9. Fristad MA, Young AS, Vesco AT, et al.
10. Sit DK, McGowan J, Wiltrout C, et al.
11. Zhou TH, Dang WM1, Ma YT, et al.
12. Young RC, Mulsant BH, Sajatovic M, et al.
13. Kessing LV, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Andersen PK, et al.
14. Kessing LV, Gerds TA, Feldt-Rasmussen B, et al.
15. Kessing LV, Vradi E, Andersen PK.
16. Sani G, Perugi G, Tondo L.
Newsletter
Receive trusted psychiatric news, expert analysis, and clinical insights — subscribe today to support your practice and your patients.