Nidal Moukaddam, MD, PhD

Starting as a mysterious pneumonia in Wuhan, China, the newly named COVID-19 has resulted in a worldwide outbreak, causing morbidity and mortality as well as potentially disrupting the global economy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared this a global pandemic; to date (as this article goes to press), there are more than 80,000 reported cases worldwide (72,506 from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau), and COVID-19 has claimed more than 2700 lives. (For more information, please see 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/ 2019-ncov/summary.html

Although pharmaceutical companies and countries are looking into vaccinations and curative treatment for coronavirus infection, currently there is nothing available; thus, precautions against transmission and early supportive treatment is key. Psychiatrists must have a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of coronaviruses in order to be able to accurately explain and discuss those issues with their patients, especially as mental health ramifications are expected.

Coronaviruses, belonging to the Coronaviridae family, are singleâstranded positiveâsense ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses that thrive in animals, which are their natural carriers. The only coronaviruses previously known to infect humans were HCoVâ229E, HCoVâOC43, HCoVâNL63, andHKU1, as well as the two infamous relatives of 2019-nCoV-the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), responsible for outbreaks in 2002-2003 and 2012, respectively. Alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses infect mammals (eg, bats) whereas gammacoronaviruses and deltacoronaviruses are more prone to cause fish and bird infections (Table). Animal to human-zoonotic-transmission is not the norm for coronaviruses, but prior coronavirus outbreaks in animals have been economically damaging.

have been occurring of late. However, it is hypothesized that global climate factors may be related and similar to viral mutations linked to pandemic capacity (ie, genetic drifts in a wide outbreak in animals may essentially lead to better virus survival rates in humans).

In the case of COVID-19, the transmission is 

to have occurred at the Wuhan Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, although the exact carrier species has not been determined.

 From this point, the main 2019-nCoV contagion has been human-to-human transmission. Symptoms have ranged from mild to severe, with most patients reporting fever, dry cough, myalgia, fatigue, and diarrhea.

 Gastrointestinal symptoms have been present, although less frequent than with SARS.

Why do some people get sicker than others? Coronaviruses have an RNA genome, similar to the influenza virus (responsible for the flu) or the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The immune system recognizes the RNA as foreign and triggers the immune response responsible for fighting the virus (ie, production of interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines), and then clearing the foreign entity out of the body. A review of the exact immune responses are beyond the scope of this manuscript. However, the reader is encouraged to remember that the immune system is highly adaptable and modifies its metabolism and existing balance to fight expected threats (for an excellent review, see Kikkert

). Unfortunately, the virus exploits the host’s immune system, mimicking certain innate components to hide while replicating, which makes the immune system less able to effectively fight the invasion. Viruses may also halt cellular replication and use existing cellular resources to prioritize viral replication. The balance between immune response and viral replicative success ultimately determines disease outcome.

Certain populations are known to be vulnerable to COVID-19, such as infants, the elderly, and those with immunocompromised systems or pre-existing medical issues, who are at increased risk for severe repercussions from infections and, thus, more likely to develop sepsis and possibly death; worse outcomes could also be 

 Cytokine storm, a term referring to over-production of inflammatory cytokines, was found more often in patients suffering from COVID-19 who ended up in intensive care, but causal factors are not fully understood.

 Thus far, there is no way to predict who will have an exaggerated immune response besides looking for the previously noted clinical, non-specific factors.

Prevention, treatment, mental health implications >

Cleaning and disinfection to prevent transmission

Concern arises about transmission between various individuals but also about persistence of the virus on inanimate surfaces, such as mailed packages or in health care settings. As such, WHO has provided a set of recommendations for disinfecting surfaces.9 While the persistence of 2012-nCoV is not fully understood, it has been shown that other strains of coronaviruses stay viable for up to 9 days on surfaces (unless disinfected).

Testing of the recommend WHO formulations against various viruses revealed effectiveness.10 Ethanol, sodium hypochlorite, and glutardialdehyde have been found most effective;

 a concentration of 70% ethanol is adequate for small surface disinfection. Patients inquiring about cleaning should be cautioned about using gloves with bleach (sodium hypochlorite) and other substances. Special attention should be paid to patients with cleaning compulsions, who get skin damage from excessive cleaning product exposure. (The worsening of obsessive-compulsive disorder is discussed in the accompanying article.)

The CDC recommended precautions include the use of a facemask for suspected patients/affected individuals (not for healthy individuals) and hand washing with soap and water for 20 seconds or using any sanitizers with at least 60% alcohol content. This especially should be done after using the restroom; after blowing one’s nose, coughing, sneezing; and before and after eating.

Although the coronavirus may have infected thousands of people, it is important to put its impact into perspective. For instance, according to the CDC, influenza already has affected 19 million people this year alone, hospitalizing 180,000 and killing 10,000 individuals. Thus, although COVID-19 is a serious threat, flu continues to be the major viral respiratory threat, as it has for many decades. Prevention efforts should focus on the flu and highly prevalent infections while also keeping in mind novel outbreaks.

Testing, treatment, and prevention efforts

The presence of COVID-19 can be assessed by a newly released real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test. Of course, here in the US, clinicians are encouraged to contact and collaborate with their state or local health department for any diagnosed or suspected cases.

While there is no specific treatment for COVID-19, WHO has issued an interim guidance document, which is available online at www.who.int/. Meanwhile, there have been treatment attempts with various antivirals (eg, remdesivir, lopinavir-ritonavir, interferon-Î± 2b) developed for previously known viral agents. None of these have been studied in randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 and results are of anecdotal quality.

for patients requiring hospitalization is isolation and supportive care, including oxygen therapy and fluid management.

 Administration of antimicrobials for treatment of secondary bacterial infections and avoiding secondary end-organ damage also may be needed for some patients.

 Care must be taken to discourage patients from seeking untested, potentially dangerous treatments such as over-the-counter concoctions.

Without specific treatments, the emphasis has been on limiting new exposures, which is where incubation and quarantines come into play. Currently, the incubation period is thought to be 2 to 14 days, so limiting exposure to individuals with suspected infection during that time, and within the active symptom period, is the first and most basic step in preventing further spread of the virus.

The working incubation period takes a few things into consideration. In a systematic review of nine viral agents of public health importance, 

 found most coronaviruses had a median incubation time of 3 to 4 days. Among affected individuals from China, the mean incubation period has been about 5 days, with a range of 4 to 7 days and a 95% percentile of 12.5 days

; thus, the typically imposed 14 - day incubation period. Athough some anectodal reports suggest a longer incubation, the CDC believes data show 14 days is the top amount needed.

The coronavirus has largely dominated the news and the minds of people across the globe for the last month. In the 

, we discuss its impact on mental illnesses, stigma, and discrimination in our communities: 

Psychiatrists Beware! The Impact of COVID-19 and Pandemics on Mental Health

is Associate Professor, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub Adult Outpatient Services Director, Medical Director, STAR (Stabilization, Treatment, and Rehabilitation) Program for Psychosis, Houston, TX. 

is Professor & Executive Vice Chair, Barbara & Corbin J. Robertson Jr. Chair in Psychiatry at Menninger, Chief of the Division of Community Psychiatry at Baylor College of Medicine. They report no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.

Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases

2. Goneau LW, Mehta K, Wong J, L’Huillier AG, Gubbay JB. Zoonotic Influenza and Human Health-Part 1: Virology and Epidemiology of Zoonotic Influenzas. 

Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia

4. Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, et al. Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 2020.

The Novel Coronavirus: A Bird’s Eye View

Innate Immune Evasion by Human Respiratory RNA Viruses

7. Chousterman BG, Swirski FK, Weber GF. 

Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis

8. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. 

9. WHO. Use of disinfectants: alcohol and bleach. Infection prevention and control of epidemic-and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care. Geneva: WHO;2014.

10. Siddharta A, Pfaender S, Vielle NJ, et al. Virucidal Activity of World Health Organization-Recommended Formulations Against Enveloped Viruses, Including Zika, Ebola, and Emerging Coronaviruses. 

11. Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and its inactivation with biocidal agents. 

12. Lessler J, Reich NG, Brookmeyer R, Perl TM, Nelson KE, Cummings DA. Incubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: a systematic review. 

13. Serrano I, Gomes D, Ramilo D, et al. An Overview of Zoonotic Disease Outbreaks and its Forensic Management Over Time. 

Articles

Psychiatrists must have a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of coronaviruses in order to be able to accurately explain and discuss those issues with their patients, especially as mental health ramifications are expected.

The New Game of Microbiology Clue: The Who, When, Where, and Why of the Novel Coronavirus

It’s easy to blame, it’s easy to politicize, it’s harder to tackle a problem together and find solutions together.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, PhD, MSc

Infectious pandemics and the spread of organisms across countries and continents have been facilitated by global changes in earth’s climate and an increase in travel and international exchange. COVID-19, the infection caused by the novel coronavirus detected in December 2019, is now affecting more than 27 countries, raising concerns of widespread panic and increasing anxiety in individuals subjected to the (real or perceived) threat of the virus. Importantly, these concerns arise with all infections, including the flu and other agents, and the same universal precautions are needed and indicated for safety and the prevention of further transmission. However, media coverage has highlighted COVID-19 as a unique threat, rather than one of many, which has added to panic, stress, and the potential for hysteria.

Pandemics are not just a medical phenomenon; they affect individuals and society on many levels, causing disruptions. Stigma and xenophobia are two aspects of the societal impact of pandemic infectious outbreaks. Panic and stress have also been linked to outbreaks. As concerns over the perceived threat grow, people may start to collect (and hoard) masks and other medical supplies. This is often followed by anxiety-related behaviors, sleep disturbances, and overall lower perceived state of health. Individuals with mental illness may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of widespread panic and threat.

Fears, Outbreaks, and Pandemics: Lessons Learned

Chronic disease, including chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and 

 (HIV), are associated with higher levels of mental disorders as compared with the general population.

 Studies show depression rates usually soar after infections (eg, herpes exposure and anthrax scares).

 Although the effects of the coronavirus on mental health have not been systematically studied, it is anticipated that COVID-19 will have rippling effects, especially based on current public reactions. Psychiatrists are uniquely situated to help both their patients and the greater community understand the potential impact of the virus and help patients, families, and society deal with this latest threat.

Stigma, medical mistrust, and conspiracies

Epidemics lead to stigmatization of affected individuals, authority figures, and health care professionals; sadly, this trend has been seen in multiple countries and with multiple infectious agents.

 With COVID-19, men and women of Asian descent, specifically Chinese, are the victims of social stigma and xenophobia, with high levels of politicization and threats online and in personal interactions. As with most stigma-laden interactions, the process unfolds because of limited information, hasty and uni-dimensional assessments, and a defensive formulaic response. It is imperative that all health care professionals, especially psychiatrists, act as the voice of reason and help disseminate proper, evidence-based information.

“Medical mistrust” refers to a lack of trust in medical treatment and advances. It results in a lower use of health care resources and poorer management of health conditions (coupled with potential misuse at times of crisis). Moreover, medical mistrust has been used to explain some racial and ethnic health care disparities.

 It has been linked to a variety of diseases and conditions, including cancer, autism, and HIV.

During infectious pandemic,s medical mistrust has been linked to conspiracy theories. In one US study, up to half of those surveyed endorsed belief in at least one health-related conspiracy theory.

 At its extreme, medical mistrust can lead to movements such as anti-vaccination trends, which have been linked to measles outbreaks.

Mistrust of medical organizations can reinforce stigma and perceived discrimination and result in lower adherence to health recommendations. Clinicians must maintain a scientific, fact-based, and neutral presentation of recommendations while emphasizing the importance of overall infection control practices in the wake of COVID-19.

Anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders

We anticipate the effects of infectious disease threats to manifest as sheer anxiety and panic: worry about getting an infection, worry about loved ones getting ill, and worry when related symptoms-even minor-are present. The absence of a definitive treatment for coronavirus easily exacerbates anxiety. In most cases, these anxiety symptoms do not reach diagnostic thresholds for a DSM-5 diagnosis; however, patients will benefit from reassurance and education.

Contamination obsessions-unwanted, intrusive worry that one is dirty and in need of washing, cleaning, or sterilizing-are very common in patients with OCD. Perceptual experiences (eg, feeling dirt on skin) understandably would amplify obsessions. Sensory experiences (but not necessarily full tactile hallucinations) have been found in up to 75 % of patients with OCD patients.

 More intense sensory experiences (pseudo-hallucinations) are related to worsened control over compulsions and poorer insight.

 Biased information processing is associated with a tendency to overestimate threat in individuals with OCD.

 This may increase sensitivity to the panic associated with 

 and further destabilize patients and increase functional impairment.

Cleaning and washing compulsions, also a core feature of OCD, can easily be exacerbated by the threat of infectious pandemics. Complications of excessive cleaning include dry, chapped skin (which can lead to super-imposed infections). and contact and atopic dermatitis; similarly, overuse of toxic cleaning supplies can lead to inhalational injuries.

 Fear of acquiring a new, sensationalized disease may worsen negative behaviors. Clinicians in psychiatry, psycho-dermatology, and primary care practices should be alert to potential issues in patients with OCD.

Psychotic disorders: an extreme of medical mistrust?

Anecdotally, the most glaring (and maybe the most interesting) examples of medical mistrust conspiracy theories concern patients who have psychotic disorders. Typically, repeated media exposure to an alarming fact (in this case, spread of coronavirus), coupled with a distrust of organizations and government as well as misattribution of physical symptoms can result in delusions. Similarly, fears can quickly lead to clinical decompensation and must be carefully monitored.

Adding fuel to the fire are discussions of conspiracy theories related to infectious outbreaks such as HIV and Ebola in the 

 The lack of knowledge about epidemics, the increase of zoonotic infections, and the fairly complex effects of climate changes can affect patients as well as confuse even an overall healthy person.

At the intersection of psychosis and obsessiveness is delusional parasitosis, also referred to as monosymptomatic hypochondrial psychosis, Ekbom syndrome, and delusional infestation. Essentially, the patient believes that he is infected with an organism that evades detection and treatment and, thus, causes continuous suffering. This syndrome was described as early as 1636 by sir Thomas Browne, who referred to it as 

A concerning clinical feature of delusional infestation is its occurrence in multiple family members (eg, folie a deux).

Delusional infestation development in the context of pandemics has not been studied. Conceivably, increased cases may develop as more individuals focus on far-fetched, unlikely infections because of easy access to unverified information on the internet. To address delusional parasitosis, clinicians should rule out organic causes and reassure the patient that there is no infection or infestation.

The current COVID-19 outbreak is spurring fear on a societal level. On an individual level, it may differentially exacerbate anxiety and psychosis-like symptoms as well as lead to non-specific mental issues (eg, mood problems, sleep issues, phobia-like behaviors, panic-like symptoms). We urge our colleagues to spread sound infection control practices and help their communities maintain civil, courteous, and rational communication. A low index of suspicion of mental distress can help in early detection and treatment and spare patients much suffering.

 is Associate Professor, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub Adult Outpatient Services Director, Medical Director, STAR (Stabilization, Treatment, and Rehabilitation) Program for Psychosis, Houston, TX. 

 is Professor & Executive Vice Chair, Barbara & Corbin J. Robertson Jr. Chair in Psychiatry at Menninger, Chief of the Division of Community Psychiatry at Baylor College of Medicine. They report no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.

1. van den Heuvel L, Chishinga N, Kinyanda E, et al. 

Frequency and correlates of anxiety and mood disorders among TB- and HIV-infected Zambians

2. Kuan V, Denaxas S, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, et al. A chronological map of 308 physical and mental health conditions from 4 million individuals in the English National Health Service. 

3. Gale SD, Berrett AN, Erickson LD, et al. Association between virus exposure and depression in US adults. 

4. Mason BW, Lyons RA. Acute psychological effects of suspected bioterrorism. 

5. Shigemura J, Ursano RJ, Morganstein JC, et al. Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: mental health consequences and target populations. 

6. Jaiswal J, Halkitis PN. Towards a more inclusive and dynamic understanding of medical mistrust informed by science. Behav Med. 2019;45:79-85.

7. Oliver JE, Wood T. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. 

8. Gaillat J. Vaccine hesitancy: how to lift the brake? [in French]. 

9. Moritz S, Purdon C, Jelinek L, et al. If it is absurd, then why do you do it? The richer the obsessional experience, the more compelling the compulsion. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018;25:210-216.

10. Ferrao YA, Shavitt RG, Prado H, et al. Sensory phenomena associated with repetitive behaviors in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an exploratory study of 1001 patients. 

11. Exner C, Zetsche U, Lincoln TM, Rief W. Imminent danger? Probabilistic classification learning of threat-related information in obsessive-compulsive disorder. 

12. Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Self-induced dermatoses: A great imitator. 

13. Gieler U, Consoli SG, Tomas-Aragones L, et al. Self-inflicted lesions in dermatology: terminology and classification--a position paper from the European Society for Dermatology and Psychiatry (ESDaP). 

14. Kamara S, Walder A, Duncan J, et al. Mental health care during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Sierra Leone. 

Rumors and realities:m sense of HIV/AIDS conspiracy narratives and contemporary legends

16. Jeppsson A. How East Germany fabricated the myth of HIV being man-made. 

17. Kellett C. Sir Thomas Browne and the disease called the Morgellons. 

18. Dowben JS, Kowalski PC, Keltner NL. Formication, tactile hallucinations, delusional parasitosis, and Morgellons: Enough to make your skin crawl. 

Psychiatrists are uniquely situated to help both their patients and the greater community understand the potential impact of the virus and help patients, families, and society deal with this latest threat.

Outbreaks can affect mental illness at various levels.

New onset symptoms: adjustment/depression/anxiety versus well defined post-infectious manifestations (SSPE, PANDAS)

Worsening of existing conditions:  Exacerbation of existing mood, psychotic or addictive disorders.

Effect on caretakers and friends/family: Depression/anxiety versus stigma, shaming

Poll

Can outbreaks such as COVID-19 affect existing illnesses and precipitate new-onset psychiatric symptoms in children and adults?

Mini Quiz: Coronavirus Outbreak and Mental Illness

Slideshows

Psychiatrists are likely to encounter patients with depression, anxiety, and paranoia related to communicable diseases and pandemics. Following is a summary of memorable epidemics/pandemics.

Psychiatric Sequelae of Pandemics

The influenza virus itself was not selective in its victims, belying notions of gender, class, and racial superiority. . . . Anyone might become ill, anyone might provide comfort.

Infectious outbreaks have shaped the psyche of humanity for times immemorial. Epidemics and pandemics propagate fear and erratic behavior and, long after they are over, remain entrenched within the global psyche, often in the form of folk tale and literary or historical accounts. Naturally, logically, and unsurprisingly, the larger the scale of an outbreak, the larger the impact and magnitude of its sequelae. The black plague pandemic, starting in 1345, claimed up to 100 million lives and is still the topic of lively speculation and research to this day; the influenza pandemic of 1918 still receives attention. The 

summarizes major historical outbreaks, with estimated lives affected.

In recent years, media attention has shaped outbreak coverage in various ways, heightening alarm while serving as a useful tool for encouraging precautions and prevention. However, pandemic spread of infectious diseases has also been a cause of concern because of increased air travel and an overall increase in global connectedness. Smaller outbreaks receive much media coverage as infectious diseases thought to be eradicated resurface, but also in highlight of crowded or unsanitary conditions. Outbreaks of mumps, measles, and polio have been noted in various communities (such as jails, detention centers, daycare centers). Large numbers of refugees, victims of global strife, often have limited access to medical care, and have been found to lack required levels of sero-prevalence needed for herd immunity for vaccine-preventable infections.

 are all terms that are coming back into the human lexicon after decades of complacency about the protections of modern medicine. An “outbreak” is a sudden increase in a condition, or disease cluster-infectious or otherwise. An “epidemic” is defined as a widespread occurrence of an infectious or non-infectious disease in a community at a particular time; whereas a “pandemic” is an epidemic that crosses country and continent boundaries.

The effect of outbreaks on mental illness can be loosely conceptualized as:

• Potentially affecting existing illnesses;

• Precipitating new-onset mental symptoms in children or adults, possibly related to the interplay of immunity and mental illness; and

• Causing distress in the caretakers of affected individuals (

Alternatively, the psychiatrist can consider the effects in terms of acute versus chronic issues.

Outbreaks as precipitating risk factors for mental illness

Regardless of exposure, the stress of media news and fear of injury or death can contribute to a mental breakdown, whether mood-related or psychotic. This is not, however, a well-studied area. Small studies from the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leon and from the H1N1 outbreak in 2009 indicated an increase in depression, anxiety, and somatoform presentations.

In the acute phase, the onset of an outbreak can understandably instill fear in most individuals. This fear and concern can be amplified by pre-existing anxiety and depressive disorders. Personal reactions may differ, although increased rumination about the possibility of acquiring an illness or having already acquired an illness can profoundly modify behavior and socialization.

The effect of outbreaks on psychosis has not been studied fully, but worsening paranoia and the incorporation of outbreak-related facts into delusional thinking is highly likely; resulting delusional parasitosis is a possible logical extension of this event chain. Patients with mental illness have a higher rate of cutaneous/skin disorders at baseline and intensifying media coverage can exacerbate concern about dermatological manifestations.

 Severe anxiety can also precipitate a relapse into substance abuse in highly susceptible individuals as the stress level increases.

Furthermore, for patients struggling with depression or anxiety who are also parents, the effects can be deepened as concerns of protecting children arise. Psychiatrists may sometimes have to allay guilt feelings of parents worried about having caused their children’s illness, or not done enough to prevent it.

In youths, adult behavior may set the tone for coping skills, but the existence of certain personality characteristics or symptoms shape response to crisis. In rare cases, mental issues can be protective-children with social phobia have been found to have delayed onset of measles, mumps, and rubella, presumably because of their reluctance to socialize.

Lastly, anxiety and a feeling of helplessness can encourage the adoption of unproven methods and remedies that can be harmful or outright toxic. A solid therapeutic rapport between the patient and the psychiatrist can go a long way in managing those fears and reducing associated unhealthy behaviors.

Bidirectional effect of mental illness and immunity

As our understanding of the interaction between immunity and mental symptoms grows, it is obvious that worsening mental symptoms (eg, depression) can render a person more susceptible to certain physical ailments. This is supported by studies showing lower IgG titers of measles in individuals with major depressive disorders and diminished response to herpes zoster vaccination in elderly persons with depression.

Yet, psychoneuroimmunology findings do not consistently apply to children and adolescents, and at least one study has found that adolescents with depression exhibited an enhanced response to the influenza vaccine. Thus, more studies are needed in this area.

Conversely, some infections can cause longstanding sequelae. Some are relatively well characterized, such as post-measles subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), which occurs 7 to 10 years after a measles illness and present swith neuropsychiatric symptoms. Although SSPE-related mortality decreased with increased measles vaccine use, it is currently experiencing a resurgence.

Similarly, maternal infectious processes are related to mental problems in offspring. Following close to two million Swedish-born people for more than 40 years, Al-Haddad and colleagues

 found an increased rate of autism and depression following severe maternal infections.

Other after-effects of infections are less well understood. It is possible that the stress caused by infections distorts the relationship between the immune system and the CNS, triggering or consolidating a depressive process.

 Additionally, receiving the flu vaccine can worsen depressive symptoms in individuals with pre-existing depression or those pre-disposed to depression.

Stigma and shaming are closely intertwined with the nature of an outbreak. As recent pandemics have illustrated, humanity still has the potential to discriminate against its members for various afflictions. Individuals with human immunodeficiency virus face stigma on a regular basis, often with devastating results.Visible skin disease or scars contribute to stigma and subsequent psychosocial impairment.

 Historical examples of such stigma may be found in stories of individuals with leprosy, although other skin diseases (eg, cutaneous leishmaniasis and 

), and facial disfigurement of any kind; all of these have been associated with stigma and shunning.

In addition to communicable diseases and in light of recent debate on the benefits of preventive interventions, stigma can also extend to groups who are vaccinated versus those who are not. As communicable diseases resurge, the potential for a new group of target individuals that can be discriminated against also emerges, especially if lasting skin effects linger.

Anti-stigma measures can target a wide range of conditions, from HIV to mental illness to diseases with visible skin markings, and education is the most widely used measure. In the area of epidemics, psychiatry can have a pivotal role in promoting inclusiveness and anti-discriminatory practice, as well as helping patients deal with micro-aggressions and resulting mental symptoms.

Proactive approaches to understanding and managing outbreaks

In past decades, many infectious outbreaks have alarmed the public. The reasons for these vary from reduced immunity and under-vaccination to the emergence of new viral strains (as in the case of influenza). Salmonella outbreaks clusters are fairly common, but typically do not cause wide-ranging alarm beyond involved communities. Pertussis outbreaks occur in highly vaccinated communities when there is divergence between strains used in vaccines and those prevaqlent in the population.

The role of psychiatry varies depending on the etiology of the crisis and the magnitude of the impact on the community; psychiatrists also can facilitate the dialogue about vaccination-related choices. A heated debate is not unusual with the discussion of vaccinations. To better understand the shifts in perspective on vaccinations, the prospect theory of behavior may act as a potential framework to explain current attitudes towards mandatory vaccinations. While not all-encompassing, it may guide clinicians i nto a smoother discussion.

The prospect theory of behavior posits that decision-making varies based on whether gains versus losses are expected in a given situation as well as the extent and magnitude of expected gain/loss.

 “Loss aversion”-preferring to risk a greater loss rather than incurring a small yet certain loss-is a tenet of this model. The hypothesis is that when a major loss is expected but uncertain (such as a communicable disease that may never occur), risk-taking may increase, while gains may make an individual less prone to take risks.

Prospect theory has been used to provide an operationalized framework for various health-related behaviors including management of chronic diseases as well as to distinguish attitudes in clinical versus non-clinical decisions.

 Moreover, prospect theory can be helpful in framing the health care message underlying informed consents.

 In a study of women with children, Abhyankar and colleagues 20 found that the intent to get the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine for one’s child varied on whether the women were exposed to a loss-framed versus a gain-framed message, with variations in perceptions of vaccine efficacy.

A careful risk benefit analysis is needed for any community affected by outbreaks of infectious disease, and ongoing monitoring is essential. Perspective and accumulated experience can shape decision-making. For example, with a case of influenza virus, the choice of oseltamivir is a public health decision that benefits communities and saves lives. However, oseltamivir is associated with an increased odds ratio of adverse neuropsychiatric adverse effects including confusion, hallucinations, psychosis, anxiety, depression, mania, sleeping disorder, aggression, suicidal ideation, encephalitis, ataxia, and vertigo.

 Acute and long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms with untreated influenza illness can further complicate matters.

From an individual perspective, choosing to use a medication with known potential adverse effects may very well be subject to an emotional component congruent with prospect theory and subject to risk-taking paradigms. Decisions would conceivably change depending on the level of stress of the individual and surrounding circumstances, such as a raging epidemic.

Lessons learned and the role of psychiatry

The last few pandemics have yielded valuable lessons in terms of global responses. In a review of efforts since 1952, the World Health Organization noted that surveillance networks were instrumental in monitoring and mitigating the spread of influenzas viruses.

 It is hoped that similar organizational effort can target other re-emerging communicable diseases. Organized resources are crucial in terms of detection and marshalling quick local and community-wide responses, combined with proactive identification and treatment of index cases.

Addressing pandemics is now a science; it is a far cry from the panic that occurred in 1918. Responses are technically innovative and utilize extensive communication and monitoring to keep communities safe. The role of psychiatrists ranges widely from identifying vulnerable individuals and caring for them to reducing stigma through public education. In addition, psychiatrists’ contributions are crucial to institute proper policies to avoid contaminations and further spread of disease.

Dr Moukaddam is Associate Professor, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub Adult Outpatient Services Director, Medical Director, STAR (Stabilization, Treatment, and Rehabilitation) Program for Psychosis, Houston, TX. She reports no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.

American Pandemic: The Lost Words of the 1918 Influenza Epidemic.

 New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 42.

 Staehelin C, Chernet A, Sydow V, et al. Seroprotection rates of vaccine-preventable diseases among newly arrived Eritrean asylum seekers in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study. 

 Kamara S, Walder A, Duncan J, et al. Mental health care during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Sierra Leone. 

 Page LA, Seetharaman S, Suhail I, et al. Using electronic patient records to assess the impact of swine flu (influenza H1N1) on mental health patients. 

 Moftah NH, Kamel AM, Attia HM, et al. Skin diseases in patients with primary psychiatric conditions: a hospital based study. 

 Ajdacic-Gross V, Aleksandrowicz A, Rodgers S, et al. Social phobia is associated with delayed onset of chickenpox, measles, and mumps infections. 

 Ford BN, Yolken RH, Dickerson FB, et al. Reduced immunity to measles in adults with major depressive disorder. 

 Irwin MR, Levin MJ, Laudenslager ML, et al. Varicella zoster virus-specific immune responses to a herpes zoster vaccine in elderly recipients with major depression and the impact of antidepressant medications. 

 O’Connor TG, Moynihan JA, Wyman PA, et al. Depressive symptoms and immune response to meningococcal conjugate vaccine in early adolescence. 

 Al-Haddad BJS, Jacobsson B, Chabra S, et al. Long-term risk of neuropsychiatric disease after exposure to infection in utero. 

 Ramirez LA, Perez-Padilla EA, Garcia-Oscos F, et al. A new theory of depression based on the serotonin/kynurenine relationship and the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis. 

 Kuhlman KR, Robles TF, Dooley LN, et al. Within-subject associations between inflammation and features of depression: using the flu vaccine as a mild inflammatory stimulus. 

 Topp J, Andrees V, Weinberger N, et al. Strategies to reduce stigma related to visible chronic skin diseases: a systematic review. 

 Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, et al. The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. 

 Phadke VK, Bednarczyk RA, Salmon DA, Omer SB. Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis. 

 Konstantinidis E, Taylor RT, Newell BR. Magnitude and incentives: revisiting the overweighting of extreme events in risky decisions from experience. 

 Rouyard T, Attema A, Baskerville R, et al. Risk attitudes of people with ‘manageable’ chronic disease: an analysis under prospect theory. 

 Simianu VV, Grounds MA, Joslyn SL, et al. Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey. 

 Glare P, Fridman I, Ashton-James CE. Choose your words wisely: the impact of message framing on patients’ responses to treatment advice. 

 Abhyankar P, O’Connor DB, Lawton R. The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: evidence of a loss-frame advantage. 

 Hoffman KB, Demakas A, Erdman CB, et al. Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of oseltamivir in the FDA adverse event reporting system, 1999-2012. 

 Kang HR, Lee EK, Kim WJ, Shin JY. Risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with the use of oseltamivir: a nationwide population-based case-crossover study. 

 Honigsbaum M. An inexpressible dread: psychoses of influenza at fin-de-siecle. 

 Ziegler T, Mamahit A, Cox NJ. 65 years of influenza surveillance by a World Health Organization-coordinated global network. 