Should Americans Be Happier Than They Are?

COMMENTARY

The man who is a pessimist before 48 knows too much; if he is an optimist after it, he knows too little.

Should Americans feel happier than they do? Despite the heroic efforts of Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker, I remain unconvinced.

As a fellow humanist, I sympathize with Prof. Pinker’s predicament. Having amassed a bushel basket of data for his magisterial new book, Enlightenment Now,¹ the good professor is perplexed: why aren’t we Americans as happy as we should be, given all the wonderful things we have in our lives? (Spoiler alert: beware of those who tell you how really, really happy you should be).

Here, I’m focusing on Pinker’s chapter, “Happiness,” which most engaged my thinking as a psychiatrist. I hasten to add that I am in broad sympathy with Prof. Pinker’s larger aims in the book, which are founded on the belief that knowledge and reason can enhance human flourishing. What humanistically inclined psychiatrist could argue with that? And yet, I am deeply skeptical of Pinker’s implicit claim that Americans ought to be happier than they are. Indeed, I think that a failure to appreciate the legitimate sources of our nation’s current sadness and angst will only delay our emotional recovery.

Pinker gives numerous examples to support his thesis that the US suffers from an “Optimism Gap.” Since 1992, Pinker notes, homicide rates in the US have declined sharply. Maternal mortality in the US has fallen dramatically since the 1950s. And Americans, on average, have been getting richer (despite the fact, as Pinker concedes, that “the rich got richer faster than the poor and middle class got richer”). Leisure time for American men and women, on average, has increased markedly since the 1960s. And, Pinker argues, for all the hand-wringing about “right-wing backlashes” the values of Western countries, including the US, have been getting “steadily more liberal” since the 1980s.

So what’s to complain about? And yet, as Pinker vividly puts it, Americans “. . . seem to bitch, moan, whine, carp, and kvetch as much as ever. . . .” and the proportion of Americans who report being happy has held fairly steady for decades. Pinker notes that there has been a “slight decline” since 1972 in the proportion of Americans saying they are “very happy.” Actually, data from the 156-country 2018 World Happiness Report² show that the US ranks 18th in the world-a significant drop from 14th place in 2017.

To give Prof. Pinker his due: he bolsters his arguments with (count ‘em) 75 graphs and more than 30 pages of references. If, at times, he sounds like someone from the Murky Gulch Chamber of Commerce, trumpeting the town’s many virtues, Pinker is, nevertheless, an eloquent apostle of the Enlightenment-roughly the last two-thirds of the 18th century, known for its championing of “reason, science, humanism, and progress.” Indeed, Pinker is in the direct line of progressive optimists from Nicolas de Condorcet (1743–1794) to Barack Obama.

He reminds me, wistfully, of Ludovico Settembrini, the humanist pedagogue in Thomas Mann’s novel, The Magic Mountain.³ Like Pinker, Settembrini argues passionately for (in Mann’s words) “. . . the recent progress of humanitarian ideals” and “the triumphant forcing back of epidemic disease,” contrasting the “horrors of pestilence with the feats of modern medical science.” And, like Settembrini’s noble sentiments, Prof. Pinker’s thesis is only partly convincing.

So why aren’t Americans happier?

Pinker offers a number of hypotheses, which I will not detail here, for America’s Optimism Gap. (Two examples: “People have . . . lost their comforting faith in the goodness of their institutions . . .” and “. . . the media and commentariat . . . could reflect on their own role in keeping the country’s anxiety at a boil.”) For the most part, Pinker seems to argue that if only we, misinformed Americans, would look at the facts, we would realize how truly well off we are.

And, to be sure, Americans have many blessings for which to be grateful. But while Pinker is quick to point out how our biases can distort our perception of how good things are, he seems unaware of his own selective presentation and interpretation of the evidence. Pinker’s biases are evident in at least 3 areas that impinge on mental health issues.

1 Pinker rightly debunks the myth that “suicide has been steadily rising and has now reached historically high . . . or epidemic proportions.” Indeed, data from the Centers for Disease Control show that, for the US population as a whole, rates of completed suicide in the US (all ages) were about the same in 2010 as they were in 1960 and 1980 (12.1, 12.5, and 12.2 per 100,000, respectively).⁴ However, over the past 15 years, the total US suicide rate has increased 24% from 10.5 to 13.0 per 100,000-a statistic Pinker does not cite.

While Pinker acknowledges that “suicide rates rise sharply during adolescence,” he doesn’t acknowledge that suicide among US teens and young adults has nearly tripled since the 1940s.⁵ Furthermore, between 1999 and 2014, the suicide rate among adolescents (aged 10–14) nearly doubled, with most of the increase occurring after 2007, and with the sharpest rise occurring in girls.⁶

It is probably not coincidental that there have been large generational increases in psychopathology (based on MMPI data) among American college students between 1938 and 2007, according to the research of Dr. Jean Twenge and colleagues.⁷ Taken in toto, these findings do not paint a picture of happy young people in this country-and raise serious questions as to what is fueling these trends.

2 Pinker emphasizes the fact that, worldwide, life expectancy has increased markedly between 1771 and 2015, including in the Americas. But he does not discuss the fact that in the US, life expectancy has actually declined in recent years. Specifically, it declined 0.1 years between 2015 to 2016, following a decline of the same magnitude between 2014 and 2015.² As economist Jeffrey Sachs has observed, “This reversal in the upward trend of life expectancy is shocking and almost unprecedented for a rich country in recent decades.”² The Center for Disease Control has emphasized the role of rising substance abuse, and especially the modern opioid epidemic, in the reversal.

3 Rising income inequality in the US does not seem to trouble Prof. Pinker very much. He argues that income inequality per se is not the same thing as poverty; that “the majority of the human race has become much better off” in recent decades; and that, in any case, “. . . income inequality is not a fundamental component of well-being.” On this last point, I believe Pinker has overlooked substantial evidence to the contrary, though some of it probably emerged after the completion of his book.

For example, in a recent comprehensive analysis of income inequality and mental health, Vikram Patel and colleagues⁸ found a strong correlation between income inequality and elevated rates of depression. Specifically, in their review of 26 studies, mostly from high-income countries, the authors found that, “Nearly two-thirds of all studies and 5 out of 6 longitudinal studies reported a statistically significant positive relationship between income inequality and risk of depression; only one study reported a statistically significant negative relationship.” Of course, these findings do not prove that income inequality directly causes depression; however, the authors quite reasonably hypothesize that, “At the individual level, the effects of income inequality on general health are likely to be primarily mediated through psychological stress.”

Loneliness and social disconnection in the US

In his discussion of loneliness, Pinker heaps scorn on the “hysterical misconception” that “modern life [has] . . . set us drifting apart without human contact or emotion.” In support of his position, he provides a graph showing that, among US students (8th grade to college), loneliness has declined in the years from 1978 to 2011 (based on the UCLA Loneliness Scale). To be sure, there is little evidence of an “epidemic” of loneliness in the US, as sometimes claimed in the popular media, and reported rates of loneliness differ considerably, depending on the study methodology.

Research from the late Dr John Cacioppo,⁹ based on the decades-long, federally run Health and Retirement Study, suggests that rates of loneliness in the U.S. have probably increased on the order of 3% to 7% percent over the past 20 years. Moreover, Prof. Julianne Holt-Lunstad and colleagues¹⁰report that between 20% and 43% of US adults older than 60 experience frequent or intense loneliness. Since loneliness has been associated with impaired daytime functioning, reduced physical activity, lower subjective well-being, and poorer physical health,¹¹ the apparent increase in loneliness is certainly cause for concern. Indeed, it raises serious questions regarding “social connectedness” in American society. In that regard, Holt-Lunstad and colleagues have concluded that “. . . a significant portion of the US population lack social connections, which places them at greater risk for premature mortality and underlying morbidity.”

Unhappiness in the US has deeper roots

It is no great leap from these findings to the hypothesis that at least some of the increasing unhappiness Americans report is an understandable-and quite rational-response to high levels of social disconnection. But the problem goes deeper than that. As economist Jeffrey Sachs¹² has pointed out:

. . . while America’s income per capita has increased markedly during the past half century, several of the determinants of well-being have been in decline. Social support networks in the US have weakened over time; perceptions of corruption in government and business have risen over time; and confidence in public institutions has waned.

Beneath these trends, still darker currents swirl through American culture. As columnist David Brooks¹³ wrote, just prior to the 2016 US presidential election,

The great challenge of our moment is the crisis of isolation and fragmentation, the need to rebind the fabric of a society that has been torn by selfishness, cynicism, distrust, and autonomy. At some point there will have to be a new vocabulary and a restored anthropology, emphasizing love, friendship, faithfulness, solidarity, and neighborliness that pushes people toward connection rather than distrust.

Admittedly, it is hard to quantify the sum total of selfishness, cynicism, and distrust in this country, much less to plot the figure on a graph. Yet to minimize the presence and impact of these negative feelings is to miss the opportunity of restoring America’s “happiness.” Unlike Prof. Pinker, I think the declining state of American happiness is largely a rational response to the mess in which “we the people” find ourselves. And yet, like Pinker, I believe things can get better. Witness the idealism of the students who survived the Parkland High School shootings, and who now protest the unconscionable gun-related carnage in this country.

In the end, perhaps the most “reasonable” stance is neither optimism nor pessimism, but that of the philosopher, Jacques Barzun: “I have always been-I think any student of history almost inevitably is-a cheerful pessimist.”¹⁴

This article was originally published on 4/5/2018 and has since been updated.

Disclosures:

Dr Pies is Editor in Chief Emeritus of Psychiatric Times, and a Professor in the psychiatry departments of SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.

References:

1. Pinker S: Enlightenment Now. New York, Viking; 2018.

2. World Happiness Report, 2018. http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2018/. Accessed April 5, 2018.

3. Mann T. The Magic Mountain. New York: Vintage; 1996.

4. National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide.shtml#part_155137. Accessed April 5, 2018.

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/toolstemplates/entertainmented/tips/SuicideYouth.html. Accessed April 5, 2018.

6. Tavernise S. Young adolescents as likely to die from suicide as from traffic accidents. The New York Times. 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/04/health/suicide-adolescents-traffic-deaths.html. Accessed April 5, 2018.

7. Twenge JM, Gentile B, DeWall CN, et al. Birth cohort increases in psychopathology among young Americans, 1938-2007: a cross-temporal meta-analysis of the MMPI. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:145-154.

8. Patel V, Burns JK, Dhingra M, Tarver L, Kohrt BA, Lund C. Income inequality and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:76-89.

9. Khazan O. How loneliness begets loneliness. The Atlantic. 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/04/how-loneliness-begets-loneliness/521841/. Accessed April 5, 2018.

10. Holt-Lunstad J, Robles TF, Sbarra DA. Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. Am Psychol. 2017;72:517-530.

11. Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a mini-review and synthesis. Gerontol. 2016;62:443-449.

12. Sachs JD. America’s Health Crisis and the Easterlin Paradox. https://s3.amazonaws.com/happiness-report/2018/CH7-WHR-lr.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2018.

13. Brooks D. The death of idealism. The New York Times. 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/30/opinion/the-death-of-idealism.html. Accessed April 5, 2018.

14. Pies R. Don’t Worry-Nothing Will Turn Out Alright! CreateSpace; 2017.