Also In This Special Report
Sheldon H. Preskorn, MD
Frederick Charles Nucifora Jr, PhD, DO, MHS
Mary Ellen Trunko, MD; Guido K.W. Frank, MD; Terry A. Schwartz, MD; and Walter H. Kaye, MD
OCD is highly comorbid and warrants consideration in difficult to treat cases. Learn more here.
SPECIAL REPORT: TREATMENT RESISTANCE
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by repetitive thoughts, urges, and images (obsessions) and/or repetitive behaviors or mental acts aimed at reducing anxiety or distress (compulsions). OCD is thought to have a lifetime prevalence of between 1% to 3% and is a significant cause of disability worldwide.1
It is important to take consideration of clinical features, access, and tolerability when choosing between these options. Monotherapy with CBT with ERP may be recommended in patients with mild or moderate OCD. While monotherapy with an SSRI is often recommended in patients with more severe OCD, or in history of treatment response to SSRIs or
Sheldon H. Preskorn, MD
Frederick Charles Nucifora Jr, PhD, DO, MHS
Mary Ellen Trunko, MD; Guido K.W. Frank, MD; Terry A. Schwartz, MD; and Walter H. Kaye, MD
Case Vignette
“Melissa” is a 40-year-old female in an outpatient clinic with a history of OCD. When she first presented to clinic, she was prescribed sertraline, to which the OCD did not respond. She was switched to fluvoxamine, which was titrated to the maximum tolerated dose of 300 mg a day with partial response. She was also encouraged to begin CBT with ERP and has been consistent with treatment.
Melissa continues to endorse OCD symptoms, recounting how she spends several hours “checking the locks on my doors,” which frequently makes her late to work and appointments. She did not tolerate clomipramine or augmenting trials of risperidone or aripiprazole and is reluctant to trial any additional medications or surgery.
Initial Strategies
An inadequate treatment response with monotherapy of SSRIs or
With a partial treatment response, augmenting with an antipsychotic is a common and evidence supported strategy, although only about a third of patients will respond.8 The atypical antipsychotics
Our understanding of the biological underpinnings of
Glutamate
Glutamatergic dysfunction has been gaining evidence as playing a role in OCD, and numerous agents that modulate glutamatergic signaling are under investigation.15-18 One such agent is N-acetylcysteine (NAC), which effects the cystine-glutamate antiporter and can modulate glutamatergic neurotransmission. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested that NAC administered in doses of 600 to 3000 mg a day is safe, although there are still questions regarding efficacy.19
Co-agonists of the NMDA receptor and related compounds have also been investigated. Glycine, an NMDA-R co-agonist, was shown to have a modest effect on OCD symptoms, although this did not reach statistical significance and glycine was poorly tolerated.36 Compounds related to glycine have also been investigated. Rapastinel, a partial agonist at the glycine site of the NMDA-R, showed an acute positive effect on OCD symptoms in an open label trial, although these dissipated 1 week postinfusion.37 Sarcosine, a glycine transporter antagonist, showed a benefit in some OCD patients in an open-label study.38 D-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine site of the NMDA-R, has mixed data, but may play an augmenting role in ERP therapy for OCD.39
Inflammation
Aberrant functioning of the immune system is thought to play a role in OCD. Specifically, autoimmune disorders have been associated with OCD in children and adults, and inflammatory markers have been found to be elevated in the brains of individuals with OCD compared to healthy controls.40,41 Given these observations, anti-inflammatory and immune modulating agents have been investigated as a possible treatment option in OCD with limited, but promising results. Celecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, with a mechanism of cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibition, has been trialed as an SSRI augmenting agent in 2 trials and demonstrated superiority to placebo.42,43 Minocycline, an antibiotic with anti-inflammatory and anti-glutamatergic properties, was shown to have a positive treatment effect when combined with
Interestingly, gut microbiota, which regulate and are involved in maintaining immune homeostasis, have also been found to be altered in adult OCD patients.45,46 This has led to investigation of probiotics, which may help normalize the gut microbiota as a possible treatment modality. Animal studies have shown that probiotics may confer a benefit in obsessive-compulsive-like behavior, while clinical trials in humans are still ongoing.47
Noninvasive Neurostimulation
In recent years, there has been a focus on circuit-level brain changes in psychiatric disorders, and therapeutic modulation of these brain circuits. OCD has been associated with dysregulation in the CSTC loop, and noninvasive methods of stimulation, which can potentially alter these circuits, have been investigated as treatment options.48
A specific method of TMS developed by BrainsWay known as
New developments in TMS technology including theta burst stimulation (TBS), which may shorten the treatment time required for TMS, have also been trialed in OCD, although a randomized trial of continuous TBS for 2 weeks did not observe a significant improvement in symptoms with active stimulation versus sham.51 Another method of neurostimulation being investigated is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which involves placement of 2 electrodes on the scalp with application of weak electric current. tDCS in OCD has typically focused on targeting the SMA and orbitofrontal cortex, although results are mixed.52,53
Invasive Procedures
For highly refractory patients, ablative neurosurgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be considered, often in addition to ongoing pharmacological treatment and
In DBS trials for OCD, electrodes have often been implanted in the ventral capsule/ventral striatum, although other targets have included the subthalamic nucleus (STN) as well as the inferior thalamic peduncle.58 A recent systematic review of DBS for OCD reported approximately 60.6% of patients with a response of less than 35% reduction in Y-BOCS, at short-term (1.5 year) follow-up.59 Interestingly, the proportion of responders increased on longer-term (>5 year) follow-up to 70.7%. Adverse events are typically transient, although hemorrhage and infection are a small risk. While there have been no direct comparison trials of DBS versus ablative neurosurgery, a retrospective review of 20 studies found that patients undergoing capsulotomy had a greater reduction in Y-BOCS (51%) versus DBS of the VC/VS (40%) and were 9% more likely to go into remission (Y-BOCS <8).60 The review also noted similar complication rates between procedures. There is yet insufficient evidence to determine which procedure (DBS versus ablative neurosurgery) to use on an individual basis.61 Beyond these procedures, novel developments such as focused ultrasound are under investigation and may provide safer surgical options in the future.
Novel Mechanisms
Beyond the aforementioned treatment options, novel medications with unique mechanisms of action are currently under investigation for OCD, including
Concluding Thoughts
While definitions of treatment-resistance vary, lack of response to SSRIs and CBT warrant next steps. With nonresponse, a switch to another serotonergic agent may be indicated. With a partial response, there is strong evidence to support the use of
Numerous glutamatergic agents are under investigation, data here is mixed warranting of further investigation. Medications that modulate the immune system and inflammatory response are also being studied and show promising preliminary results. Neurostimulation modalities are also being developed, initial research is supportive of TMS, and recent FDA approval of TMS as an adjunct for OCD will likely lead to an increase of use in clinical practice. Invasive surgical options including DBS and ablative procedures remain an option for treatment refractory cases who have failed numerous treatment options. Finally, medications with novel mechanisms of action and complementary treatment modalities are under investigation in OCD.
Dr Artin is a psychiatrist affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California San Diego. Dr Sloan is a psychiatrist affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California San Diego. Dr Daskalakis is a professor and chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California San Diego.
References
1. Hirschtritt ME, Bloch MH, Mathews CA.
2. Koran LM, Hanna GL, Hollander E, et al; American Psychiatric Association.
3. Albert U, Marazziti D, Di Salvo G, et al.
4. Bloch MH, Green C, Kichuk SA, et al.
5. Tundo A, Salvati L, Busto G, et al.
6. Bloch MH, McGuire J, Landeros-Weisenberger A, et al.
7. Marcourakis R, Bernik MA, Lotufo Neto F, et al.
8. Thamby A, Jaisoorya TS.
9. McDougle CJ, Epperson CN, Pelton GH, et al.
10. Albert U, Carmassi C, Cosci F, et al.
11. Shapira NA, Ward HE, Mandoki M, et al.
12. Kordon A, Wahl K, Koch N, et al.
13. McDougle CJ, Goodman WK, Leckman JF, et al.
14. McDougle CJ, Goodman WK, Price LH, et al.
15. Chakrabarty K, Bhattacharyya S, Christopher R, Khanna S.
16. Starck G, Ljungberg M, Nilsson M, et al.
17. Karthik S, Sharma LP, Narayanaswamy JC.
18. Marinova Z, Chuang DM, Fineberg N.
19. Gadallah AHA, Ebada MA, Gadallah A, et al. Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine as add-on therapy in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2020;25:100529.
20. Pittenger C, Bloch MH, Wasylink S, et al.
21. Emamzadehfard S, Kamaloo A, Paydary K, et al.
22. Coric V, Taskiran S, Pittenger C, et al.
23. Aboujaoude E, Barry JJ, Gamel N.
24. Feusner JD, Kerwin L, Saxena S, Bystritsky A.
25. Ghaleiha A, Entezari N, Modabbernia A, et al.
26. Haghighi M, Jahangard L, Mohammad-Beigi H, et al.
27. Modarresi A, Sayyah M, Razooghi S, et al.
28. Rodriguez CI, Kegeles LS, Flood P, Simpson HB.
29. Rodriguez CI, Kegeles LS, Levinson A, et al.
30. Bloch MH, Wasylink S, Landeros-Weisenberger A, et al.
31. Rodriguez CI, Lapidus KAB, Zwerling J, et al.
32. Matteo M, Cristian P, Laura M, et al.
33. Adams T, Bloch M, Pittenger C.
34. Rodriguez CI, Wheaton M, Zwerling J, et al.
35. Grassi G, Cecchelli C, Vignozzi L, Pacini S.
36. Greenberg WM, Benedict MM, Doerfer J, et al.
37. Rodriguez CI, Zwerling J, Kalanthroff E, et al.
38. Wu PL, Tang HS, Lane HY, et al.
39. Rosenfield D, Smits JAJ, Hofmann SG, et al.
40. Khandaker GM, Dantzer R, Jones PB.
41. Attwells S, Setiawan E, Wilson AA, et al.
42. Shalbafan M, Mohammadinejad P, Shariat SV, et al.
43. Sayyah M, Boostani H, Pakseresht S, Malayeri A.
44. Esalatmanesh S, Abrishami Z, Zeinoddini A, et al.
45. Turna J, Grosman Kaplan K, Anglin R, et al.
46. Wu HJ, Wu E.
47. Kantak PA, Bobrow DN, Nyby JG.
48. Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, et al.
49. Liang K, Li H, Bu X, et al.
50. Carmi L, Tendler A, Bystritsky A, et al.
51. Liu W, Shao H, Liao J, et al.
52. Gowda SM, Narayanaswamy JC, Hazari N, et al.
53. Bation R, Mondino M, Le Camus F, et al.
54. Fontenelle LF, Coutinho ESF, Lins-Martins NM, et al.
55. Tang VM, Blumberger DM, Weissman CR, et al.
56. Doshi PK.
57. Brown LT, Mikell CB, Youngerman BE, et al.
58. Bergfeld IO, Dijkstra E, Graat I, et al.
59. Mar-Barrutia L, Real E, Segalás C, et al.
60. Pepper J, Hariz M, Zrinzo L.
61. Fineberg NA, Hollander E, Pallanti S, et al.
over 4 years ago
The Current State of the Art and the Not Too Distant Futureover 4 years ago
5 Crypto Investing Rules for Busy Doctorsover 4 years ago
What Can Philosophy Learn From Madness?over 4 years ago
Tender Fencesover 4 years ago
Doorknob Moments: Why They Happen and How to Use Themalmost 5 years ago
Advances in Treatments for ADHDalmost 5 years ago
Chatbots for Child Mental Health Care: Helpful, but Limited





