Publication|Articles|September 18, 2026

Psychiatric Times

  • Vol 43, Issue 9

Adequately Addressing Tardive Dyskinesia: Clinical Tips and Insights

Listen
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Utilization trends show increased SGA prescribing alongside doubled overdose rates, underscoring persistent safety liabilities despite perceptions of improved tolerability vs FGAs.
  • TD risk scales with D2 receptor occupancy and cumulative exposure; occupancy beyond ~80% increases parkinsonism and subsequent TD, independent of FGA vs SGA classification.
SHOW MORE

Learn how to prevent and spot tardive dyskinesia from antipsychotics, track key risk factors, and treat symptoms with VMAT2 inhibitors.

The use of antipsychotic medications is increasing in Western countries, primarily related to increased nonpsychotic indications and some off-label use.1-3 There are concerns that clinicians underestimate the risk of potential adverse effects associated with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs).4,5 Despite a general perception that SGAs are safer than those in the first generation, data suggest that along with the nearly doubling of use of SGAs, there has been a doubling in the rates of antipsychotic overdoses, with the same level of consequent morbidity and mortality.1

One of the most troubling adverse effects of antipsychotic medications is tardive dyskinesia (TD). TD is a severe and frequently permanent movement disorder that occurs as a consequence of chronic use of dopamine-blocking agents, which include some antipsychotics and some antiemetics. Concerns over the induction of TD were the main driver of clinicians’ switch from first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) to SGA medications.6 Indeed, the annualized risk of developing TD with SGAs was less than half than the risk associated with FGAs (6.5%, 95% CI, 5.3%‐7.8% vs 2.6%, 95% CI, 2.0%‐3.1%; RR=0.47, 95% CI, 0.39‐0.57, P < .0001). However, TD risk is associated with upregulation of the dopaminergic pathways, and that is related to the extent of blockade of the D2 receptors,7 so it is not surprising that the risk of developing TD increases in a dose-dependent manner independent of whether the drug was an FGA or SGA.8 This is related to the fact that an increased dose is generally associated with increased D2 receptor occupancy, and if receptor occupancy of a D2 antagonist exceeds 80%, there is a significant increase in parkinsonism and eventual TD.9

Recognizing Risk Factors

Parkinsonism and the use of anticholinergic agents are among the best predictors of the eventual development of TD,7 and anticholinergic agents, such as benztropine, actually make TD worse.10 Consequently, reducing the antipsychotic dose is the preferred management strategy for drug-induced parkinsonism.10 Additional risk factors include longer duration of antipsychotic treatment, mood disorder diagnosis, being female, and advancing age.11,12

Once TD develops, African American ancestry is associated with a poorer prognosis.13 Early detection is essential to optimize outcome.14 Dose reduction or use of an anti-TD drug can improve the course of this complication.14 Screening is generally recommended annually or every 6 months, and with in-person use of the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale15 or the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, which is more cumbersome because it rates both parkinsonism and TD.16 Although any striated muscle can be impacted, the most highly innervated muscles are more susceptible, which means that the orofacial muscles and the index fingers and thumb are frequently the first to display abnormal movements. Since parkinsonism is frequent, it is important to distinguish dyskinetic movements from parkinsonian tremor. Early in the course of TD, the first abnormal movements may be fasciculations of muscles on the surface of the tongue. To distinguish TD from other movement disorders that occur in patients, such as parkinsonism and mannerisms, one should remember that TD is random and unpredictable, whereas mannerisms and tremor are repetitious and predictable.

Minimize Exposure

Once TD is recognized, clinicians should minimize exposure to the offending agent. This generally means discontinuation or reduction of the dose of the antipsychotic drug, if possible. Switching to antipsychotics with a low affinity to dopamine, such as clozapine or quetiapine, is frequently recommended.17,18 The muscarinic agonist antipsychotic xanomeline/trospium has not been used in patients with TD, and an older review of procholinergic drugs in the treatment of TD (which included xanomeline without trospium) could not find a reliable effect—either way—on TD.19 One should consider starting a vesicular monoamine transport (VMAT) inhibitor. In the central nervous system, this is VMAT2.20 This is a reasonable therapeutic target since TD is related to upregulation of the dopamine system. While this is frequently thought of as “dopamine receptor supersensitivity,” it is actually related to increases in dopamine release, the number of dopaminergic synapses, and the increase in expression of postsynaptic receptors.7 Inhibition of VMAT2 results in reduced quantities of dopamine release and turnover, which reduces the abnormal movements.

Psychopharmacologic Interventions

Tetrabenazine is a specific VMAT2 inhibitor that is effective for TD but has unreliable pharmacokinetics.21,22 Innovative modifications have resulted in 2 unique agents that are effective for TD: valbenazine (Ingrezza) and deutetrabenazine (Austedo).23-25 Valbenazine links the tetrabenazine molecule to an amino acid, valine. The valine must be cleaved with a peptidase from the valbenazine molecule to release the active tetrabenazine. This slows down the release of free tetrabenazine in a predictable manner. Deutetrabenazine replaces some of the hydrogen molecules on tetrabenazine with deuterium, which slows down its metabolism. Both these agents are available as single daily doses and have similar adverse effect profiles. Both have demonstrated reductions in TD symptoms without any evidence of inducing progression of the TD or any rebound worsening after discontinuation.26 The reductions of the abnormal movements are approximately 50% from baseline but associated with marked improvement in function.27

Concluding Thoughts

TD can be quite disabling with consequences that exceed the physical movements with induction of self-consciousness and reduction of self-confidence and quality of life. Unfortunately, when modern FGAs were introduced, clinicians believed that parkinsonism was necessary to achieve the therapeutic antipsychotic effect. Consequently, commonly used doses of FGAs are more likely to induce movement disorders. If FGAs are used, one needs to always determine the minimal effective dose. The brain’s adaptive changes resulting from chronic antipsychotic treatment may result in a progressive need to increase the dose or potency of the antipsychotic medication. In this light, clinicians should consider initiating treatment in naive patients with partial agonist agents since they cause fewer changes.28Augmentation can be accomplished with antioxidants including ginkgo biloba extracts, vitamin B6, vitamin E, Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), which act as antioxidants and may reduce neuronal degeneration.29 Complications (eg, intolerance to VMAT2 inhibitors) can be addressed with use of clonazepam.29 Should TD progress and become more severe than that managed by VMAT2 inhibitors or if the involvement of a specific muscle is causing dangerous medical problems (eg, pharyngeal TD), one can consider botulinum toxin (onabotulinumtoxinA) or deep brain stimulation.29

Dr El-Mallakh is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and director of the Mood Disorders Research Program at the University of Louisville School of Medicine in Kentucky.

Ms Woods is a nurse practitioner practicing medicine in Louisville, Kentucky.

References

1. Berling I, Buckley NA, Isbister GK. The antipsychotic story: changes in prescriptions and overdose without better safety. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(1):249-254.

2. Newman H, Branford D, Laugharne R, et al. Twenty-five year trend in antipsychotic medication prescribing in England: challenges and opportunities. BJPsych Open. 2025;11(4):e151.

3. Alexander GC, Gallagher SA, Mascola A, et al. Increasing off-label use of antipsychotic medications in the United States, 1995-2008. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(2):177-184.

4. Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Clinicians' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(3):407-419.

5. Bhardwaj S, Pathak K, McLenon M, et al. Antipsychotic misuse: a silent but growing public health hazard. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e98275.

6. Leucht S, Priller J, Davis JM. Antipsychotic drugs: a concise review of history, classification, indications, mechanism, efficacy, side effects, dosing, and clinical application. Am J Psychiatry. 2024;181(10):865-878.

7. Ali Z, Roque A, El-Mallakh RS. A unifying theory for the pathoetiologic mechanism of tardive dyskinesia. Med Hypotheses. 2020;140:109682.

8. Gouda M, Abe M, Watanabe Y, Kato TA. Analysis of antipsychotic dosage in patients with tardive dyskinesia: a case-control study using the claims database of the Corporate Health Insurance Association. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024;44(4):378-385.

9. Siafis S, Wu H, Wang D, et al. Antipsychotic dose, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and extrapyramidal side-effects: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(8):3267-3277.

10. Ward KM, Citrome L. Antipsychotic-related movement disorders: drug-induced parkinsonism vs. tardive dyskinesia-key differences in pathophysiology and clinical management. Neurol Ther. 2018;7(2):233-248.

11. Correll CU, Kane JM, Citrome LL. Epidemiology, prevention, and assessment of tardive dyskinesia and advances in treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(8):1136-1147.

12. Solmi M, Pigato G, Kane JM, Correll CU. Clinical risk factors for the development of tardive dyskinesia. J Neurol Sci. 2018;389:21-27.

13. Wonodi I, Adami HM, Cassady SL, et al. Ethnicity and the course of tardive dyskinesia in outpatients presenting to the motor disorders clinic at the Maryland psychiatric research center. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;24(6):592-598.

14. McEvoy JP, Kremens DE. Early recognition and treatment of tardive dyskinesia in patients with mood disorders and schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(1):NU18041AH5C.

15. El-Mallakh RS, Belnap A, Iyer S, et al. Telehealth for assessing and managing tardive dyskinesia: expert insights from a cross-disciplinary virtual treatment panel. Telemed J E Health. 2023;29(7):1096-1104.

16. Chouinard G, Margolese HC. Manual for the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). Schizophr Res. 2005;76(2-3):247-265.

17. Dalack GW, Becks L, Meador-Woodruff JH. Tardive dyskinesia, clozapine, and treatment response. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1998;22(4):567-573.

18. Navarro Pacheco BV, Montejo González AL, Martín Carrasco M. [Utility of quetiapine in tardive dyskinesia]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2003;31(6):347-352.

19. Tammenmaa-Aho I, Asher R, Soares-Weiser K, Bergman H. Cholinergic medication for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3(3):CD000207.

20. Bernstein AI, Stout KA, Miller GW. The vesicular monoamine transporter 2: an underexplored pharmacological target. Neurochem Int. 2014;73:89-97.

21. Ondo WG, Hanna PA, Jankovic J. Tetrabenazine treatment for tardive dyskinesia: assessment by randomized videotape protocol. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(8):1279-1281.

22. Mehvar R, Jamali F, Watson MW, Skelton D. Pharmacokinetics of tetrabenazine and its major metabolite in man and rat. bioavailability and dose dependency studies. Drug Metab Dispos. 1987;15(2):250-255.

23. Hauser RA, Factor SA, Marder SR, et al. KINECT 3: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valbenazine for tardive dyskinesia. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(5):476-484.

24. Watanabe Y, Susuta Y, Masui H, Takeuchi H. Factors predicting the efficacy of valbenazine and exacerbation of tardive dyskinesia after valbenazine discontinuation in Japanese patients: a post hoc analysis of the J-KINECT study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2026;46(1):30-35.

25. Anderson KE, Stamler D, Davis MD, et al. Deutetrabenazine for treatment of involuntary movements in patients with tardive dyskinesia (AIM-TD): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(8):595-604.

26. Horiguchi J, Watanabe K, Kondo K, et al. Efficacy and safety of valbenazine in Japanese patients with tardive dyskinesia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (J-KINECT). Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022;76(11):560-569.

27. Meyer JM, Chepke C, Bera RB, et al. Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review. Ment Health Clin. 2023;13(5):225-232.

28. Sleem A, El-Mallakh RS. Adaptive changes to antipsychotics: how to avoid the consequences. Curr Psychiatry. 2022;21(7):46-50,52.

29. Bhidayasiri R, Jitkritsadakul O, Friedman JH, Fahn S. Updating the recommendations for treatment of tardive syndromes: a systematic review of new evidence and practical treatment algorithm. J Neurol Sci. 2018;389:67-75.


Related to this article