Mary Ellen Trunko, MD

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a serious disorder characterized by recurrent large-volume eating episodes that are marked by a loss of control (binge eating), regular compensatory behaviors that are intended to prevent weight gain (purging), and over-valuation of body shape and weight. BN is associated with psychiatric comorbidity, significant psychosocial impairment, medical complications, and increased mortality.

Clinical guidelines for the evidence-based treatment of BN highlight first-line, outpatient psychotherapeutic and pharmacological approaches. Self-help, enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and interpersonal psychotherapy are considered first-line psychotherapeutic interventions. Antidepressants, most notably SSRIs and specifically fluoxetine, which is FDA-approved for use in BN, are recommended adjunctive first-line treatments. Limited data suggest that CBT-BN alone and CBT-BN plus antidepressants are more efficacious than antidepressants alone.

 Despite these available treatment options, roughly 30% of cases are chronic and unremitting. Even for those who do initially respond to treatment, estimated rates of relapse in BN range from 25% to 63%.

Melia is a patient with treatment-refractory, complex BN, who presents for treatment at our eating disorders program. A 20-year-old college student, she plans to attend law school after graduation.

Her eating disorder began in her freshman year, when she started “using food to cope” after a difficult breakup and domestic violence. Before admission, she was eating salads or diet frozen entrÃ©es for most meals and binge eating and purging 3 to 5 times a day. She has a history of self-harming behaviors and 2 suicide attempts.

She reports frequent shoplifting, occasional binge drinking to the point of blacking out, and recurrent unsafe sex with men she meets at bars. She previously had attempted outpatient, partial hospital, and residential treatment but had been unable to sustain recovery. She also had several trials of antidepressant medication without response for depression, anxiety, and eating-disordered symptoms.

Melia reports that she feels “very stressed” at school and has high standards for herself. She has had to withdraw from school several times to pursue treatment.

Improving outcomes for individuals with treatment-resistant BN such as Melia hinges on:

 Developing an understanding of what factors make treatment failure or dropout more likely

 Generating hypotheses about the mechanisms of non-response

 Proposing and evaluating treatments that address these hypothesized mechanisms

In general, first-line psychotherapeutic treatments-whether delivered in person or via telemedicine-result in remission in only 30% to 50% of adult patients with BN.

 These first-line treatments are often particularly ineffective for the large subset of patients who struggle with a range of other dysregulated behaviors. To date, despite some inconsistency in the literature, predictors of worse outcome or treatment dropout include longer duration and more severe eating disorder symptom profiles, comorbid psychopathology such as depression or substance use, and characteristics of personality pathology such as affective instability and impulsivity.

. Patients with BN have high rates of comorbidity with other psychiatric conditions, including mood, anxiety, and impulse-control disorders. Impulsive behaviors and comorbid disorders defined by behavioral dysregulation are common in BN, including substance use disorders (approximately 37%), ADHD (about 35%), borderline personality disorder (approximately 28%), self-injurious behavior, risky sexual activity, and shoplifting.

 Moreover, BN is associated with suicidality independent of comorbidities.

 The range and extent of co-occurring psychopathology are associated with poorer treatment outcome and thus can present profound challenges to the application of evidence-based treatment. Unfortunately, strictly controlled treatment trials often exclude those with significant comorbidity, which leaves a void in our understanding of best practices for our most complex patients.

 Individuals with BN report significantly higher levels of emotion intensity, deficits in emotional awareness, and increased use of dysfunctional strategies for emotion regulation.

 Impulsive behaviors may function to regulate dysphoric, extreme mood states. Paradoxically, these behaviors may evoke more negative emotion, which leaves the patient trapped in a cycle of dysregulated emotions and behaviors.

Limited development of effective, evidence-based medication strategies.

 Another potential factor in poor treatment response may be the lack of development of medication strategies that might help patients regulate affect. Randomized controlled trials in the 1980s and early 1990s established antidepressants as superior to placebo in reducing symptoms of BN. The largest studies by far involved fluoxetine-hence, the FDA indication. Subsequently, the antiepileptic drug topiramate was shown to treat BN symptoms more effectively than placebo.

It is important, however, to understand the nature of these trials in determining clinical applicability. Positive response was often defined as a 50% or more reduction in weekly binge and/or purge episodes. While impressive, this decrease left many patients still meeting DSM criteria for BN at completion of the studies, and full remission rates were much lower.

Up to one-half of patients who present for treatment of BN would have been excluded from the studies, primarily for comorbidities. Finally, most trials were small and short term.

 This may be especially concerning with regard to topiramate, which has fairly widespread use in BN despite well-known tolerability issues and the potential adverse effect of unhealthy weight loss in BN patients striving for thinness. It may surprise some clinicians to know that this approach is based on randomization to topiramate or placebo of only approximately 130 patients, for a period of just 10 weeks.

 Despite the apparent limited benefit of medications in BN, there has been virtually no research in this area for more than a decade.

Improved understanding of the neurobiology and associated features of BN may provide both an explanation for poor response to evidence-based treatment, and a framework for improved treatment approaches. Impaired inhibitory control and aberrant reward responsivity and reward-based learning may contribute to the affective dysregulation, binge eating, purging, and other impulsive behaviors often reported by individuals with BN. Extant neuroimaging findings in BN suggest abnormal functioning of the corticostriatal and corticolimbic circuits that support these processes, and this altered functioning has been linked to increased bulimic symptom frequency.

 Dysfunction in these circuits may leave patients with powerful urges to inappropriately initiate or continue eating or to purge, and, in combination with impaired learning, may interfere with response to treatment.

Designing successful interventions requires consideration that abnormal neurobiological functioning may contribute to BN and associated behaviors, and these behaviors appear to serve the purpose of temporarily reducing intolerable emotional intensity. Specifically, treatments for refractory BN may include a focus on skills and strategies designed to help patients regulate emotions and cope with altered inhibitory control and reward sensitivity.

Developments in psychotherapeutic strategies.

 Psychotherapeutic interventions for treatment-resistant BN may specifically focus on skills that help patients cope with their dysregulated emotions, thereby reducing impulsive behaviors. Recent treatments developed to address emotion dysregulation within BN include integrative cognitive-affective therapy, adaptations of CBT, and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT).

DBT originally was developed for patients with intense emotion dysregulation, borderline personality disorder, and/or suicidality, and has been adapted and studied for use with eating disorders.

 With its heavy emphasis on skill development for tolerating distress and regulating emotions, along with its structured approach to treating complex comorbidities, DBT may be particularly effective in mitigating biologically driven vulnerabilities to unstable affect and maladaptive, impulsive behaviors.

 Considering the prevalence and morbidity of BN, along with the limited efficacy of antidepressants and safety concerns about topiramate for many patients, the lack of new research into pharmacological treatments during the past decade and present day is notable. Recently, a few encouraging but very small open series and case reports have been published. Some of these have utilized antiepileptic drugs-namely, zonisamide and lamotrigine, which warrant further exploration for treatment-refractory BN.

 Similar to topiramate, zonisamide has an adverse-effect profile that may limit its use in patients with eating disorders.

Lamotrigine, with its relative weight neutrality, greater tolerability, and demonstrated benefit in other conditions characterized by affective dysregulation and impulsivity (eg, bipolar disorder), may hold the most promise. The decreases in emotional and behavioral dysregulation associated with lamotrigine may blunt or delay impulsive urges enough to allow patients to use skills, ultimately permitting engagement with empirically supported psychological treatments.

 However, controlled trials of lamotrigine are needed.

Recent FDA approval of lisdexamfetamine (a CNS stimulant) for binge eating disorder has heightened interest in potential use of such medications in BN. Some investigators hypothesize that CNS stimulants may address inhibitory control deficits or deficient reward systems in dysregulated eating disorders in a similar manner as in ADHD. A retrospective series published earlier this year showed large reductions in binge and purge symptoms in 6 patients with chronic BN.

 While this is intriguing, substantial risks associated with use of these controlled substances in dysregulated BN may make CNS stimulants prohibitive.

The relatively weight-neutral atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole showed benefit as augmentation to antidepressants in 2 small groups of treatment-refractory BN case reports.

 It is interesting to speculate whether the partial-agonist properties of aripiprazole may improve stabilization of dopamine/serotonin neurotransmitter systems, which have shown abnormalities in BN.

Although consensus exists among practitioners that co-occurring disorders must be addressed in BN treatment, when and how to do so remains a subject of much debate and is a critical consideration in treatment planning. Medication management of comorbidities such as MDD, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders is beyond the scope of this article, but is an important aspect of comprehensive care that may improve the capacity of BN patients to engage in treatment. Evidence-based protocols (eg, CBT for depression, prolonged exposure for PTSD) exist for most comorbidities, but it can be difficult to know how to integrate those treatment protocols with the treatment of the primary eating disorder.

Treatment can take place sequentially, or it can follow an integrated approach that treats all conditions concurrently. Sequential treatment may be advantageous in that it allows the clinician to address safety concerns presented by the eating disorder first, may reduce barriers to the effectiveness of the other treatment, and may be logistically more practical. However, treating one cluster of symptoms may result in worsening of other behaviors, and this cycling may prevent recovery from both disorders. Thus, more recently, concurrent or integrated treatments across comorbidities have become the preferred approach. Regardless of the chosen timing, comorbid conditions should be addressed with evidence-based treatment.

For Melia, the combination of DBT and lamotrigine was very effective. Melia had begun to learn DBT skills in past treatment episodes, but reported difficulty applying the skills because her impulsivity was so strong that she felt there was “no time” between an urge and a behavior to attempt to use the skills. With the addition of lamotrigine, she still experienced urges to binge, purge, shoplift, and self-harm, but she demonstrated increased ability to delay urges long enough to call her therapist for skills coaching. DBT hierarchy helped her therapist organize and prioritize Melia’s treatment targets.

DBT has a focus on helping the patient build a “life worth living” outside the disorder. For Melia, this was difficult because she felt that anything short of immediately completing school with top grades and going to law school would be failure. During treatment, she was able to be less judgmental of herself, and she got a temporary job as a paralegal while she focused on recovery. Her depression and anxiety also improved, and she gained more insight into balancing career and other life goals. Ultimately, she graduated college with plans to attend law school.

Despite significant progress in our understanding of the biological substrates of BN during the past decade, traditional evidence-based treatments fail to help many patients achieve full remission of symptoms. Development and rigorous evaluation of new treatment approaches-particularly those that target characteristics of chronic, treatment-refractory BN-remain crucial tasks in decreasing suffering for patients such as Melia.

Dr. Anderson is Clinical Associate Professor, Dr. Reilly is Postdoctoral Fellow, Dr. Berner is Postdoctoral Fellow, Dr. Trunko is Clinical Associate Professor, and Dr. Kaye is Professor and Director, Eating Disorders Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA.

The authors report no conflicts of interest concerning the subject matter of this article.

 Wilson G, Shafran R. Eating disorders guidelines from NICE. 

 Keel P, Dorer D, Franko D, et al. Postremission predictors of relapse in women with eating disorders. 

 Yager J, Devlin M, Halmi K, et al. Guideline watch: practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. 

 Vall E, Wade T. Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 

 Hudson J, Hiripi E, Pope H, Kessler R. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. 

 Sansone R, Levitt J, Sansone L. The prevalence of personality disorders among those with eating disorders. 

 Fischer S, Smith GT, Anderson KG. Clarifying the role of impulsivity in bulimia nervosa. 

 Bodell L, Joiner T, Keel P. Comorbidity-independent risk for suicidality increases with bulimia nervosa but not with anorexia nervosa. 

 Svaldi JG, Tuschen-Caffier B, Ehring T. Emotion regulation deficits in eating disorders: a marker of eating pathology or general psychopathology? 

 Trunko M, Kaye WH. Pharmacological treatment of bulimia nervosa: a review of available medications. 

 Bacaltchuk J, Hay P. Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa. 

 Berner L, Marsh R. Frontostriatal circuits and the development of bulimia nervosa. 

 Bankoff S, Karpel M, Forbes H, Pantalone D. A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy for the treatment of eating disorders. 

 Guerdjikova A, Blom T, Martens B, et al. Zonisamide in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: an open-label, pilot, prospective study. 

 Trunko M, Schwartz T, Marzola E, et al. Lamotrigine use in patients with binge eating and purging, significant affect dysregulation, and poor impulse control. 

 McElroy S, Guerdjikova A, Martens B, et al. Role of antiepileptic drugs in the management of eating disorders. 

 Trunko M, Schwartz T, Berner L, et al. A pilot open series of lamotrigine in eating disorders characterized by significant affect dysregulation and poor impulse control. Presented at: International Conference on Eating Disorders; June 2017; Prague, Czech Republic. Poster No. F004.

 Keshen A, Helson T. Preliminary evidence for the off-label treatment of bulimia nervosa with psychostimulants: six case reports. 

 Trunko M, Schwartz T, Duvvuri V, Kaye WH. Aripiprazole in anorexia nervosa and low-weight bulimia nervosa: case reports. 

 Takaki M, Okabe N. Aripiprazole may be effective as an add-on treatment in bulimic symptoms of eating disorders. 

Articles

Dialectical behavior therapy may be particularly effective in mitigating biologically-driven vulnerabilities, and zonisamide and lamotrigine may play a role.

Treatment-Resistant Bulimia Nervosa: Clinical Implications and Future Directions

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a disorder with a complex cause. The disorder is most commonly seen in women, generally with onset in adolescence. It is characterized by binge eating (consumption of an unusually large amount of food accompanied by feeling a loss of control), inappropriate compensatory measures to prevent weight gain (including purging by vomiting, abuse of laxatives and diuretics, strict dieting, and excessive exercise), obsessive fears of being fat, and negative self-evaluation influenced largely by body shape and weight.

BN is often associated with anxiety, depression, obsessionality, substance abuse, and poor impulse control.

Antidepressants are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for BN. In the 1980s and early 1990s they were established as more effective than placebo in treating BN in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that tested a variety of medication classes, including tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and more recently, SSRIs.

Success was most commonly measured by a decrease in the number of bingeing and purging episodes, and although the studies varied widely, many patients achieved short-term reductions of 50% to 75% in one or both areas.

Much less attention has been focused on whether antidepressants are as useful in reducing mood and impulse control problems often comorbid with BN.

While the observed reductions in eating-disordered behaviors were significant, it is important to realize that many patients who responded to medication continued to binge and purge at a frequency that still met criteria for a diagnosis of BN at the end of the studies. Only a minority of patients attained remission of the bingeing and purging symptoms.



Another caveat concerns the clinical applicability of trial data, because some have estimated that one-third to one-half of patients who present for treatment of BN would have been excluded from treatment studies because of accompanying substance abuse, personality disorders, current or earlier use of psychotropic medication, and other factors.


With their relatively benign adverse-effect profiles, SSRIs are the first-line pharmacological treatment of BN.

 Fluoxetine is the most studied of the antidepressants in this country, and the only medication approved by the FDA for treatment of BN. The indication was granted in 1996, after 2 large, multicenter, controlled trials convincingly demonstrated that fluoxetine was more efficacious than placebo for treatment of BN.

The first, an 8-week study that included nearly 400 patients, showed a response at a relatively high dosage of 60 mg/d, while a dosage of 20 mg/d was no different from placebo.

The second trial, with a duration of 16 weeks, revealed that a starting dosage of 60 mg/d was generally well tolerated in this patient population.



Trials with other SSRIs have been scant. Several conducted with fluvoxamine had problems with tolerability and mixed results regarding efficacy.

In a large randomized trial involving 267 patients, fluvoxamine was no better than placebo for short- or long-term (1 year) treatment of outpatients with BN. The investigators acknowledged that the dosage range of 50 to 300 mg/d may have been too low to show a treatment effect with this illness; however, titration to higher doses may have led to even more adverse events.

Overall, there is little evidence for the use of fluvoxamine as an SSRI of choice for the treatment of BN.

Results with sertraline have been more promising, although the results of only one small randomized trial with 20 patients have been reported. Of interest, significant improvement versus placebo occurred with only 100 mg/d, in contrast with the relatively high doses required for fluoxetine.

The reason for this finding is unknown, but replication on a larger scale would be beneficial.

Little work has been undertaken in controlled trials to compare various SSRIs for BN. One randomized controlled trial of 6 weeks' duration that involved 91 inpatients was designed to explore a genetic basis for drug response. No such basis was elucidated, but the authors reported that fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, and paroxetine were all superior to placebo.

Findings from a smaller controlled study in which patients were randomized to either citalopram or fluoxetine indicate that both groups had significant improvement in eating psychopathology.


Success with the SSRIs lends support to the theory of altered serotonin activity in BN. Nonetheless, neurotransmitter dysregulation in the disorder is more complex, and it has been known for some time that the noradrenergic system is implicated as well.

some tricyclic antidepressants with prominent noradrenergic effects, including desipramine and imipramine, were shown to reduce binge eating and purging.

This class of drugs may be associated with greater adverse effects in BN and thus these drugs are rarely used.

However, it is surprising that no controlled trials have been conducted with the newer generation noradrenergic antidepressants. Small open trials in Austria and Italy used reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor not available in the United States. Results showed a decrease in bingeing and purging symptoms as well as other psychological variables.



There are no reports of venlafaxine as a treatment for BN; however, a retrospective review found some efficacy for this serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in patients with the related condition of binge-eating disorder.

The other currently prescribed SNRI, duloxetine, has appeared in a single case report of treatment-refractory BN, in which the patient achieved remission of bingeing and purging symptoms on a high dosage of 120 mg/d.

Clearly, controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy of SNRIs for treating BN.

Bupropion is another antidepressant worth mentioning. In 1988, the immediate-release formulation was found to be effective in reducing BN symptoms in a controlled study; however, 4 of 69 patients who received the drug had generalized seizures, resulting in its contraindication by the FDA for use in eating disorders.

Subsequently, the investigators of the study reported doing an intensive examination of the patients who had experienced seizures. They found no common features in these patients' medical histories, laboratory results, concomitant medication use, or other variables that might explain predisposition to seizure, and concluded that the increased incidence of seizures could not be explained.

Although no study has attempted to replicate these findings using the lower doses and longer-acting forms of the drug more commonly prescribed today, clinicians in the eating disorders field generally avoid using bupropion when treating patients with BN.

Antidepressants were initially proposed for treatment of BN because of the frequent accompanying mood symptoms of these patients. However, such medications also have proved helpful in patients with BN without comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders; they appear to independently target symptoms of binge eating, purging, and preoccupation with shape and weight.

This result, along with a generally more rapid onset of action and, for fluoxetine, a higher dosage requirement than is seen with treatment of depression, suggests that drug action for BN symptoms may occur by a different mechanism, perhaps relating in part to underlying variance in the serotonergic abnormalities found in BN patients versus those with major depression.

Such a possibility has led to case reports and small trials of novel medica-tions, most notably topiramate and ondansetron.




The anticonvulsant topiramate has been linked to appetite suppression and weight loss, and interest in its use in BN followed suggestions of efficacy in patients with binge eating disorder.

 Results from the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate in BN were reported in 2003. The 10-week trial of 69 patients began with a dosage of 25 mg/d titrated to a maximum of 400 mg/d (median 100 mg/d). Topiramate was found to be more efficacious than placebo in decreasing frequency of bingeing and purging behaviors (to a similar degree as that seen in antidepressant trials) and in improving other psychological measures, including anxiety, self-esteem, eating attitudes, and body image. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, resolved with time or dose reduction, and did not usually lead to withdrawal from the study.

A 10-week controlled trial in 2004 found similar results with regard to reductions in bingeing and purging behaviors, and a decrease in weight was reported in the topiramate group.

 

There was an unusually low dropout rate among the 60 participants, possibly because the study enrolled only patients with moderate BN, or because the dose was increased slowly and remained relatively low (25 to 250 mg/d).

Despite the report that there were few intolerable adverse effects in these small studies, adverse reactions to topiramate are common in clinical psychiatric practice, which tends to limit its use.




Another novel agent proposed for treatment of BN is the antiemetic ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment. It targets serotonin release from enterochromaffin cells in the gut that may cause the symptoms by stimulating afferent branches of the vagus nerve and thereby initiating the vomiting reflex. One group of investigators has postulated that an escalating cycle of bingeing and purging behaviors in chronic BN results at least in part from a desensitization in the threshold for activation of vagal afferent fibers, with dysregulation of satiety mechanisms.

The results of a randomized, double-blind trial of 25 patients with severe, chronic BN showed that ondansetron was more effective than placebo in reducing binge eating and purging by vomiting during a 4-week period.

Past criticisms of potential ondansetron use have included expense and short half-life. While the drug is now available as a generic, the problem of multiple daily dosing still remains. If an extended-release version of ondansetron becomes available, larger and longer studies that include an assessment of the impact on psychological features of BN could be of interest.




A few other medications have been studied in a limited number of small trials. Endogenous opioids are believed to be involved in the regulation of food intake, and the opioid antagonist naltrexone attracted attention in the late 1980s after it was observed to decrease appetite in some patients recently detoxified from opioid dependence. Unfortunately, when subsequently tested in patients with BN, the standard naltrexone doses used in addiction were found ineffective. There appeared to be some efficacy in open-label studies at 200 to 300 mg/d, but because this dosage is high enough to raise concerns of liver toxicity, naltrexone is not recommended.



Lithium carbonate was no more effective than placebo for symptoms of BN in one controlled trial. Mean plasma concentrations at the low end of the usual therapeutic range may have affected outcome

; nonetheless, lithium use entails a potential toxicity risk for patients who continue purging. Carbamazepine did not prove beneficial in an early controlled trial with 6 patients.



A future direction of research may involve the atypical antipsychotics, which have not been formally studied for use in BN. Interest in this medication class stems from preliminary data that show efficacy in some patients with anorexia nervosa, as well as reports of efficacy when used as an augmenting agent in depression and anxiety disorders.



At the University of California San Diego Center for Eating Disorders Treatment and Research, we occasionally use low-dose atypical antipsychotics to augment antidepressants in some of our patients who have more chronic and severe BN and whose disorder has proved refractory to the established treatments (typically, these patients also have not achieved remission of comorbid depression or anxiety on various antidepressants). These patients often are also of relatively low weight and display the rigid, restrictive thought processes more typical of patients with anorexia nervosa.

While case reports and small open trials of anorexia nervosa, mostly with inpatients, have focused on olanzepine, quetiapine, and risperidone, in consideration that the weight gain sometimes attributed to these medications may benefit emaciated patients, we have found use of these particular medications in our BN outpatients to be problematic. Even in cases where patients accept the need to attain a higher target weight, fear of uncontrollable weight gain prevents most patients from agreeing to a medication trial, and those who do rarely remain adherent. In addition, some investigators have expressed concern that these medications, especially olanzapine, might exacerbate binge eating symptoms in patients with eating disorders.

We have had more success in starting patients on the generally weight-neutral antipsychotics aripiprazole and ziprasidone. Our patients who find these medications helpful describe a reduction in distress around eating, more willingness to attempt their prescribed meal plans, fewer obsessional thoughts about food, exercise, weight, and body image, and less tendency to dwell on these thoughts when they do occur. For some, reductions in bingeing, purging, and restrictive eating behaviors have been demonstrated clinically. Mood tends to improve as well. However, it must be emphasized that without trial data, use of the atypical antipsychotics in BN remains experimental. Any desired benefit must be weighed against potential adverse effects, including the unlikely but possible risk of tardive dyskinesia.




There are minimal controlled trial data on long-term efficacy of pharmacotherapy for BN. A relatively large study designed to isolate long-term potential benefits of antidepressant medication, conducted in 2002, was hampered by significant rates of attrition in both study drug and placebo arms. The trial began with 232 patients who received an 8-week course of fluoxetine, 60 mg/d, under single-blind treatment conditions. Of this group, 150 patients were considered responders (ie, a 50% or greater decrease in weekly vomiting episodes), and were randomly assigned to continued fluoxetine treatment or placebo for a 1-year double-blind relapse prevention phase.

Findings included a lower rate of relapse for the fluoxetine group, but the investigators noted a worsening on all measures of efficacy over time. They concluded that pharmacotherapy alone may not be adequate treatment after acute response for most patients.

Perhaps even more concerning was a less than 20% acute-phase remission rate in this study. This result, which is described as consistent with data from other trials, reveals that the vast majority of responders were still bingeing and purging at the beginning of maintenance therapy, which indicates that the idea of relapse prevention may be dubious for most trial participants.



Pharmacological management of BN in adolescents


It should be mentioned that data regarding pharmacological treatment of BN have been gathered almost exclusively from adult patients. One small open trial of fluoxetine in adolescents with BN suggested it was useful and well tolerated,

but in general, clinicians are left to extrapolate from the adult trial literature in treating young patients. Because of the physical and psychological morbidity and risk of chronicity when BN remains poorly treated, we tend to use the same criteria 

 in initiating SSRIs in adolescents, with the full informed consent of both patients and their parents.



Treatment combining medication and psychotherapy


At least 6 controlled trials have assessed direct comparisons of outcome for patients with BN treated with psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or a combination.

In general, results showed a greater decrease in the frequency of bingeing and purging episodes with cognitive-behavioral therapy than with antidepressant medication when each was used alone. With treatments used in combination, the results to date have been mixed. Although several trials indicate that medication conferred no significant benefit beyond that achieved with psychotherapy, on balance, study results slightly favored the addition of medication to psychotherapy for many patients.

In the clinical community, there is a consensus that an approach including both psychotherapy and medication is worth considering in most cases.


Psychotropic medications, especially the SSRIs, are helpful for some patients with BN, at least in the short term. More than a decade has elapsed since the FDA approved fluoxetine for use in adult patients with BN, and few notable developments in medication management have taken place since that time. The extent of efficacy of SSRIs and other medications has been questioned since relatively few individuals abstain from binge eating and purging behaviors, and relapse during treatment is common.

Medications that have received some attention but are in need of further investigation include the SNRIs, topiramate, and possibly ondansetron. Augmentation of antidepressants also has not been investigated, and the atypical antipsychotics should be studied for this use.

 


1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
2. Kaye WH, Walsh BT. Psychopharmacology of eating disorders. In: Davis K, Charney D, Coyle J, Nemeroff C, eds. Neuropsychopharmacology. The Fifth Generation of Progress. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:1675-1683.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Eating Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2006.
4. Bacaltchuk J, Hay P. Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD003391.
5. Nakash-Eisikovits O, Dierberger A, Westen D. A multidimensional meta-analysis of pharmacotherapy for bulimia nervosa: summarizing the range of outcome in controlled clinical trials. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2002;10:193-211.
6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa and Related Eating Disorders. London: British Psychological Society; 2004.
7. Fluoxetine Bulimia Nervosa Collaborative Study Group. Fluoxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:139-147.
8. Goldstein DJ, Wilson MG, Thompson VL, et al. Long-term fluoxetine treatment of bulimia nervosa. Fluoxetine Bulimia Nervosa Research Group. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;166:660-666.
9. Fichter MM, Kruger R, Rief W, et al. Fluvoxamine in prevention of relapse in bulimia nervosa: effects on eating-specific psychopathology. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;16:9-18.
10. Schmidt U, Cooper P, Essers H. Fluvoxamine and graded psychotherapy in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of short-term and long-term pharmacotherapy combined with a stepped care approach to psychotherapy. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;24: 549-552.
11. Milano W, Siano C, Petrella C, Capasso A. Treatment of bulimia nervosa with fluvoxamine: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2005;22:278-283.
12. Milano W, Petrella C, Sabatino C, Capasso A. Treatment of bulimia nervosa with sertraline: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2004;21:232-237.
13. Erzegovesi S, Riboldi C, Di Bella D. Bulimia nervosa, 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and treatment response to four SSRIs: a single-blind study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;24:680-682.
14. Leombruni P, Amianto F, Delsedime N, et al. Citalopram versus fluoxetine for the treatment of patients with bulimia nervosa: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2006;23:481-494.
15. Fava M, Copeland PM, Schweiger U, Herzog DB. Neurochemical abnormalities of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146: 963-971.
16. Brambilla F. Aetiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of bulimia nervosa: biological bases and implications for treatment. CNS Drugs. 2001;15:119-136.
17. Kruger S, Kennedy SH. Pharmacotherapy of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000;25:497-508.
18. Fassino S, Daga GA, Boggio S, et al. Use of reboxetine in bulimia nervosa: a pilot study. J Psychopharmacol. 2004;18:423-428.
19. El-Giamal N, de Zwaan M, Bailer U, et al. Reboxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a report of seven cases. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;15: 351-356.
20. Malhotra S, King KH, Welge JA, et al. Venlafaxine treatment of binge-eating disorder associated with obesity: a series of 35 patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:802-806.
21. Hazen E, Fava M. Successful treatment with duloxetine in a case of treatment refractory bulimia nervosa: a case report. J Psychopharmacol. 2006;20: 723-724.
22. Horne RL, Ferguson JM, Pope HG Jr, et al. Treatment of bulimia with bupropion: a multicenter controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;49:262-266.
23. Pope HG Jr, McElroy SL, Keck PE Jr, et al. Electrophysiologic abnormalities in bulimia and their implications for pharmacotherapy: a reassessment. Int J Eat Disord. 1989;8:191-201.
24. Goldstein DJ, Wilson MG, Ascroft RC, al-Banna M. Effectiveness of fluoxetine therapy in bulimia nervosa regardless of comorbid depression. Int J Eat Disord. 1999;25:19-27.
25. Brewerton TD, Mueller EA, Lesem MD, et al. Neuroendocrine responses to m-chlorophenylpiperazine and L-tryptophan in bulimia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:852-861.
26. Appolinario J, McElroy SL. Pharmacological approaches in the treatment of binge eating disorder. Curr Drug Targets. 2004;5:301-307.
27. Hoopes S, Reimherr F, Hedges D. Treatment of bulimia nervosa with topiramate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, part 1: improvement in binge and purge measures. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:1335-1341.
28. Hedges D, Reimherr F, Hoopes S. Treatment of bulimia nervosa with topiramate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, part 2: improvement in psychiatric measures. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:1449-1454.
29. Nickel C, Tritt K, Muehlbacher M. Topiramate treatment in bulimia nervosa patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Eat Disord. 2005;38:295-300.
30. McElroy SL, Kotwal R, Keck PE Jr. Comorbidity of eating disorders with bipolar disorder and treatment implications. Bipolar Disord. 2006;8:686-695.
31. Faris PL, Kim SW, Meller WH, et al. Effect of decreasing afferent vagal activity with ondansetron on symptoms of bulimia nervosa: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2000;355:792-797.
32. Jonas JM, Gold MS. The use of opiate antagonists in treating bulimia: a study of low-dose versus high-dose naltrexone. Psychiatry Res.1988;24:195-199.
33. Igoin-Apfelbaum L, Apfelbaum M. Naltrexone and bulimic symptoms. Lancet. 1987;2:1087-1088.
34. Mitchell JE, Christenson G, Jennings J, et al. A placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of naltrexone hydrochloride in outpatients with normal weight bulimia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989;9:94-97.
35. Alger SA, Schwalberg MD, Bigaouette JM, et al. Effect of a tricyclic antidepressant and opiate antagonist on binge-eating behavior in normoweight bulimic and obese, binge-eating subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:865-871.
36. Hsu LK, Clement L, Santhouse R, Ju ES. Treatment of bulimia nervosa with lithium carbonate. A controlled study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991;179:351-355.
37. Kaplan AS, Garfinkel PE, Darby PL, Garner DM. Carbamazepine in the treatment of bulimia. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:1225-1226.
38. Dunican KC, DelDotto D. The role of olanzapine in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:111-115.
39. Newman-Toker J. Risperidone in anorexia nervosa. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39: 941-942.
40. Powers PS, Bannon Y, Eubanks R, McCormick T. Quetiapine in anorexia nervosa patients: an open label outpatient pilot study. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40: 21-26.
41. Bosanac P, Kurlender S, Norman T, et al. An open-label study of quetiapine in anorexia nervosa. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007;22:223-230.
42. Mehler-Wex C, Romanos M, Kirchheiner J, Schulze UM. Atypical antipsychotics in severe anorexia nervosa in children and adolescents-review and case reports. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2008;16:100-108.
43. Philip NS, Carpenter LL, Tyrka AR, Price LH. Augmentation of antidepressants with atypical antipsychotics: a review of the current literature. J Psychiatr Pract. 2008;14:34-44.
44. Gebhardt S, Haberhausen M, Krieg JC, et al. Clozapine/olanzapine-induced recurrence or deterioration of binge eating-related eating disorders. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:1091-1095.
45. Romano SJ, Halmi KA, Sarkar NP, et al. A placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in continued treatment of bulimia nervosa after successful acute fluoxetine treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:96-102.
46. McElroy SL, Kotwal R, Keck PE Jr. Comorbidity of eating disorders with bipolar disorder and treatment implications. Bipolar Disord. 2006; 8:686-695.
47. Kaye W, Strober M, Jimerson D. The neurobiology of eating disorders. In: Charney DS, Nestler EJ, eds. The Neurobiology of Mental Illness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:1112-1128.
48. Steinglass JE, Walsh T. Psychopharmacology of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. In: Brewerton TD, ed. Clinical Handbook of Eating Disorders: An Integrated Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004:489-508.
49. Walsh BT, Hadigan CM, Devlin MJ, et al. Long-term outcome of antidepressant treatment for bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1206-1212.

Bulimia nervosa is a disorder with a complex cause. The disorder is most commonly seen in women, generally with onset in adolescence.

Author | Mary Ellen Trunko, MD

Articles

New content coming soon, please check back later.